Educating the Rural Child

  • Arathi Sriprakash
Chapter
Part of the Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects book series (EDAP, volume 16)

Abstract

This chapter examines the ways in which education for rural students has been understood by teachers in India, especially in light of the new expectations of students emphasised in child-centred reforms. Nali Kali and Learner Centred reform ideals have constructed the student as ‘creative’, ‘different’, ‘active’ and ‘independent’, and as being able to ‘think independently’, ‘act independently’, ‘problem solve’, ‘work in groups’ and ‘construct meaning’. These complex and often highly individualised expectations of the child are in stark contrast to the child’s position as passive learner in the textbook-oriented, rote-based pedagogies predominantly found in Indian primary schools. This chapter shows how teachers in Mallige and Kamala clusters understood the role of the school and shaped their expectations of the rural student with respect to new child-centred discourses and the broader social contexts of their work.

Keywords

Corporal Punishment Good Student Classroom Interaction Pedagogic Interaction Rural Child 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Chaudhary, N. (2004). Listening to culture: Constructing reality from everyday talk. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Connell, R. W. (1994). Poverty and education. Harvard Educational Review, 64(2), 125–149.Google Scholar
  5. Kakar, S. (1981). The inner world: A psycho-analytic study of childhood and society in India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Keddie, N. (1971). Classroom knowledge. In M. F. D. Young (Ed.), Knowledge and control: New directions for the sociology of education (pp. 133–160). London: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Kumar, K. (1993). Study of childhood and family. In T. S. Saraswathi & B. Kaur (Eds.), Human development and family studies: An agenda for research and policy. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Kumar, K. (2007a). Education and culture: India’s quest for a secular policy. In K. Kumar & J. Oesterheld (Eds.), Education and social change in South Asia. New Delhi: Orient Longman.Google Scholar
  9. Kumar, N. (2007b). The family-school relationship and an alternative history of the nineteenth century family. In N. Kumar (Ed.), The politics of gender, community, and modernity: Essays on education in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Nambissan, G. B. (2006). Terms of inclusion: Dalits and the right to education. In R. Kumar (Ed.), The crisis of elementary education in India. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Sarangapani, P. (2003). Constructing school knowledge: An ethnography of learning in an Indian village. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Sarangapani, P. (2004). Childhood and schooling in an Indian village. In J. Suthren-Hirst & L. Thomas (Eds.), Playing for real: Hindu role models, religion, and gender. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Subrahmanian, R. (2005). Education exclusion and the development state. In P. Jeffery & R. Chopra (Eds.), Education regimes in contemporary India. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  14. Uberoi, P. (2006). Freedom and destiny: Gender, family and popular culture in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Viruru, R. (2001). Do we have childhood in India? Do we need it? In R. Viruru (Ed.), Early childhood education: Postcolonial perspectives from India. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arathi Sriprakash
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Education and Social WorkUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations