The use of Direct Numerical Simulations for solving industrial flow problems

Part of the ERCOFTAC Series book series (ERCO, volume 15)

Abstract

At the end of the last decade it was shown that predictions by means of Direct Numerical Simulations (DNS) agree well with experimental results obtained with Laser Doppler Anemometry and Particle Image Velocimetry (see for example Eggels et al. (1994)) if weakly turbulent flows, i.e. low Reynolds numbers, are considered. In spite of the widely accepted merit of DNS for fundamental flow studies until now the technique could not shake off the prejudice that it is of little use for solving industrial flow problems. The reason might be that the required computational resources increase with approximately the third power of the Reynolds number and most of the industrially relevant flows, and in particular aircraft or vehicle aerodynamics, are characterized by very high Reynolds numbers. In this regard Spalart (1999) estimated in the year 1999, that it will take until 2080 for DNS to be applicable to such flows. However, in the last years we performed a number DNS-studies which are relevant for various industrial branches. The common objective of these incompressible flow simulations was to produce a reliable and comprehensive flow data base for the validation and improvement of corresponding Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations (RANS). The latter rely on turbulence models which are known to perform well for simple shear flows but not in general.

Keywords

Computational Fluid Dynamics Particle Image Velocimetry Mixed Convection Suction Side Marangoni Number 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Costa JJ, Oliveira LA and Blay D (1999) Test of several versions for the kω type turbulence modelling of internal mixed convection flows. Int. Jour. Heat and Mass Transfer 42. Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davidson L, Cokljat D, Fröhlich J et al (2003) (eds) LESFOIL Large Eddy Simulation of Flow Around a High Lift Airfoil, Notes in Numerical Fluid Mechanics, vol. 83, Springer. Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eggels JGM, Unger F, Weiss MH et al (1994) Fully developed turbulent pipe flow: a comparison between direct numerical simulation and experiment. J Fluid Mech. 268:175–209 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Günther G, Bosbach J, Pennecot J et al (2006) Experimental and numerical simulations of idealized aircraft cabin flows. Aerospace Science and Technology. 10:563–573. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Karniadakis GE and Sherwin S (1999) Spectral/HP Element Methods for CFD. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lin C-H, Horstmann RH, Ahlers MF et al (2005) Numerical Simulation of Airflow and Airborne Pathogen Transport in Aircraft Cabins Part I: Numerical Simulation of the Flow Field. In: Proc. of the ASHRAE winter meeting 2005, 755–763. Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lin C-H, Wu TT, Horstman RH et al (2006) Comparison of large eddy simulation predictions with particle image velocimetry data for airflow in a generic cabin model. HVAC&R Research, 12(3c):935–951. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shishkin A, Wagner C (2007) Direct Numerical Simulation of a Turbulent Flow Using a Spectral/hp Element Method. In: Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisziplinary Design, 92, Springer Publisher, 405–412. Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shishkina O, Shishkin A and Wagner C (2008) Simulation of turbulent thermal convection in complicated domains. J Comput and Appl Maths, doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2008.08.008. Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Spalart PR (1999) Strategies for turbulence modeling and simulations. In: Rodi W and Laurence D (eds) Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Experiments-4, Elsevier Science Ltd., 3–17 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wagner C and Friedrich R (2004) Direct Numerical Simulation of momentum and heat transport in idealized Czochralski crystal growth configuration. IJHFF 25:431–443. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Fluid Systems, Institute of Aerodynamics and Flow TechnologyGerman Aerospace Center (DLR)GöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations