Protestant Evangelical Schools and Global Citizenship Education

Part of the International Handbooks of Religion and Education book series (IHRE, volume 6)


Although Protestant Evangelical schools may not be vastly different in many ways from any other educational institutions emanating from the globalized Western cultural model, the way that Protestant schools engage with certain elements of an expanding global culture—especially some of its core tensions between particularism and universalism, and secularism and religion—does demonstrate important differences. One arena in which these differences emerge is what has become known as “global citizenship education.” This chapter examines Evangelical schools’ engagement with global citizenship education through the use of the International Baccalaureate curriculum. Protestant Evangelical education is historically associated with the expansion of a (Westernized) global culture through the missionary movement, and while clearly still steeped in Western modernity and a carrier of at least some of its myths, its engagement with global citizenship education works as a force of resistance to particular elements of the standard narrative of modernity (e.g., secularism, relativism, and universalism as against particularism). In this, they seem to be taking a path of “multiple modernities,” resisting some elements of the dominant narrative while embracing others. Protestant education, just as it has in the past, will no doubt continue to influence the development of a world society, or global culture, along these more complicated trajectories of resistance and embrace.


Education Evangelicalism Global citizenship Globalization Modernity International Baccalaureate Religion 


  1. Berger, P. L., & Huntington, S. P. (Eds.). (2002). Many globalizations: Cultural diversity in the contemporary world. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Beyer, P., & Beaman, L. (Eds.). (2007). Religion, globalization and culture. Boston, MA: Brill.Google Scholar
  3. Boli, J., Ramirez, F. O., & Meyer, J. W. (1985). Explaining the origins and expansion of mass education. Comparative Education Review, 29(2), 145–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boli, J., & Thomas, G. M. (1999). INGOs and the Organization of World Culture. In J. Boli & G. M. Thomas (Eds.), Constructing world culture: International nongovernmental organizations since 1875 (pp. 13–49). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bunnell, T. (2009). The international Baccalaureate in the USA and the emerging ‘culture war’. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 30(1), 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Calhoun, C. (2008). Secularism, citizenship and the public sphere. The Hedgehog Review, 10, 7–21.Google Scholar
  7. Chanda, N. (2007). Bound together: How traders, preachers, adventurers and warriors shaped globalization. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Conyers, A. J. (2001). The long truce: How toleration made the world safe for power and profit. Dallas, TX: Spence Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Cronin, M. (2007). Culture war reflects split between board, residents. Pittsburgh Tribune-Review (December 3). Retrieved March 10, 2010, from
  10. Dill, J. S. (2011). Schooling global citizens: The moral pedagogy of twenty-first century education. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Department of Sociology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.Google Scholar
  11. Eisenstadt, S. N. (2000). Multiple modernities. Daedalus, 129, 1–29.Google Scholar
  12. Featherstone, M. (Ed.). (1990). Global culture: Nationalism, globalization and modernity. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Frank, D., Wong, S., Meyer, J., & Ramirez, F. (2000). What counts as history: A cross-national and longitudinal study of university curricula. Comparative Education Review, 44(1), 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Galston, W. A. (1991). Liberal purposes: Goods, virtues, and diversity in the liberal state. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gaudelli, W., & Heilman, E. (2009). Reconceptualizing geography as democratic global citizenship education. Teachers College Record, 111, 2647–2677.Google Scholar
  16. Hunter, J. D. (1983). American evangelicalism: Conservative religion and the quandary of modernity. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hunter, J. D. (1987). Evangelicalism: The coming generation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hunter, J. D., & Yates, J. (2002). In the vanguard of globalization: The world of American globalizers. In P. L. Berger & S. P. Huntington (Eds.), Many globalizations: Cultural diversity in the contemporary world (pp. 323–357). New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  19. Keane, W. (2007). Christian moderns: Freedom and fetish in the mission encounter. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Lechner, F. J. (2009). Globalization: The making of world society. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Lechner, F. J., & Boli, J. (2005). World culture: Origins and consequences. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  22. McEneaney, E. H., & Meyer, J. W. (2000). The content of the curriculum: An institutionalist perspective. In M. T. Hallinan (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of education (pp. 189–211). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Meyer, J. W. (2009). World society: The writings of John W. Meyer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., & Thomas, G. (1987). Ontology and rationalization in the western cultural account. In G. Thomas, J. W. Meyer, F. O. Francisco, & J. Boli (Eds.), Institutional structure: Constituting state, society, and the individual (pp. 12–37). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Meyer, J. W., Kamens, D. H., & Benavot, A. (1992). School knowledge for the masses: World models and national primary curricular categories in the twentieth century. Washington, DC: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  26. Neem, J. N. (2009). The universe in a grain of sand? Cosmopolitanism and nationalism reconsidered: A review of Seyla Benhabib’s Another Cosmopolitanism, Kwame Anthony Appiah’s Cosmopolitanism, and Craig Calhoun’s Nations Matter. The Hedgehog Review, 11, 51–58.Google Scholar
  27. Peterson, A. D. C. (1987). Schools across frontiers: The story of the international Baccalaureate and the united world colleges. LaSalle, IL: Open Court Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. Ramirez, F. O. (1997). The nation-state, citizenship, and educational change: Institutionalization and globalization. In W. K. Cummings & N. F. McGinn (Eds.), International handbook of education and development: Preparing schools, students and nationals for the twenty-first century (pp. 47–62). Exeter: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  29. Ramirez, F. O., & Boli, J. (1987). Global patterns of educational institutionalization. In G. Thomas, J. W. Meyer, F. O Francisco, & J. Boli (Eds.), Institutional structure: Constituting state, society, and the individual (pp. 150–172). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  30. Rauner, M. (1998). The worldwide globalization of civics education topics from 1955 to 1995. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). School of Education, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  31. Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization: Social theory and global culture. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  32. Ritzer, G. (1996). The McDonaldization of society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  33. Seligman, A. B. (2004). Modest claims: Dialogues and essays on tolerance and tradition. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  34. Stambach, A. (2003). World cultural and anthropological interpretations of ‘choice programming’ in Tanzania. In K. Anderson-Levitt (Ed.), Local meanings, global schooling (pp. 141–160). New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  35. Stambach, A. (2010). Faith in schools: Religion, education, and American Evangelicals in East Africa. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Suarez, D. F. (2006). The institutionalization of human rights education. In D. P. Baker & A. W. Wiseman (Eds.), The impact of comparative education research on institutional theory, vol. 7, international perspectives on education and society (pp. 95–120). San Diego, CA: Elsevier JAI Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Suarez, D. F., & Ramirez, F. O. (2007). Human rights and citizenship: The emergence of human rights education. In C. A. Torres &. A. Teodoro (Eds.), Critique and utopia: New developments in the sociology of education in the twenty-first century (pp. 43–64). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  38. Suarez, D. F., Ramirez, F. O., & Koo, J. (2009). UNESCO and the associated schools project: Symbolic affirmation of world community, international understanding, and human rights. Sociology of Education, 82(3), 197–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Taylor, C. (1994). The politics of recognition. In A. Gutmann (Ed.), Multiculturalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Tomlinson, J. (1999). Globalization and culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  41. Wagner, M. B. (1990). God’s schools: Choice and compromise in American society. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Walzer, M. (1994). Thick and thin: Moral argument at home and abroad. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  43. Yates, J. J. (2002). American evangelicals: The overlooked globalizers and their unintended gospel of modernity. The Hedgehog Review, 4, 2.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology, Institute for Advanced Studies in CultureUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations