Resolution of Issues Related to Proxy Decision Making

Chapter
Part of the Philosophy and Medicine book series (PHME, volume 112)

Abstract

The content of this brief final chapter has been organized around two goals. First, the critique of mainstream accounts of proxy decision making and the minimal-risk controversy, both previously discussed, will be revisited in the light of the fundamental principles of objective morality as laid out by the Magisterium of the Catholic Church. These principles relate to the objective human good and aim at the protection of human dignity. As such they include objective truth, in particular absolute moral norms prohibiting intrinsically evil acts, together with conscience and virtue. While enlarging upon these principles, I will also refer to a number of major consent-related issues that impair both the human-rights documents and some of the analyses of informed consent addressed in previous chapters. In doing so, I will also provide a brief summary highlighting major moral issues detected in the course of this study.

Keywords

Human Dignity Common Good Moral Truth Proxy Consent Objective Morality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Flannery, A., ed. 2004. Vatican Council II. The Conciliar and Post Conciliar Documents, vol. 1. Dublin and Northport, NY: Dominican Publications & Costello Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  2. Lee, P. 2001. “Personhood, Dignity, Suicide, and Euthanasia.” The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 1(3):329–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. May, W. E. 2000. Catholic Bioethics and the Gift of Human Life (1st ed.). Huntington, IN: Our Sunday Visitor Publishing Division.Google Scholar
  4. May, W. E. 2003a. An Introduction to Moral Theology (2nd ed.). Huntington, IN: Our Sunday Visitor Publishing Division.Google Scholar
  5. McCormick, R. A. 1979. “Reflections on the Literature.” In Readings in Moral Theology, No. 1. Moral Norms and Catholic Tradition, edited by Ch. E. Curran and R. A. McCormick, 294–340. New York, NY: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
  6. McCormick, R. A. 1981a. Notes on Moral Theology: 1965 Through 1980. Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  7. McCormick, R. A. 1998. “Some Early Reactions to Veritatis Splendor.” In Readings in Moral Theology, No.10. John Paul II and Moral Theology, edited by Ch. E. Curran and R. A. McCormick, 5–34. New York, NY and Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
  8. McCormick, R. A. 2006. The Critical Calling. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  9. McInerny, R. M. 1997. Ethica Thomistica: The Moral Philosophy of Thomas Aquinas (revised ed.). Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
  10. Pellegrino, E. D., and D. C. Thomasma. 1993. The Virtues in Medical Practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Pieper, J. 1966. The Four Cardinal Virtues: Prudence, Justice, Fortitude, Temperance. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ratzinger, J. 2007. “Conscience and Truth.” In On Conscience, edited by J. Ratzinger, 11–41. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press.Google Scholar
  13. Smith, M. A. 1995. Human Dignity and the Common Good in the Aristotelian-Thomistic Tradition. Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
  14. Benedict XVI. 2008a. Address to Catholic Educators at the Catholic University of America [On-line] Accessed August 16, 2008. http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/speeches/2008/april/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20080417_cath-univ-washington_en.html
  15. Benedict XVI. 2008b. Address to the Members of the General Assembly of the United Nations Organization [On-line] Accessed August 19, 2008. http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/speeches/2008/april/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20080418_un-visit_en.html
  16. Catechism of the Catholic Church (2nd ed.). 1997. New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  17. Fisher, A., O.P. 2007. “The Moral Conscience in Ethics and the Contemporary Crisis of Authority.” Paper presented at the International Congress The Christian Conscience in Support of the Right to Life at the XIII General Assembly of the Pontifical Academy for Life, Vatican City, February 23–25 [On-line] Accessed August 18, 2008. http://www.academiavita.org/italiano/AssembleaGenerale/2007/rel2007/eng/fishereng2007.pdf
  18. John Paul II. 2004. Letter on the Occasion of the 23rd National Congress of the Italian Catholic Physicians' Association [On-line] Accessed August 16, 2008. http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/letters/2004/documents/hf_jp-ii_let_20041109_medici-cattolici_en.html
  19. John Paul II. 1993. Encyclical Letter “Veritatis Splendor” [On-line] Accessed August 16, 2008. http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_06081993_veritatis-splendor_en.html
  20. John Paul II. 1997. Address During the Meeting with the Rectors of the Polish Universities [On-line] Accessed August 16, 2008. http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/travels/documents/hf_jp-ii_spe_08061997_universities_en.html
  21. John Paul II. 1999. Message for the World Day of the Sick for the Year 2000 [On-line] Accessed August 20, 2008. http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/messages/sick/documents/hf_jp-ii_mes_19990806_world-day-of-the-sick-2000_en.html
  22. Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace. 2004. Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church. Washington, DC: Libreria Editrice Vaticana & United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dominican College of Philosophy and TheologyKrakówPoland

Personalised recommendations