Climate Change, Water and Agriculture in the Azov Sea Basin

  • Nikolay DroninEmail author
  • Andrei Kirilenko
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC)


The provinces of Russia and Ukraine located within the Azov sea basin are important producers of grains, sugar, sunflower, meat, and milk. Nineteen Russian provinces of the region together harvest almost half of all grain in Russia; agriculture contributes 28% to their total GDP. In Ukraine, four provinces collect 15% of grain harvested in the country. Because of heavy dependence of regional economics on agriculture, and major effects of regional agriculture on food security of the entire countries, climate change impacts on food production and water resources constitute major threats to the food security of both Russia and Ukraine. Historically, major droughts frequently affected the agriculture of the region, with resulting crop failures affecting the entire population of Russian Empire and USSR. The recent climate change seems beneficial for agriculture of the region: warmer temperatures extend growing season and elevate the accumulated heat. At the same time, further warming is not likely to be matched by higher precipitation, with negative impacts from the increasing aridity of climate. The most effective adaptation option, expansion of irrigation, is limited with high pressure on water resources, which is already high in many parts of the region.


Climate change River basin Droughts Agricultural performance Water deficit Adaptation of farming 


  1. 1.
    Ainsworth EA, Rogers A, Nelson R et al (2004) Testing the source-sink hypothesis of down-regulation of photosynthesis in elevated CO2 in the field with single gene substitutions in Glycine max. Agric For Meteorol 122:85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alcamo J, Endejan M, Golubev GN, Kirilenko AP, Dronin NM (2007) A new assessment of climate change impact on food production shortfalls and water availability in Russia. Glob Environ Change 17(3):429–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration – guidelines for computing crop water requirements, FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ashabokov BA, Bischokov RM, Derkach DV (2008) Study of changes in the regime of atmospheric precipitation in the Central North Caucasus. Russ Meteorol Hydrol 33(2):125–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dronin N, Bellinger E (2005) Climate dependence and food problems in Russia (1900–1990). CEU Press, New York/Budapest, 360 pGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dronin NM, Kirilenko AP (2008) Climate change and food stress in Russia: what if the market transforms as it did during the past century. Climatic Change 86(1–2):123–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    FAOSTAT [On-line database] (2010) Last accessed 1 June 2010
  8. 8.
    Friend AD (1998) Parameterization of a global daily weather generator for terrestrial ecosystem modeling. Ecol Model 109:121–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gifford RM (2004) The CO2 fertilizing effect – does it occur in the real world? New Phytol 163:221–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    GOSKOMSTAT (2001) Okhrana Okruzhajushej Sredy v Rossii. Sattisticheskij sbornik (Protection of the environment in Russia. Statistical report). Goskomstat, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    GOSKOMSTAT (2006) Statisticheskij ezhegodnik (Statistical yearbook). Goskomstat, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    IPCC (2000) Emissions scenarios, Cambridge University Press, UK, 570 pGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kruchkov BG, Rakovskaya LI (1990) Zernovoe khozyastvo: territorial’naya organizatsiya I efectivnost’ proizvodstva (Grain production: territorial organization and farming efficiency). MSU, Moscow (In Russian)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lobell DB, Field CB (2007) Global scale climate-crop yield relationships and the impacts of recent warming. Environ Res Lett 2(014002):1–7Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Long SP, Ainsworth EA, Leakey ADB et al (2006) Food for thought: lower expected crop yield stimulation with rising CO2 concentrations. Science 312:1918–1921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Meleshko VP, Golitsyn GS, Govorkova VA et al (2004) Anthropogenic climate changes in Russia in the 21st century: an ensemble of climate model projections. Russ Meteorol Hydrol(4), 38Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mitchell TD, Carter TR, Jones PD et al (2003) A comprehensive set of high-resolution grids of monthly climate for Europe and the globe: the observed record (1901–2000) and 16 scenarios (2001–2100), Tyndall Centre Working Paper 55. Tyndall Centre, NorwichGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mokhov II (2008) Possible regional consequences of global climate changes. Russ J Earth Sci 10Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mokhov II, Semenov VA, Ch Khon V (2003) Estimates of possible regional hydrologic regime changes in the 21st century based on global climate model Izvestiya. Atmos Ocean Phys 39(2), 130Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    New MG, Hulme M, Jones PD (2000) Representing twentieth century space-time climate variability. J Clim 13(2000):2217–2238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
    Olesen JE, Bindi M (2002) Consequences of climate change for european agricultural productivity, land use and policy. European J Agronomy 16:239–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Olesen JE, Bindi M (2004) Agricultural impacts and adaptations to climate change in Europe. Farm Policy J 1(3):36–46Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ramankutty N et al (2008) Farming the planet: 1. Geographic distribution of global agricultural lands in the year 2000. Glob Biogeochem Cycle 22(GB1003). doi:10.1029/2007GB002952Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Reilly J, Graham J, Hrubovcak J (2001) Agriculture: the potential consequences of climate variability and change for the United States, US National Assessment of the potential consequences of climate variability and change, US Global Change Research Program. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Robock A, Mu M, Vinnikov K, Trofimova IV, Adamenko TI (2005) Forty five years of observed soil moisture in the Ukraine: no summer dessication (yet). Geophys Res Lett 32, L03401, doi:10.1029/2004GL021914.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    ROSHYDROMET (2005) Strategic prediction for the period of up to 2010–2015 of climate change expected in Russia and its impact on sectors of the Russian national economy. Roshydromet, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    RUCID (2011) Russian National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage. 13 June 2011
  29. 29.
    Thornthwaite CW (1948) An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geol Review 38(1):55–94Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    TsUEG (1933) Opyt predvaritelnogo analiza vosmi katastrophicheskix zasyx za poslednii sorok let (Experience of preliminary analysis of the eight catastrophic droughts for the last forty years), Part 1. TsUEG, Moscow (In Russian)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    White C (1987) Russia and America: the roots of economic divergence. Croom Helm, London/New York/SydneyGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    World Bank (2008) Competitive agriculture or state control: Ukraine’s response to the global food crisis. Europe and Central Asia Region Sustainable Development Unit, World Bank, Washington, DC. May 2008Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wullschleger SD, Tschaplinski TJ, Norby RJ (2002) Plant water relations at elevated CO2 – implications for water-limited environments. Plant Cell Environ 25:319–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Xiao G, Liu W, Xu Q et al (2005) Effects of temperature increase and elevated CO2 concentration, with supplemental irrigation, on the yield of rain-fed spring wheat in a semiarid region of China. Agric Water Manage 74:243–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ziska LH (2003) Evaluation of yield loss in field-grown sorghum from a c3 and c4 weed as a function of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide. Weed Sci 51:914–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyMoscow State UniversityMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Department of Earth System Science and PolicyUniversity of North DakotaGrand ForksUSA

Personalised recommendations