Advertisement

Procedural and Declarative Memory in the Acquisition of Morphological Knowledge: A Model for Second Language Acquisition in Adults

  • Sara FermanEmail author
  • Avi Karni
Chapter
Part of the Literacy Studies book series (LITS, volume 5)

Abstract

Although there is a dominant notion that adults have a reduced and rather less effective language learning ability, there is ample evidence suggesting that the acquisition (learning) and retention (long-term memory) of procedural (skills) as well as declarative (facts, singular events) non-linguistic knowledge are robust in healthy adults. We investigated the effects of intensive, multi-session training on an artificial morphological rule (AMR) in adults, and tested whether key characteristics of non-linguistic skills are recognizable in linguistic rule learning. The AMR constituted phonological transformations of verbs expressing a semantic distinction, and was applied to repeated and new items. All participants learned to apply the AMR to repeated items, demonstrating key characteristics of procedural memory acquisition including group-average power-law like improvement in speed and accuracy, gains evolving both within-session and between-sessions (consolidation phase), and robust retention. The generalization to new items evolved separately for the phonological and semantic aspects of the AMR. Phonological aspects were rapidly generalized by all participants, independently of explicit (declarative) knowledge. However, the generalization of the semantic aspect required explicit discovery of its requisite role, and was not universally attained; when attained, additional training resulted in a further proceduralization phase. Our results show that adults are highly competent in acquiring and retaining linguistic knowledge, with both memory systems contributing differentially to the learning of distinct aspects of the morphological rule at different stages along the mastering of skilled linguistic performance. This is in line with a growing body of evidence suggesting that adults are as competent as, and often better than, children in acquiring and retaining non-linguistic skills.

Keywords

Procedural memory Declarative memory Language learning Adults Artificial language Morphology 

References

  1. Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., & Qin, Y. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111, 1036–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ari-Even Roth, D., Kishon-Rabin, L., Hildesheimer, M., & Karni, A. (2005). A latent consolidation phase in auditory identification learning: Time in the awake state is sufficient. Learning and Memory, 12, 159–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates, E., Devescovi, A., & Wulfeck, B. (2001). Psycholinguistics: A cross-language perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 369–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bates, E., & Goodman, J. C. (1997). On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: Evidence from acquisition, aphasia, and real-time processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 507–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berman, R. A. (Ed.). (2004). Language development across childhood and adolescence: Crosslinguistic perspectives. TILAT (Trends in Language Acquisition Research) Series. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  6. Bialystok, E. (1982). On the relationship between knowing and using linguistic forms. Applied Linguistics, 3, 181–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bitan, T., & Karni, A. (2003). Alphabetical knowledge from whole words training: Effects of explicit instruction and implicit experience on learning script segmentation. Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 323–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bitan, T., Manor, D., Morocz, A., & Karni, A. (2005). Effects of alphabetically, practice and type of instruction on reading an artificial script: An fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 90–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Braine, M. D. S., Brody, R. E., & Brooks, P. J. (1990). Exploring language acquisition in children with miniature artificial language: Effects of item and pattern frequency, arbitrary subclasses, and correction. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 591–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cleeremans, A., Destrebecqz, A., & Boyer, M. (1998). Implicit learning: News from the front. Trends in Cognitive Science, 2, 406–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, N., & Poldrack, R. A. (1997). Memory for items and memory for relations in the procedural/declarative memory framework. Memory, 5, 131–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dahan, D., & Brent, M. (1999). On the discovery of novel wordlike units from utterances: An artificial-language study with implications for native-language acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 165–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DeKeyser, R. (1997). Beyond explicit rule learning: Automatizing second language morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 195–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DeKeyser, R. M. (2001). Automaticity and automatization. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 125–151). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. DeKeyser, R. M. (2005). What makes learning second language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning, 55(Suppl 1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Devescovi, A., Caselli, M. C., Marchione, D., Pasqualetti, P., Reilly, J., & Bates, E. (2005). A cross linguistic study of relationship between grammar and lexical development. Journal of Child Language, 32, 759–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dionne, G., Dale, P. S., Boivin, M., & Plomin, R. (2003). Genetic evidence for bidirectional effects of early lexical and grammatical development. Child Development, 74, 394–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dorfberger, S., Adi-Japha, E., & Karni, A. (2007). Reduced susceptibility to interference in the consolidation of motor memory before adolescence. PloS One, 2, e240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ellis, N. (1994). Vocabulary acquisition: The implicit ins and outs of explicit cognitive mediation. In N. Ellis (Ed.) Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 211–283). London: Academic.Google Scholar
  21. Ellis, N., & Schmidt, R. (1998). Rules or associations in the acquisition of morphology? The frequency by regularity interaction in human and PDP learning of morphosyntax. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 307–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Elman, J., Bates, E., Johnson, M., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Ferman, S., & Karni, A. (2010). No childhood advantage in the acquisition of skill in using an artificial language rule. PLoS One, 5(10), e13648. Retrieved October 27, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ferman, S., Olshtain, E., Schechtman, E., & Karni, A. (2009). The acquisition of a linguistic skill by adults: Procedural and declarative memory interact in the learning of an artificial morphological rule. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22, 384–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gomez, R. L. (1997). Transfer and complexity in artificial grammar learning. Cognitive Psychology, 33, 154–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gomez, L. R., & Gerken, L. (2000). Infants artificial language learning and language acquisition. Trend in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 178–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Haskell, T., McDonald, M., & Seidenberg, M. (2003). Language learning and innateness: Some implications of compound research. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 119–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hauptmann, B., & Karni, A. (2002). From primed to learn: The saturation of repetition priming and the induction of long-term memory. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 13, 313–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Techman Fitch, W. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569–1579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hulstijn, J. H. (1997). Second language acquisition research in the research lab: Possibilities and limitations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Joanisse, M. F., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Impairments in verb morphology after brain injury: A connectionist model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96, 7592–7597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnson, K. (1996). Language teaching and skill learning. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  33. Karni, A. (1996). The acquisition of perceptual and motor skills: A memory system in the adult human cortex. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 5, 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Karni, A., & Sagi, D. (1993). The time course of learning a visual skill. Nature, 365, 250–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Knowlton, B. J., & Squire, L. R. (1996). Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplar-specific information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Korman, M., Raz, N., Flash, T., & Karni, A. (2003). From novelty to familiarity: Practice makes transfer imperfect. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA of America, 100, 12492–12497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Logan, G. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. MacKay, D. G. (1982). The problems of flexibility, fluency, and speed-accuracy trade off in skilled behavior. Psychological Review, 89, 483–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. MacWhinney, B. (1983). Miniature linguistic systems as tests of the use of universal operating principles in second language learning by children and adults. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 12, 467–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Maquet, P., Laureys, S., Perrin, F., Ruby, P., Melchior, G., Boly, M., et al. (2003). Festina lente: Evidences for fast and slow learning processes and a role for sleep in human motor skill learning. Learning and Memory, 10, 237–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mathews, R. C., Buss, R. R., Staneley, W. B., Blanchard-Fields, F., Cho, J. R., & Druhan, B. (1989). Role of implicit and explicit processes in learning from examples: A synergistic effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1083–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McLeod, B., & McLaughlin, B. (1986). Restructuring or automaticity? Reading in a second language. Language Learning, 36, 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mishkin, M., Malamut, B., & Bachevalier, J. (1988). Memories and habits: Two neural systems. In G. Lynch, J. L. McGaugh, & N. W. Weinburger (Eds.), The neurobiology of learning and memory (pp. 64–88). New York: Guliford.Google Scholar
  44. Nippold, M. A. (2007). Later language development: School-age children, adolescents, and young adults (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  45. Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
  46. Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  47. Poldrack, R., & Packard, M. G. (2003). Competition among multiple memory systems: Converging evidence from animal and human brain studies. Neuropsychologia, 41, 245–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pothos, E. M. (2007). Theories of artificial grammar learning. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 227–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reber, P. J., Knowlton, B., & Squire, L. (1996). Dissociable properties of memory systems: Differences in the flexibility of declarative and nondeclarative knowledge. Behavioral Neuroscience, 110, 861–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Robertson, E. M., & Cohen, D. A. (2006). Understanding consolidation through the architecture of memories. Neuroscientist, 12, 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Robinson, P. (1996). Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental rule search and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 27–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Robinson, P., & Ha, M. A. (1993). Instance theory and second language rule learning under explicit conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 413–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Saffran, J. R. (2002). Constraints on statistical language learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 172–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Saffran, J. R., Johnson, E. K., Alsin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1999). Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults. Cognition, 70, 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Saffran, J., Newport, E., & Alsin, R. (1996). Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 606–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schmidt, R. (1993). Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 357–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Segalowitz, N. (2003). Automaticity and second languages. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 382–340). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  59. Sosnik, R., Hauptman, B., Karni, A., & Flash, T. (2004). When practice leads to coarticulation: The evolution of geometrically defined movement primitives. Experimental Brain Research, 156, 422–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Squire, L. R., & Zola, S. M. (1996). Structure and function of declarative and nondeclarative memory systems. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA of America, 93, 13515–13522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stadler, M. A. (1989). On learning complex procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 1061–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sun, R., & Zhang, X. (2004). Top-down versus bottom-up learning in cognitive skill acquisition. Cognitive Systems Research, 5, 63–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ullman, M. T. (2004). Contribution of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92, 231–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ullman, M. T. (2001). A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model. Nature Review Neuroscience, 2, 717–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Walker, M. P., & Stickgold, R. (2006). Sleep, memory, and plasticity. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 139–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Communication Disorders, Sackler Faculty of MedicineTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  2. 2.Laboratory for Functional Brain Imaging and Learning Research, Faculties of Science and EducationUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations