The Education Gospel and Vocationalism in US Higher Education: Triumphs, Tribulations, and Cautions for Other Countries

Chapter
Part of the Technical and Vocational Education and Training: Issues, Concerns and Prospects book series (TVET, volume 15)

Abstract

The education gospel, both in the United States and in other countries, calls for increasing levels of education and orienting schools and colleges around preparation for occupations. In the United States this has led to vocationalizing the university as well as other levels of schooling. This trend over more than a century has made the American university the primary avenue for individual mobility and a crucial source of research for national and regional growth. However, these changes have also created several dilemmas for the professionalized university including the demise of liberal or general education, a number of critiques of professional education, utilitarian and narrow conceptions of education among students, the dangers of overeducation, and serious equity effects. The result is that, even though everyone wants access to the American university, no one is satisfied with it. The chapter also explores the history of American and German borrowing from one another. These have often been based on mistaken assumptions about the other country’s practices, and some current German reforms seem likely to follow this pattern.

Keywords

High Education Community College Formal Schooling Liberal Education American High Education 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Tobias Schulze-Cleven, Esther Winter, and an anonymous referee made helpful comments on an earlier draft.

References

  1. Astin, A. (1998). The changing American college student: Thirty-year trends, 1966–1996. Review of Higher Education, 21(2), 115–135.Google Scholar
  2. Barro, R. (2000). Inequality and growth in a panel of countries. Journal of Economic Growth, 5, 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berg, I., & Gorelick, S. (1970). Education and jobs: The great training robbery. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Bird, C. (1975). The case against college. New York: David McKay.Google Scholar
  5. Bledstein, B. (1978). The culture of professionalism: The middle class and the development of higher education in America. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  6. Braverman, H. (1974). Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  7. Breneman, D. (1994). Liberal arts college: Thriving, surviving, or endangered?. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  8. Brint, S. (2002). The rise of the “practical arts”. In S. Brint (Ed.), The future of the city of intellect: The changing American university (pp. 231–259). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brint, S., Riddle, M., Turk-Bicakci, L., & Levy, C. (2002, August). Colleges and universities of the “practical arts”: Correlates of a resurgent form. Department of Sociology, University of California, Riverside.Google Scholar
  10. Cox, R. (2009). The college fear factor. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Daly, M., Büchel, F., & Duncan, G. (2000). Premiums and penalties for surplus and deficit education: Evidence from the United States and Germany. Economics of Education Review, 19, 169–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dewey, J., & Dewey, E. (1915). Schools of to-morrow. New York: E.P. Dutton.Google Scholar
  13. Douglas, J. (2000). The California idea and American higher education: 1850 to the 1960 master plan. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Douglas, P. (1921). American apprenticeship and industrial education. Studies in History, Economics, and Public Law Vol. XCV, No. 2. New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
  15. Dunham, E. A. (1969). Colleges of the forgotten Americans: A profile of state colleges and regional universities. Carnegie Commission on Higher Education. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  16. Eck, A. (1993). Job-related education and training: Their impact on earnings. Monthly Labor Review, 116(10), 21–38.Google Scholar
  17. Esping-Anderson, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Freeman, R. (1976). The over-educated American. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  19. Geiger, R. (2000). The era of multi-purpose colleges in American higher education, 1850–1890. In R. Geiger (Ed.), The American college in the nineteenth century (pp. 127–152). Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Goodlad, J. (1984). A place called school: Prospects for the future. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  21. Groot, W., & Van den Brink, H. M. (2000). Over-education in the labor market: A meta-analysis. Economics of Education Review 19, 149–158.Google Scholar
  22. Grubb, W. N. (2004). The Anglo-American approach to vocationalism: The economic roles of education in England. Research Paper 52. Oxford University: Centre on Skills, Knowledge, and Organisational Performance (SKOPE).Google Scholar
  23. Grubb, W. N. (2009). The money Myth: School resources, outcomes, and equity. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  24. Grubb, W. N., & Lazerson, M. (2004). The education Gospel: The economic power of schooling. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Grubb, W. N., & Sweet, R. (2005). Alternative to universities revisited. In R. Sweet & D. Hirsch (Eds.), Education policy analysis 2004 (pp. 15–46). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  26. Hartog, J. (2000). Over-education and earnings: Where are we, where should we go? Economics of Education Review, 19, 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Immerwahr, J., & Foleno, T. (2000, May). Great expectations: How the public and parents—White, African, and Hispanic— view higher education. New York: Public Agenda Foundation.Google Scholar
  28. Jones, B. (1984). Sleepers, wake! Technology and the future of work. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Kerr, C. (1991). The new race to be Harvard or Berkeley or Stanford. Change, 23(3), 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kett, J. (1994). The pursuit of knowledge under difficulties: From self-improvement to adult education in America, 1750–1990. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kwon, D. B. (2001). Adult education in Korea. Unpublished paper, College of Education, Korea University, Seoul.Google Scholar
  32. Labaree, D. (1997, Spring). Public goods, private goods: The American struggle over educational goals. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 39–81.Google Scholar
  33. Landau, R. T., Taylor, T., & Wright, G. (1996). The mosaic of economic growth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Lazerson, M. (1998). The disappointments of success: Higher education after World War II. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 559, 64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Levine, D. (1986). The American college and the culture of aspiration, 1915–1940. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  36. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for education reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  37. OECD. (2001). Education policy analysis: Education and skills. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  38. Pope, Denise. 2001. Doing school: How we are creating a generation of stressed out, materialistic, and miseducated students. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Reuben, J. (1996). The making of the modern university: Intellectual transformation and the marginalization of morality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. Riley, J. (1979). Testing the educational screening hypothesis. Journal of Political Economy, 87(5), part 2:S227–S252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rosenbaum, J. (2001). Beyond college for all: Career paths for the forgotten half. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Rumberger, R. (1981). Over-education in the U. S. labor market. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  43. Smith, V. (1993). Phantom students: Student mobility and general education. AAHE Bulletin, 45(10), 10–13, 7.Google Scholar
  44. Sullivan, W. (1995). Work and integrity: The crisis and promise of professionalism in America. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
  45. Van Hise, C. (1904). Inaugural address of president Charles Richard Van Hise. Science, 12(August), 193–205.Google Scholar
  46. Veysey, L. (1965). The Emergence of the American University. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  47. Wolf, A. (2002). Does education matter? Myths about education and economic growth. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  48. Wolff, E. (2006). Does education really help? Skill, work, and inequality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.Department of Public PolicyCentral European UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations