Trading Gender: University Spaces as a Facilitator for Transgressive Embodiment of Women in Male-Dominated Trades

Chapter
Part of the Explorations of Educational Purpose book series (EXEP, volume 21)

Abstract

This chapter examines how the university can facilitate the embodiment of queer masculinities. Through comparing case studies of two women who worked in the carpentry trade, I explore the importance of feminism as a resource for women at work, particularly those working in male-dominated areas. Universities have been an important site for feminist education and activism. For the two cases discussed, the feminist knowledge gained at university facilitated a particularly intellectual moment in Connell’s body reflexive practice, a moment in which the gendered body engaging at work was simultaneously the feminist body intellectually engaging in reflection on itself. I argue that this reflexivity is necessary for queer embodiment and allows women in particular forms of work to embody a queer masculinity.

Keywords

Construction Worker Female Masculinity Hegemonic Masculinity Queer Theory Political Framework 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Butler, J. (2006). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge. (Original work published 1990)Google Scholar
  2. Connell, R. (1994). Psychoanalysis on masculinity. In H. Brod & M. Kaufman (Eds.), Theorizing masculinities (pp. 11–38). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Connell, R. (1995/2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). Crows Nest, NSW, Australia: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  4. Epstein, D., & Johnson, R. (1998). Schooling sexualities. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Halberstam, J. (1998). Female masculinity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Namaste, V. (2000). Invisible lives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Namaste, V. (2009). Undoing theory: The ‘transgender question’ and the epistemic violence of Anglo-American feminist theory. Hypatia, 24(3), 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Plummer, K. (2001). Documents of life 2: An invitation to a critical humanism (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Yancey Martin, P. (2003). “Said and done” versus “saying and doing”: Gendering practices, practicing gender at work. Gender and Society, 17(3), 342–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V.  2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations