The Effect of Authentic Input Devices on Computer Game Immersion



A key question in the field of computer game studies is the user experience during the gameplay. One of the main factors influencing this experience is the control mechanism that players use to interact with the game system. With the launch of the Wii Console in 2006, Nintendo introduced an innovative concept of controlling computer games that allows users to manipulate and to interact with game elements on the screen by moving and pointing the input device. The usage of game controllers with a high degree of perceptual closeness should influence the gaming experience in such a manner that the degree of immersion is higher compared to the usage of a regular gamepad which eventually leads to a higher entertainment value. We conducted a study to examine the influence of the input device players use to control a game on the immersion and perceived entertainment value. The results of the study show, in accordance with our assumptions, that a more authentic input device results in a higher degree of immersion and entertainment value.


Authentic Input Gamepad Computer Game Studies Controlling Computer Games Gaming Experience 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



  1. Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Björk, S., & Holopainen, J. (2004). Patterns in game design. Hingham: Charles River Media.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, E., & Cairns, P. (2004). A grounded investigation of immersion in games. In E. Dykstra-Erickson & M. Tscheligi (Eds.), ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2004 (pp. 1297–1300). New York: ACM Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2005). Das Flow Erlebnis. jenseits von Angst und Langeweile: im Tun aufgehen [1975]. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
  5. Douglas, Y., & Hargadon, A. (2000). The pleasure principle: Immersion, engagement, flow. In F. M. Shipman, P. J. Nürnberg, & D. L. Hicks (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM on Hypertext and Hypermedia (pp. 153–160). San Antonio: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ermi, L., & Mäyrä, F. (2005). Fundamental components of the gameplay experience: Analysing immersion. In Proceedings of DiGRA 2005 Conference: Changing Views: World in Play. Vancouver: University of Vancouver. Accessed 5 Oct 2009.
  7. Gander, P. (1999). Two myths about immersion in new storytelling media. Lund University Cognitive Studies, 80, 1–16.Google Scholar
  8. Heers, R. (2005). Being There – Untersuchungen zum Wissenserwerb in virtuellen Umgebungen. Dissertation an der Fakultät für Informations- und Kognitionswissenschaften der Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Tübingen.Google Scholar
  9. Held, R., & Durlach, N. (1992). Telepresence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(1), 109–112.Google Scholar
  10. Insko, B. E. (2003). Measuring presence: Subjective, behavioral and psychological methods. In G. Riva, F. Davide, & W. Ijsselsteijn (Eds.), Being there: Concepts, effects and measurement of user presence in synthetic environments (pp. 109–120). Amsterdam: Ios Press.Google Scholar
  11. Jennett, C., Cox, A., Cairns, P., Dhoparee, S., Epps, A., & Tijs, T. (2008). Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 66(9), 641–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Klimmt, C. (2006). Computerspielen als Handlung: Dimensionen und Determinanten des Erlebens interaktiver Unterhaltungsangebote. Köln: Halem.Google Scholar
  13. McMahan, A. (2003). Immersion, engagement, and presence. A method for analyzing 3-D video games. In M. J. P. Wolf & B. Perron (Eds.), The video game theory reader (pp. 67–87). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Murray, J. (1997). Hamlet on the Holodeck: The future of narrative in cyberspace. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Neitzel, B. (2008). Medienrezeption und Spiel. In J. Distelmeyer, C. Hanke, & D. Mersch (Eds.), Game over!? Perspektiven des Computerspiels (pp. 95–115). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
  16. Pietschmann, D. (2009). Erleben in virtuellen Welten. Boizenburg: Verlag Werner Hülsbusch.Google Scholar
  17. Ryan, M.-L. (2001). Narrative as virtual reality. Immersion and interactivity in literature and electronic media. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
  18. Slater, M., & Wilbur, S. (1997). A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 6(6), 603–616. Accessed 10 Oct 2009.
  19. Smith, E. R., & Queller, S. (2001). Mental representations. In A. Tesser & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intraindividual processes. London: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tamborini, R., & Skalski, P. (2006). The role of presence in the experience of electronic games. In P. Vorderer & J. Bryant (Eds.), Playing video games. Motives, responses, and consequences (pp. 225–241). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  22. Van Baren, J., & IJsselsteijn, w. (2004). Measuring presence: A guide to current measurement approaches. Madison: OmniPres.Google Scholar
  23. Witmer, B., & Singer, M. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(3), 225–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Witzmann, H. (2007). Game controller: Vom Paddle zur gestenbasierten Steuerung. Boizenburg: Verlag Werner Hülsbusch.Google Scholar
  25. Zimmerman, E. (2004). Narrative, interactivity, play, and games: Four naughty concepts in need of discipline. In N. Wardrip-Fruin & P. Harrigan (Eds.), First person: New media as story, performance, and game (pp. 154–164). Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar


  1. Rockstar Games Presents Table Tennis. (2008). Rockstar (Dev./Pub.); [Wii, Xbox 360].Google Scholar
  2. Sega Superstar Tennis. (2008). Sumo Digital (Dev.); Sega Enterprises (Pub.); [Nintendo DS, PlayStation 2, PlayStation 3, Wii, Xbox 360].Google Scholar
  3. The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time. (1998). Nintendo (Dev./Pub.); [Nintendo 64, Wii].Google Scholar
  4. Top Spin 3. (2008). PAM Development (Dev.); 2K Sports (Pub.); [PlayStation 3, Xbox 360].Google Scholar
  5. Wii Sports. (2005). Nintendo (Dev./Pub.); [Wii].Google Scholar
  6. World of Warcraft. (2004). Blizzard Entertainment (Dev.); Vivendi (Pub.); [Macintosh, Windows].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chair of Media Psychology and Media SociologyUniversity of Technology ChemnitzChemnitzGermany

Personalised recommendations