Advancing Nanostructured Porous Si-Based Optical Transducers for Label Free Bacteria Detection

  • Naama Massad-Ivanir
  • Giorgi Shtenberg
  • Ester Segal
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 733)


Optical label-free porous Si-based biosensors for rapid bacteria detection are introduced. The biosensors are designed to directly capture the target bacteria cells onto their surface with no prior sample processing (such as cell lysis). Two types of nanostructured optical transducers based on oxidized porous Si (PSiO2) Fabry-Pérot thin films are synthesized and used to construct the biosensors. In the first system, we graft specific monoclonal antibodies (immunoglobulin G’s) onto a neat electrochemically-machined PSiO2 surface, based on well-established silanization chemistry. The second biosensor class consists of a PSiO2/hydrogel hybrid. The hydrogel, polyacrylamide, is synthesized in situ within the nanostructured PSiO2 host and conjugated with specific monoclonal antibodies to provide the active component of the biosensor. Exposure of these modified-surfaces to the target bacteria results in “direct-cell-capture” onto the biosensor surface. These specific binding events induce predictable changes in the thin-film optical interference spectrum of the biosensor. Our studies demonstrate the applicability of these biosensors for the detection of low bacterial concentrations, in the range of 103–105 cell/ml, within minutes. The sensing performance of the two different platforms, in terms of their stability in aqueous media and sensitivity, are compared and discussed. This preliminary study suggests that biosensors based on PSiO2/hydrogel hybrid outperform the neat PSiO2 system.


Porous Si Biosensor Bacteria detection Optical transducer Hydrogel Hybrid 



This work was supported by Marie Curie European Reintegration Grant, The Israel Science Foundation (grant No. 1118/08). E.S gratefully acknowledges the generous financial support of the Technion and the Russell Berrie Nanotechnology Institute.


  1. Alvarez, S. D., Schwartz, M. P., Migliori, B., Rang, C. U., Chao, L., & Sailor, M. J. (2007). Using a porous silicon photonic crystal for bacterial cell-based biosensing. Physica Status Solidi a–Applications and Materials Science, 204, 1439–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archer, M., Christophersen, M., Fauchet, P. M., Persaud, D., & Hirschman, K. D. (2004). Electrical porous silicon microarray for DNA hybridization detection. Micro- and Nanosystems, 782, 385–391.Google Scholar
  3. Bonanno, L. M., & Delouise, L. A. (2007). Steric crowding effects on target detection in an affinity biosensor. Langmuir, 23, 5817–5823.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonanno, L. M., & Delouise, L. A. (2009a) Design of a hybrid amine functionalized polyacrylamide hydrogel-porous silicon optical sensor. Proceedings of SPIE, 7167, 71670F1-11.Google Scholar
  5. Bonanno, L. M., & Delouise, L. A. (2009b). Optical detection of polyacrylamide swelling behavior in a porous silicon sensor. Materials Research Society Symposium. Proceeding., 1133, 1133-AA01-05.Google Scholar
  6. Burnham, M. R., Turner, J. N., Szarowski, D., & Martin, D. L. (2006). Biological functionalization and surface micropatterning of polyacrylamide hydrogels. Biomaterials, 27, 5883–5891.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chan, S., Horner, S. R., Fauchet, P. M., & Miller, B. L. (2001). Identification of gram negative bacteria using nanoscale silicon microcavities. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 123(47), 11797–11798.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dancil, K.-P. S., Greiner, D. P., & Sailor, M. J. (1999). A porous silicon optical biosensor: Detection of reversible ­binding of IgG to a protein A-modified surface. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 121, 7925–7930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. D’Auria, S., de Champdore, M., Aurilia, V., Parracino, A., Staiano, M., Vitale, A., Rossi, M., Rea, I., Rotiroti, L., Rossi, A. M., Borini, S., Rendina, I., & de Stefano, L. (2006). Nanostructured silicon-based biosensors for the selective identification of analytes of social interest. Journal of Physics. Condensed Matter, 18, S2019–S2028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Leon, S. B., Sa’Ar, A., Oren, R., Spira, M. E., & Yitzchaik, S. (2004). Neurons culturing and biophotonic sensing using porous silicon. Applied Physics Letters, 84, 4361–4363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Delouise, L. A., Fauchet, P. M., Miller, B. L., & Pentland, A. A. (2005a). Hydrogel-supported optical-microcavity sensors. Advanced Materials, 17, 2199–2203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Delouise, L. A., Kou, P. M., & Miller, B. L. (2005b). Cross-correlation of optical microcavity biosensor response with immobilized enzyme activity. Insights into biosensor sensitivity. Analytical Chemistry, 77, 3222–3230.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dudak, F. C., & Boyaci, I. H. (2007). Development of an immunosensor based on surface plasmon resonance for enumeration of Escherichia coli in water samples. Food Research International, 40, 803–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dudak, F. C., & Boyaci, I. H. (2009). Rapid and label-free bacteria detection by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensors. Biotechnology Journal, 4, 1003–1011.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jane, A., Dronov, R., Hodges, A., & Voelcker, N. H. (2009). Porous silicon biosensors on the advance. Trends in Biotechnology, 27, 230–239.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Janshoff, A., Dancil, K. P. S., Steinem, C., Greiner, D. P., LIN, V. S. Y., Gurtner, C., Motesharei, K., Sailor, M. J., & Ghadiri, M. R. (1998). Macroporous p-type silicon Fabry-Perot layers. Fabrication, characterization, and applications in biosensing. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 120, 12108–12116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kilian, K. A., Boecking, T., & Gooding, J. J. (2009). The importance of surface chemistry in mesoporous materials: Lessons from porous silicon biosensors. Chemical Communications, 630–640.Google Scholar
  18. Li, Y. Y., Cunin, F., Link, J. R., Gao, T., Betts, R. E., Reiver, S. H., Chin, V., Bhatia, S. N., & Sailor, M. J. (2003). Polymer replicas of photonic porous silicon for sensing and drug delivery applications. Science, 299, 2045–2047.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li, Y. Y., Kollengode, V. S., & Sailor, M. J. (2005). Porous silicon/polymer nanocomposite photonic crystals by microdroplet patterning. Advanced Materials, 17, 1249–1251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Massad-Ivanir, N., Shtenberg, G., Zeidman, T., & Segal, E. (2010). Construction and characterization of porous SiO2/hydrogel hybrids as optical biosensors for rapid detection of bacteria. Advanced Functional Materials, 20, 2269–2277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Massad-Ivanir, N., Shtenberg, G., Tzur, A., Krepker, A. M., & Segal, E. (2011). Engineering nanostructured porous SiO2 surfaces for bacteria detection via “direct cell capture”. Analytical Chemistry, 83, 3282–3289.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Pacholski, C., Sartor, M., Sailor, M. J., Cunin, F., & Miskelly, G. M. (2005). Biosensing using porous silicon double-layer interferometers: Reflective interferometric Fourier transform spectroscopy. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 127, 11636–11645.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pacholski, C., Yu, C., Miskelly, G. M., Godin, D., & Sailor, M. J. (2006). Reflective interferometric Fourier transform spectroscopy: A self-compensating label-free immunosensor using double-layers of porous SiO2. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 128, 4250–4252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Perelman, L. A., Moore, T., Singelyn, J., Sailor, M. J., & Segal, E. (2010). Preparation and characterization of a pH- and thermally responsive poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-acrylic acid)/porous SiO2 hybrid. Advanced Functional Materials, 20, 826–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Radke, S. M., & Alocilja, E. C. (2005). A microfabricated biosensor for detecting foodborne bioterrorism agents. IEEE Sensors Journal, 5, 744–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sailor, M. J., & Link, J. R. (2005). “Smart dust”: Nanostructured devices in a grain of sand. Chemical Communications, 1375–1383.Google Scholar
  27. Schwartz, M. P., Alvarez, S. D., & Sailor, M. J. (2007). Porous SiO2 interferometric biosensor for quantitative determination of protein interactions: Binding of protein a to immunoglobulins derived from different species. Analytical Chemistry, 79, 327–334.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sciacca, B., Secret, E., Pace, S., Gonzalez, P., Geobaldo, F., Quignard, F., & Cunin, F. (2011). Chitosan-functionalized porous silicon optical transducer for the detection of carboxylic acid-containing drugs in water. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 21, 2294–2302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Segal, E., Perelman, L. A., Cunin, F., di Renzo, F., Devoisselle, J. M., Li, Y. Y., & Sailor, M. J. (2007). Confinement of thermoresponsive hydrogels in nanostructured porous silicon dioxide templates. Advanced Functional Materials, 17, 1153–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Skottrup, P. D., Nicolaisen, M., & Justesen, A. F. (2008). Towards on-site pathogen detection using antibody-based sensors. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 24, 339–348.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Somasundaran, P. (2006). Encyclopedia of surface and colloid science. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  32. Stewart, M. P., & Buriak, J. M. (2000). Chemical and biological applications of porous silicon technology. Advanced Materials, 12, 859–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sundararaj, S., Guo, A., Habibi-Nazhad, B., Rouani, M., Stothard, P., Ellison, M., & Wishart, D. S. (2004). The CyberCell Database (CCDB): A comprehensive, self-updating, relational database to coordinate and facilitate in silico modeling of Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Research, 32, D293–D295.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Taylor, A. D., Ladd, J., Homola, J., & Jiang, S. (2008). Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensors for the detection of bacterial pathogens. In Z. Mohammed, E. Souna, & T. Anthony (Eds.), Principles of bacterial detection: Biosensors, recognition receptors and microsystems. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Wu, J., & Sailor, M. (2009). Chitosan hydrogel-capped porous SiO2 as a pH responsive nano-valve for triggered release of insulin. Advanced Functional Materials, 19, 733–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xia, B., Xiao, S. J., Guo, D. J., Wang, J., Chao, M., Liu, H. B., Pei, J., Chen, Y. Q., Tang, Y. C., & Liu, J. N. (2006). Biofunctionalisation of porous silicon (PS) surfaces by using homobifunctional cross-linkers. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 16, 570–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yoon, M. S., Ahn, K. H., Cheung, R. W., Sohn, H., Link, J. R., Cunin, F., & Sailor, M. J. (2003). Covalent crosslinking of 1-D photonic crystals of microporous Si by hydrosilylation and ring-opening metathesis polymerization. Chemical Communications, 680–681.Google Scholar
  38. Zhang, D., & Alocilja, E. C. (2008). Characterization of nanoporous silicon-based DNA biosensor for the detection of salmonella enteritidis. IEEE Sensors Journal, 8, 775–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Naama Massad-Ivanir
    • 1
  • Giorgi Shtenberg
    • 2
  • Ester Segal
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Biotechnology and Food EngineeringTechnion – Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.The Interdepartmental Program of BiotechnologyTechnion – Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael
  3. 3.Russell Berrie Nanotechnology Institute, Technion – Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations