Managing the Negotiation Process

  • David Fairman
  • Diana Chigas
  • Elizabeth McClintock
  • Nick Drager
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Public Health book series (BRIEFSPUBLIC)

Abstract

In global public health negotiations, the stakes are usually high and often time is of the essence. The outbreak of the SARS epidemic in late 2002, for example, illustrated how rapidly crises can occur and how immediate action may be required. Negotiations on immediate and short-term issues such as SARS, and even on long-term policies not triggered by a crisis, can be made all the more complex by diverse interests, conflicting understandings of underlying facts and linkages among the multitude of issues. Specific obstacles to joint problem-solving may include disagreement on the existence, certainty or severity of the problem; on the best way to tackle the problem or the likelihood of success; or on who bears responsibility to act, who will pay costs and who will manage the response. In the health sector, national leaders in key countries may be reluctant to acknowledge the urgent need to address the spread of a disease, either because they question the facts or because they fear that taking action will have negative impacts on their international image and/or domestic political support.

Keywords

Negotiation Negotiation process Joint fact-finding Interests Interest-based negotiation Stakeholder process HIV/AIDS Intergovernmental Working Group on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property (IGWG) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) World Health Assembly (WHA) Commission on Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation and Public Health Mutual gains approach Preparation Value creation Value distribution Follow through Implementation Best Alternative to Negotiated Agreement (BATNA) Alternative Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) Doha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health World Trade Organization (WTO) Positions Indonesia Avian flu virus Options Brazil Brainstorming FCTC Pandemic influenza preparedness negotiations Criteria Framework convention on climate change Contingent agreements Issue mapping Issue trade-offs Single text approach Modes of decision-making Building trust Culture 

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Fairman
    • 1
  • Diana Chigas
    • 2
  • Elizabeth McClintock
    • 3
  • Nick Drager
    • 4
  1. 1.Consensus Building InstituteCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.CDA-Collaborative Learning ProjectsCambridgeUSA
  3. 3.CM Partners LLCCambridgeUSA
  4. 4.Professor of Practice of Public Policy and Global Health DiplomacyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations