Geowave Validation with Case Studies: Accurate Geology Reproduces Observations
Boussinesq wave models have been introduced in tsunami science with considerable success. Methodical simulations of case studies provide a critical form of validation for these models. In current simulation techniques, developed since the 1998 Papua New Guinea event, carefully derived tsunami sources are input into a fourth order Boussinesq water wave simulation code (Geowave) capable of capturing wave dissipation, wave breaking, wave dispersion, and nonlinear wave activity. When the tsunami source is known, almost all tsunami observations can be captured with a single, direct Boussinesq simulation. Here, we summarize case studies for the following events: 125 k BP, Alika 2, Hawaii, US, 1908 Messina Strait, Italy, 1946 Unimak, Alaska, US, 1998 Sissano, Papua New Guinea, among other tsunami events.
KeywordsBoussinesq Earthquake Landslide Volcano Tsunami Mass failure Case studies Validation Runup Edge wave Breaking wave Convergence Grid size
D. Tappin publishes with the permission of the Executive Director, British Geological Survey, NERC, United Kingdom.
- Ioualalen M, Pelletier B, Watts P, Regnier M (2006) Numerical modeling of the 26th November 1999 Vanuatu tsunami. J Geophys Res 111(C6). doi: 10.1029/2005JC003249
- Ioualalen M, Asavanant J, Kaewbanjak N, Grilli ST, Kirby JT, Watts P (2007) Modeling the 26 December 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami: case study of impact in Thailand. J Geophys Res 112. doi: 10.1029/2006JC003850
- Kirby JT, Wei G, Chen Q, Kennedy AB, Dalrymple RA (1998) FUNWAVE 1.0. Fully nonlinear Boussinesq wave model. Documentation and user’s manual. Report CACR-98-06, Center for Applied Coastal Research, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Delaware, NewarkGoogle Scholar
- Kirby JT, Pophet N, Shi F, Grilli ST (2009) Basin scale tsunami propagation modeling using Boussinesq models: parallel implementation in spherical coordinates. In: Proceedings of the WCCE-ECCE-TCCE joint conference on earthquake and tsunami, Istanbul, 22–24 June, paper 100Google Scholar
- Mattioli GS, Voight B, Linde AT, Watts P, Widiwijayanti C, Young SR, Elsworth D, Malin PE, Shalev E, Van Boskirk E, Johnston W, Sparks RSJ, Neuberg J, Bass V, Dunkley P, Herd R, Syers T, Williams P, Williams D (2007) Unique and remarkable dilatometer measurements of pyroclastic flow–generated tsunamis. Geology 35(1):25–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Okada S (1985) Surface displacement due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space. Bull Seismol Soc Am 75:1135–1154Google Scholar
- Tappin DR, Watts P, Grilli ST, Dubosq S, Billi A, Pophet N, Marani MP (2008b) The 1908 Messina tsunami some comments on the source: earthquake, submarine landslide or a combination of both? Eos Trans AGU 89(53): Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract S41D-07Google Scholar
- Tinti S, Armigliato A (2003) The use of scenarios to evaluate the tsunami impact in southern Italy. Mar Geol 199(221)Google Scholar
- Watts P (2006) Case study of the 1755 Portugal tsunami. Private consulting reportGoogle Scholar