Time Use as a Social Indicator

Chapter

Abstract

Reflecting time’s importance in everyday living and decision-making, government and academic researchers from most Western countries are collecting full 24-h time-diary data to monitor and understand how daily life differs across demographic groups, across decades, and across countries. Despite its far greater costs than simple respondent time estimates, it is argued that the diary provides a more comprehensive and accurate basis for generating national accounts of time spent working, doing housework, caring for children, caring for oneself, traveling, TV viewing, and on all the other activities that occur in free time. Diaries can also provide data on multitasking, interacting with others, and the location and timing of daily activities. For that reason, extensive diary data are now being collected on an ongoing basis by the American Time-Use Survey (ATUS) and by more than 25 other counties via the Multinational Time-Use Survey (MTUS). These diary data are being standardized and archived at the University of Oxford. In order to provide greater insight into the psychological meaning of these activities for national accounts, supplemental data are also being collected on the subjective properties of diary activities, such as activity enjoyment, tempo, purpose, and output. Several aspects, results, and conclusions from previous research are reviewed, in the context of subjective time aspects needed to provide insight into the larger meaning of daily activity.

References

  1. Aas, D. (1978). Studies of time use: Problems and prospects. Acta Sociologica, 2, 123–141.Google Scholar
  2. Abraham, K., Maitland, K., & Bianchi, S. (2006). Nonresponders to the ATUS. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70(5), 676–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abraham, K., Helam, S., & Presser, S. (2009). How social processes distort measurement: The impact of nonresponse on estimates of volunteer work in the united states. The American Journal of Sociology, 114, 1129–1165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aguiar, M., & Hurst, E. (2007). Measuring trends in leisure: The allocation of time over five decades. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 969–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aguiar, M., & Hurst, E. (2009). A summary of trends in American time allocation. Social Indicators Research, 92, 70–80.Google Scholar
  6. Allen, C. L. (1968). Photographing the TV audience. Journal of Advertising Research, 8(1), 8.Google Scholar
  7. American Time-Use Survey (2011). www.bls.gov/atus.
  8. Arthur, M. (2004). SPSS handbook. New York: Research Methods.Google Scholar
  9. Barker, R., & Barker, L. (1961). Behavior units for the comparative studies of cultures. In B. Kaplan (Ed.), Studying perso­nality cross-culturally. Evanston: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
  10. Barker, R., & Wright, H. (1951). One boy’s day: A specimen record of behavior. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
  11. Bechtel, R., Achepohl, C., & Akers, R. (1972). Correlates between observed behavior and questionnaire responses in television viewing. In E. A. Rubenstein, G. A. Comstock, & J. P. Murray (Eds.), Television and social behavior, reports and papers (Television in day to day life: Patterns and use, Vol. 4, pp. 274–344). Washington, D.C.: GPO.Google Scholar
  12. Bianchi, S., et al. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Social Forces, 79, 191–228.Google Scholar
  13. Bianchi, S., Robinson, J., & Milkie, M. (2006). Changing rhythms of American family life. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Bittman, M. (1998). The land of the long lost weekend: Trends in free time among working age Australians, 1974–1992. Society and Leisure, 21(2), 353–379.Google Scholar
  15. Bittman, M. (2000). Now it’s 2000: Trends in doing and being in the new millennium. Journal of Occupational Science, 7, 108–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bittman, M., & Ironmonger, D. (2011). Conference overview. Social Indicators Research, 101, 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brown, J., Nicholson, J., Broom, D., & Bittman, M. (2011). Television viewing by school-age children: Associations with physical activity, snack food consumption and unhealthy weight. Social Indicators Research, 101, 221–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2009). www.bls.gov.
  19. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2011). Volunteering in the United States (2010) www.bls.gov.
  20. Campbell, A., Converse, P., & Rodgers, W. (1976). The quality of American life. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Chase, D., & Godbey, G. (1983). The accuracy of self-reported participation rates: A research note. Leisure Studies, 2, 231–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Converse, P. (1972). Country differences in time use. In A. Szalai (Ed.), The use of time (pp. 145–178). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  23. CPS. (2011). Current population survey. www.census.gov/cps.
  24. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  25. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larsen, R. (1984). Being adolescent. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  26. DeGraff, J. (2003). Take back your time. New York: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  27. DeGrazia, S. (1962). Of time, work, and leisure. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.Google Scholar
  28. Fisher, K., & Robinson, J. (2011). Daily life in 23 countries. Social Indicators Research, 101, 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fisher, K., Egerton, M., Gershuny, J., & Robinson, J. (2006). Gender convergence in the American heritage time-use survey. Social Indicators Research, 82, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fisher, K., et al. (2007). Gender convergence in the American heritage time-use study. Social Indicators Research, 82, 1–33 (with Kimberly Fisher, Muriel Egerton and Jonathan Gershuny).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Folbre, N. (2009). Time use and living standards. Social Indicators Research, 93(1), 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Frazis, H., & Stewart, J. (2004). What can time-use data tell us about hours at work. Monthly Labor Review, 127(12), 3–9.Google Scholar
  33. Gauthier, A. H., Smeeding, T. M., & Furstenberg, F. F., Jr. (2004). Are parents investing less time in children? Trends in selected industrialized countries. Population and Develop­ment Review, 30, 647–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gershuny, J. (1990). The multinational longitudinal time budget data archive. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Dublin.Google Scholar
  35. Gershuny, J. (1992). Are we running out of time? Future, 24, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gershuny, J. (2000). Changing times: Work and leisure in postindustrial society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Gershuny, J., & Robinson, J. (1998). Historical changes in the household division of labor. Demography, 25(47), 537–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Goldschmidt-Claremont. (1995). Measures of unrecorded acti­vities in fourteen countries (Human Development Report #20) New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  39. Goodin, R. E., Rice, J. M., Parpo, A., & Eriksson, L. (2008). Discretionary time: A new measure of freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hadaway, C. I., Marler, P., & Chaves, M. (1993). What the polls don’t show: A closer look at U.S. Church attendance. American Sociological Review, 58, 741–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hamilton, R. (1991). Work and leisure. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 347–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Harris, L. (1987). Inside America. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  43. Harvey, A., & Elliot, D. (1983). Time and time again. Ottawa-Hull: Employment and Immigration Commission.Google Scholar
  44. Hawes, D., Talarzyk, W., & Blackwell, R. (1975). Consumer satisfactions from leisure time pursuits. In M. Schlinger (Ed.), Advances in consumer research. Chicago: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  45. Hochschild, A. (1997). The time bind. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  46. Hochschild, A., & Machung, A. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  47. Hofferth, S. (2001). How American children spend their time. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Holmes, M., & Bloxham, M. (2009). An observational method of time-use research. Social Indicators Research, 93, 245–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Independent Sector. (2001). Giving and volunteering in the United States, Washington, D.C. www.Independent Sector.org.Google Scholar
  50. Jacobs, J. (1998). Measuring time at work. Monthly Labor Review, 121, 42–53.Google Scholar
  51. Janes, M., Hamrick, K., & Lacey, J. (2011). Exercise, eating patterns, and obesity: Evidence from the ATUS and its eating & health module. Social Indicators Research, 101, 215–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Juster, F. T. (1985). The validity and quality of time use estimates obtained from recall diaries. In F. T. Juster & F. P. Stafford (Eds.), Time, goods, and well-being (pp. 63–92). Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  53. Juster, F. T., & Stafford, F. P. (1985). Time, goods, and well-being. Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  54. Juster, F. T., Ono, H., & Stafford, F. (2003). An assessment of alternative measures of time use. Sociological Methodology, 33, 19–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306(5702), 1776–1780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Krosnick, J. (1999). Question framing. In J. Robinson et al. (Eds.), Measures of political attitudes. San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  57. Krueger, A., et al. (2009). Time use and subjective well-being in the US and France. Social Indicators Research, 92, 10–20.Google Scholar
  58. Kubey, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Television and the quality of life. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  59. Levine, R. (1997). A geography of time. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  60. Marini, M., & Shelton, B. A. (1993). Measuring household work: Recent experience in the United States. Social Science Research, 22, 361–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. McSweeney, B. (1980). Lack of time as an obstacle to women: The case of upper Volta. Comparative Education Review, 24(2), 124–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Michelson, W. (1978). Public policy in temporal perspective. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  63. Michelson, W. (2006). Time use: Explanations and explorations in the social sciences. New York: Pergammon.Google Scholar
  64. Morgan, J., et al. (1965). Productive Americans. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  65. Morgan, J. N., Sirageldin, I., & Baerwaldt, N. (1966). Productive Americans. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  66. National Sleep Foundation (2007). Women and sleep. National Sleep Foundation.orgCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Nielsen/NetRatings. (1999). TV viewing in Internet households. A report by Nielsen Media Research. Retrieved from http://www.nielsen-netratings.com/.
  68. Parkinson, C. N. (1962). Parkinson’s law. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  69. Press, J., & Townsley, K. (1998). Work and housework among husbands and wives. Gender and Society, 42(2), 188–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Presser, S., & Stinson, L. (1998). Estimating the bias in survey reports of religious attendance. American Sociological Review, 63(1), 136–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  72. Raley, S. (2006). Children’s time use. In S. Bianchi, J. Robinson, & M. Milkie (Eds.), Changing rhythms of American family life. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  73. Robinson, J. P. (1977). How Americans use time: A social-psychological analysis of everyday behavior. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  74. Robinson, J. P. (1985). The validity and reliability of diaries versus alternative time use measures. In F. T. Juster & F. P. Stafford (Eds.), Time, goods, and well-being (pp. 33–62). Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  75. Robinson, J. (2010). Sex, arts and verbal abilities: Three further indicators of how American life has Not improved. Social Indicators Research, 99(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Robinson, J. (2011). IT, TV and time displacement: What Alexander Szalai anticipated but couldn’t know. Social Indicators Research, 101, 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Robinson, J. P., & Bostrom, A. (1994). The overestimated workweek? what time diary measures suggest. Monthly Labor Review, 117(8), 11–23.Google Scholar
  78. Robinson, J., & Caporaso, A. (2009). Senioritis in repose. e International Journal of Time Use Research (eIJTUR), 6 December, 306–313 (with Andrew Caporaso).Google Scholar
  79. Robinson, J. P., & Gershuny, J. I. (1994). Measuring hours of paid work: Time diary versus estimate questions. In Bulletin of labor statistics (pp. xi–xvii). Geneva: International Labor Office.Google Scholar
  80. Robinson, J. P., & Gershuny, J. I. (2009). Visualizing multinational differences in daily life. Paper presented at the 2010 IATUR conference in Paris, July 2009.Google Scholar
  81. Robinson, J. P., & Godbey, G. (1999). Time for life: The surpri­sing ways Americans use their time (2nd ed.). University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Robinson, J. & Godbey, G. (2005). Busyness as usual. Social Research, 72, 407–426.Google Scholar
  83. Robinson, J., & Land, K. (2008). Social indicators and qua­lity of life. In W. Donsbach & M. Traugott (Eds.), Hand­book of public opinion research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  84. Robinson, J., & Martin, S. (2008). What do happy people do? Social Indicators Research, 89, 565–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Robinson, J., & Martin, S. (2009). (2008) “Of time and tele­vision”. The Annals of Social and Political Science (The End of Television), 265(September), 74–87 (with Stephen Martin).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Robinson, J., & Martin, S. (2010). IT use and declining social capital: More cold water from the GSS and ATUS. Social Science Computer Review, 29(1), 45–63 (with Steven Martin).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Robinson, J. P., & Meadow, R. (1982). Polls apart. Cabin John: Seven Locks Press.Google Scholar
  88. Robinson, J., & Michelson, W. (2010). Sleep as a victim of the time crunch – a multinational analysis. e International Journal of Time-Use Research, 7(November), 61–72 (with William Michelson).Google Scholar
  89. Robinson, J., Martin, S., Glorieux, I., & Mirren, J. (2011). The overestimated workweek revisited. Monthly Labor Review, (June), pp. 1–13Google Scholar
  90. Scheuch, E. (1972). The time-budget interview. In A. Szalai et al. (Eds.), The use of time (pp. 69–89). Mouton: The Hague.Google Scholar
  91. Schor, J. (1991). The overworked American. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  92. Schuman, H., Walsh, E., Olson, C., & Etheridge, B. (1985). Effort and reward: The assumption that college grads are affected by quantity of study. Social Forces, 63, 945–966.Google Scholar
  93. Social Research (2005) Busyness Special IssueGoogle Scholar
  94. Szalai, A. (1966). Trends in comparative time budget research. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 3–8.Google Scholar
  95. Szalai, A. (1972). The use of time. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  96. Szalai, A., S. Ferge, et al. (1966, September ). The multinational comparative time-budget research project: Report on the organization, methods, and experiences of the pilot study, 1965–1966, and the preliminary results of 13 para­llel time-budget surveys. Contributions to the round table on time-budgets at the VIIth world congress of sociology, Evian, 1966.Google Scholar
  97. Verbrugge, L., & Gruber-Baldine, D. (1993). Baltimore study of activity patterns. Ann Arbor: Institute of Gerontology, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  98. Walker, K. (1969). Homemaking still takes time. Journal of Home Economics, 61(October), 621–624.Google Scholar
  99. Walker, K., & Woods, M. (1976). Time use: A measure of household production of family goods and services. Washington, D.C.: American Home Economics Association.Google Scholar
  100. Zick, K., & Stevens, R. (2011). Time spent eating and its implications for Americans’ energy balance. Social Indicators Research, 101, 267–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Netherlands 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations