A Systems View on Infrastructure Asset Management

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter discusses the need for a systems view on asset management. According to this view multiple elements or agents are defined that interact and together determine system behaviour. The chapter illustrates how these methods and tools can be used for infrastructure design.

Keywords

Real Option Asset Management Risk Process Infrastructure System Asset Base 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ajah AN (2009) On the Conceptual Design of Large-scale Process & Energy Infrastructure Systems: Integrating Flexibility, Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Economics (FRAME) Performance Metrics. Dissertation, Delft University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  2. Altamirano MA (2010) Innovatieve contracting practices in the road sector: Cross-national lessons in dealing with opportunistic behavior. Dissertation, Delft University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauer J, Herder PM (2009). Designing Socio-Technical Systems. In: DovGabbay, Thagard P, and Woods J (Eds) Handbook of the Philosophy of Science: Handbook Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences. Elsevier PublishersGoogle Scholar
  4. Beer T, Ziolkowski F (1995) Environmental risk assessment: an Australian perspective. Barton, Supervising scientistGoogle Scholar
  5. Breen H van, Herder PM (2010). Empowered Networks. Assets, Institute for Asset Management, UKGoogle Scholar
  6. COSO (2004) Enterprise risk management- Integrated Approach: Executive summaryGoogle Scholar
  7. Dewar JA (2002) Assumption-Based Planning: a tool for reducing avoidable surprises. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dewar JA., Builder CH and Hix WM (1993) Assumption-based planning; a planning tool for very uncertain times. Rand Corporation, Santa MonicaGoogle Scholar
  9. Finger M, Groenewegen J, Künneke RW (2005) The quest for coherence between institutions and technologies in infrastructures. Journal of Network Industries 6(4):227-259Google Scholar
  10. ISO (2009) ISO 31000: Risk Management- Principles and guidelinesGoogle Scholar
  11. Jonker M (2010) Modernization of electricity networks. Dissertation, Delft University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  12. Klinke A, Renn O (2002) A new approach to risk evaluation and management: Risk Based, precaution based and discourse based strategies. Risk analysis 22:1071-1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Korn MS, Veldman E (2008) The benefits of continuous risk management. International conference on infrastructure systems: Building networks for a brighter future. Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  14. Künneke RW (2008) Institutional reform and technological practice: the case of electricity. Industrial and corporate change 17(2):233-265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Masera M., Wijnia Y, Vries L de, Caroline K (2006) Governing Risks in the European Critical Electricity Infrastructure. In: Gheorge AV, Masers M, Weijnen M, Vried L de (eds) Critical Infrastructures at Risk, Topics in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, 9:117-152Google Scholar
  16. Morgan MG, Florig HK, Dekay ML, Fischbeck P (2000) Categorizing risk for risk ranking. Risk analysis 20:49-58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. National Research Council (Committee On Risk Categorization) (1996) Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society, Washington D.C., National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  18. Neufville R de, Scholtes S (2011) Flexibility in Design, MIT Press, ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  19. Slovic P (1987) Perception of risk. Science 236:280-285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Walker WE, Rahman SA, Cave J (2001) Adaptive policies, policy analysis, and policy-making. European Journal of Operational Research 128(2):282-289CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Wijnia YC, Herder PM (2004) Modeling Interdependencies in electricity infrastructure risk. 1st Annual CZAEE International Conference “Critical Infrastructure in the energy sector: Vulnerabilities and protection”. PragueGoogle Scholar
  22. Wijnia YC, Herder PM (2009) The State of Asset Management in the Netherlands. World Conference on Engineering Asset Management. Athens, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  23. Wijnia YC, Nikolic I (2007) Assessing Business Continuity Risk in IT. 2007 IEEE Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. MontrealGoogle Scholar
  24. Wijnia YC, Warners JP (2006) Prioritizing investment. The value of portfolio decisions in electricity infrastructure management. 29th IAEE Annual International Energy Conference 2006: ‘Securing Energy in Insecure Times’. PotsdamGoogle Scholar
  25. Wijnia YC (2010) Asset Risk Management: Issues in the design and use of the risk matrix. the 5th World conference on engineering asset management Brisbane, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  26. Wijnia YC, Herder PM, Korn MS, Poorts M, Veldman E (2008) Long term infrastructure risk management. WCEAM IMS 2008. BeijingGoogle Scholar
  27. Wijnia YC, Hermkens RJM, Flonk J (2011) The Safety Indicator: Measuring Safety in Gas Distribution Networks. In Amadi-Echendu, JE, Brown K., Willett R. & Mathew J (Eds.) Definitions, Concepts and Scope of Engineering Asset Management London, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  28. Wijnia YC, Korn MS, De Jager SY, Herder PM (2006) Long Term optimization of asset replacement in energy infrastructures. 2006 IEEE Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Taipei, TaiwanGoogle Scholar
  29. Williamson OE (2000) The New Institutional Economics: taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38:595-613CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Technology, Policy and ManagementDelft University of Technology, Next Generation Infrastructures FoundationDelftThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Technology, Policy and ManagementDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations