Interception Storage in a Small Alpine Catchment

  • Petr Puncochar
  • Josef Krecek
  • Adriaan van de Griend

Abstract

Interception is an important process of the hydrological cycle, although it has been often neglected in hydrological considerations (Gerrits et al., 2010). Generally, interception loss is understood as a part of precipitation detained on vegetation canopy or leaf litter. Where vegetation is present, precipitation consists of gross rainfall (observed above the canopy or in a nearby open field), canopy through-fall and stem-flow. In stratified forest communities, where water drips from the canopy and is still intercepted by lower plants, secondary interception occurs. David and Gash (1989) reports the interception loss from forests in the range from 8 to 60% of the gross rainfall (from 25 to 75% of the overall evapotranspiration).

Keywords

Rainfall Amount Rutter Model Forest Practice Rainfall Interception Interception Loss 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balek, J. and Krecek, J. (1986). Regional differences in the water budget of spruce plantations (In Czech). In: Optimization of ecosystems in watersheds (In Czech), Czechoslovak Scientific and Technical Society, Prague, 82-89.Google Scholar
  2. David, J. and Gash, J. (2009). Rainfall interception. SciTopics, http://www.scitopics.com/rainfallinterception.html
  3. Gash, J.H.C., Wright, I.R. and Loyd, C.R. (1980). Comparative Estimates of Interception Loss from Three Coniferous Forest in Great Britain. Journal of Hydrology, 48: 89-105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gerrits, A.M.J., Pfister, L. and Savenije, H.H.G. (2010). Spatial and temporal variability of canopy and forest floor interception in a beech forest. Hydrological Processes, 24: 3011-3025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Helvey, J.D. (1971). A summary of rainfall interception by certain conifers of North America. In: Biological effects in hydrological cycle. Proceedings of the 3rd International Seminar for Hydrology Professors, Pardue University, July 18-30, 1971, West Lafayette (Indiana), 103-113.Google Scholar
  6. Lenzi, M. and Marchi, L. (2000). Suspended sediment load during floods in a small stream of the Dolomites (northeastern Italy). Catena, 39: 267-282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Rutter, A.J., Kershaw, K.A., Robins, P.C. and Morton, A.J. (1971). A predictive model of rainfall interception in forests. Journal of Applied Ecology, 12: 367-381.Google Scholar
  8. Zeng, N., Shuttleworth, J.W. and Gash, J.H.C. (2000). Influence of temporal variability of rainfall on interception loss. Journal of Hydrology, 228: 228-241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Capital Publishing Company 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Petr Puncochar
    • 1
  • Josef Krecek
    • 2
  • Adriaan van de Griend
    • 3
  1. 1.Aon Benfield – Impact ForecastingPragueCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of HydrologyCzech Technical University in PraguePragueCzech Republic
  3. 3.Department of Environmental StudiesFree University of AmsterdamNorth Hollandthe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations