Arctic Climate Change pp 405-436

Part of the Atmospheric and Oceanographic Sciences Library book series (ATSL, volume 43)

Global Climate Models and 20th and 21st Century Arctic Climate Change

  • Cecilia M. Bitz
  • Jeff K. Ridley
  • Marika Holland
  • Howard Cattle


We review the history of global climate model (GCM) development with regard to Arctic climate beginning with the ACSYS era. This was a time of rapid improvement in many models. We focus on those aspects of the Arctic climate system that are most likely to amplify the Arctic response to anthropogenic greenhouse gas forcing in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. Lessons from past GCM modeling and the most likely near-future model developments are discussed. We present highlights of GCM simulations from two sophisticated climate models that have the highest Arctic amplification among the the models that participated in the World Climate Research Programme’s third Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP3). The two models are the Hadley Center Global Environmental Model (HadGEM1) and the Community Climate System Model version 3 (CCSM3). These two models have considerably larger climate change in the Arctic than the CMIP3 model mean by mid-twenty-first century. Thus, the surface warms by about 50% more on average north of 75N in HadGEM1 and CCSM3 than in the CMIP3 model mean, which amounts to more than three times the global average warming. The sea ice thins and retreats 50–100% more in HadGEM1 and CCSM3 than in the CMIP3 model mean. Further, the oceanic transport of heat into the Arctic increases much more in HadGEM1 and CCSM3 than in other CMIP3 models and contributes to the larger climate change.


  1. Arzel O, Fichefet T, Goosse H (2006) Sea ice evolution over the 20th and 21st centuries as ­simulated by the current AOGCMs. Ocean Model 12:401–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beesley JA, Moritz RE (1999) Toward an explanation of the annul cycle of cloudiness over the arctic ocean. J Clim 12:395–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bitz CM, Lipscomb WH (1999) An energy-conserving thermodynamic model of sea ice. J Geophys Res 104:15,669–15,677Google Scholar
  4. Bitz CM, Roe GH (2004) A mechanism for the high rate of sea-ice thinning in the arctic ocean. J Clim 18:3622–3631Google Scholar
  5. Bitz CM, Holland MM, Weaver AJ, Eby M (2001) Simulating the ice-thickness distribution in a coupled climate model. J Geophys Res 106:2441–2464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bitz CM, Fyfe JC, Flato GM (2002) Sea ice response to wind forcing from amip models. J Clim 15:522–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bitz CM, Holland MM, Hunke EC, Moritz RE (2005) On the maintenance of the sea-ice edge. J Clim 18:2903–2921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bitz CM, Gent PR, Woodgate RA, Holland MM, Lindsay R (2006) The influence of sea ice on ocean heat uptake in response to increasing CO2. J Clim 19:2437–2450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bourke RH, Garrett RP (1987) Sea ice thickness distribution in the arctic ocean. Cold Reg Sci Tech 13:259–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boville BA, Gent PR (1998) The NCAR climate system model, version one. J Clim 11:1115–1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Briegleb BP, Light B (2007) A Delta-Eddington multiple scattering parameterization for solar radiation in the sea ice component of the community climate system model. NCAR/TN-472+STRGoogle Scholar
  12. Briegleb BP, Bitz CM, Hunke EC, Lipscomb WH, Schramm JL (2004) Scientific Description of the sea ice component in the community climate system model, version 3. NCAR/TN-463+STRGoogle Scholar
  13. Budyko MI (1969) The effect of solar radiatin variations on the climate of the earth. Tellus 21:611–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cassano JJ, Uotila P, Lynch AH (2006) Changes in synoptic weather patterns in the polar regions in the 20th and 21st centuries. Part 1. Arctic. Int J Climatol 26. doi:10.1002/JOC.1306Google Scholar
  15. Chapman WL, Walsh JE (2007) Simulation of arctic temperature and pressure by global climate models. J Clim 20:609–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Collins WD et al (2006) The community climate system model, Version 3. J Clim 19:2122–2143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Comiso JC (1995) SSM/I concentrations using the Bootstrap Algorithm. Tech Rep RP 1380, 40 pp, NASA, Technical ReportGoogle Scholar
  18. Curry JA, Rossow WB, Randall D, Schramm JL (1996) Overview of arctic cloud and radiation charactereistics. J Clim 9:1731–1764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Delworth TL et al (2006) CM2 global coupled climate models – part 1: formulation and simulation characteristics. J Clim 19:675–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dethloff K, Rinke A, Lynch A, Dorn W, Saha S, Handorf D (2008) Chapter 8: Arctic regional climate models. In: Arctic climate change — The ACSYS decade and beyond, this volumeGoogle Scholar
  21. deWeaver E, Bitz CM (2006) Atmospheric circulation and Arctic sea ice in CCSM3 at medium and high resolution. J Clim 19:2415–2436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Driesschaert E, Fichefet T, Goosse H, Huybrechts P, Janssens L, Mouchet A, Munhove G, Brovkin V, Weber SL (2007) Modeling the influence of greenland ice sheet melting on the atlantic meridional overturning circulation during the next millennia. Geophys Res Lett 34:L10707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ebert EE, Curry JA (1993) An intermediate one-dimensional thermodynamic sea ice model for investigating ice-atmosphere interactions. J Geophys Res 98:10,085–10,109Google Scholar
  24. Fichefet T, Morales Maqueda M (1997) Sensitivity of a global sea ice model to the treatment of ice thermodynamics and dynamics. J Geophys Res 102:12,609–12,646Google Scholar
  25. Flato GM (2004) Sea-ice climate and sensitivity as simulated by several global climate models. Clim Dyn 23:229–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Flato GM, Hibler WD (1992) Modeling pack ice as a cavitating fluid. J Phys Oceanogr 22:626–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gent PR, McWilliams JC (1990) Isopycnal mixing in ocean circulation models. J Phys Oceanogr 20:150–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gent PR, Craig AP, Bitz CM, Weatherly JW (2002) Parameterization improvements in an eddy-permitting ocean model. J Clim 13:1447–1459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gerdes R, Köberle C (2007) Comparison of arctic sea ice thickness variability in IPCC climate of the 20th century experiments and in ocean sea ice hindcasts. J Geophys Res 112:C04S13. doi:10.1029/2006JC003,616Google Scholar
  30. Girard E, Blanchet JP (2001) Simulation of arctic diamond dust, ice fog, and thin stratus using an explicit aerosol-cloud-radiation model. J Atmos Sci 58:1199–1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gleckler PJ, Taylor KE, Doutriaux C (2008) Performance metrics for climate models. J Geophys Res 113:D06,104. doi:10.1029/2007JD008,972Google Scholar
  32. Gordon C, Cooper C, Senior CA, Banks HT, Gregory JM, Johns TC, Mitchell JFB, Wood RA (2000) The simulation of SST, sea ice extents and ocean heat transports in a version of the Hadley Centre coupled model without flux adjustments. Clim Dyn 16:147–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gordon HB, O’Farrell SP (1997) Transient climate change in the CSIRO coupled model with dynamics sea ice. Mon Weather Rev 125:875–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gorodetskaya IV, Tremblay L-B, Lipert B, Cane MA, Cullather RI (2007) Modification of the arctic ocean short-wave radiation budget due to cloud and sea ice properties in coupled models and observations. J Climate 21:866–882Google Scholar
  35. Gregory JM, Huybrechts P (2006) Ice-sheet contributions to future sea-level change. Philos Trans R Soc A 364:1709–1731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gregory JM, Mitchell JFB (1997) The climate response to CO2 of the Hadley Centre coupled aogcm with and without flux adjustment. Geophys Res Lett 24:1943–1946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Griffies SM, Böning C, Bryan FO, Chassingnet EP, Gerdes R, Hasumi H, Hirst A, Treguier A-M, Webb D (2000) Developments in ocean climate modeling. Ocean Model 2:123–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hahn CJ, Warren SG (2007) A gridded climatology of clouds over land (1971–96) and ocean (1954–97) from surface observations worldwide, Tech. Rep. Documentation, 70pp, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC), Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, TennesseeGoogle Scholar
  39. Held IM, Soden BJ (2006) Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. J Clim 19:5686–5699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hewitt CD, Senior CS, Mitchell J (2001) The impact of dynamic sea-ice on the climate sensitivity of a GCM: a study of past, present, and future climates. Clim Dyn 17:655–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hibler WD (1979) A dynamic thermodynamic sea ice model. J Phys Oceanogr 9:815–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hibler WD (1980) Modeling a variable thickness ice cover. Mon Weather Rev 108:1943–1973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hibler WD (1984) The role of sea ice dynamics in modeling CO2 increases. In: Hansen JE, Takahashi T (eds) Climate processes and climate sensitivity. Geophysical monograph 29, vol 5. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pp 238–253Google Scholar
  44. Hirst AC, O’Farrell SP, Gordon HB (2000) Comparison of a coupled oceanatmosphere model with and without oceanic eddy-induced advection. Part I: Ocean spinup and control integrations. J Clim 13:139–163Google Scholar
  45. Holland DM, Mysak LA, Manak DK, Oberhuber JM (1993) Sensitivity study of a dynamic thermodynamic sea ice model. J Geophys Res 98:2561–2586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Holland MM, Bitz CM (2003) Polar amplification of climate change in the coupled model intercomparison project. Clim Dyn 21:221–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Holland MM, Bitz C, Weaver A (2001) The influence of sea ice physics on simulations of climate change. J Geophys Res 106:2441–2464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Holland MM, Bitz CM, Hunke EC, Lipscomb WH, Schramm JL (2006) Influence of the sea ice thickness distribution on polar climate in CCSM3. J Clim 19:2398–2414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Holloway G, Proshutinsky A (2007) Role of tides in Arctic ocean/ice climate. J Geophys Res 112:C04S06. doi:10.1029/2006JC003,643Google Scholar
  50. Hu Z-Z, Kuzmina SI, Bengtsson L, Holland DM (2004) Sea-ice change and its connection with climate change in the arctic in CMIP2 simulations. J Geophys Res 109:D10,106. doi:10.1029/2003JD004,454Google Scholar
  51. Hunke EC, Dukowicz JK (1997) An elastic-viscous-plastic model for sea ice dynamics. J Phys Oceanogr 27:1849–1867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hunke EC, Zhang Y (2000) Comparison of sea ice dynamics models at high resolution. Mon Weather Rev 127:396–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Huwald H, Tremblay L-B, Blatter H (2005) A multilayer sigma-coordinate thermodynamic sea ice model: Validation against Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean (SHEBA)/Sea Ice Model Intercomparison Project Part 2 (SIMIP2) data. J Geophys Res 110:C05,010. doi:10.1029/2004JC002,328Google Scholar
  54. Huybrechts P, Janssens I, Pocin C, Fichefet T (2002) The response of the greenland ice sheet to climate changes in the 21st century by interactive coupling of an aogcm with a thermomechanical ice-sheet model. Ann Glaciol 34:408–415Google Scholar
  55. IPCC (1992) Climate change 1992: the IPCC scientific assembly supplementary report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 198ppGoogle Scholar
  56. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007 the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 996ppGoogle Scholar
  57. Jochum M, Danabasoglu G, Holland MM, Kwon Y, Large W (2008) Ocean viscosity and climate. J Geophys Res 113:C06017. doi:10.1029/2007JC004,515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kreyscher M, Harder M, Lemke P, Flato GM (2000) Results of the sea ice model intercomparison project: evaluation of sea ice rheology schemes for use in climate simulations. J Geophys Res 105:11,299–11,320Google Scholar
  59. Laxon S, Peacock N, Smith D (2003) High interannual variability of sea ice thickness in the Arctic region. Nature 425:947–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lemke P, Owens W, Hibler W (1990) A coupled sea ice-mixed layer-pycnocline model for the weddell sea. J Geophys Res 95:9513–9525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lemke P, Hibler W, Flato G, Harder M, Kreyscher M (1997) On the improvement of sea ice ­models for climate simulations: the sea ice model intercomparison project. Ann Glaciol 25:183–187Google Scholar
  62. Lipscomb WH (2001) Remapping the thickness distribution in sea ice models. J Geophys Res 106:13,989–14,000Google Scholar
  63. Lipscomb WH, Hunke EC (2004) Modeling sea ice transport using incremental remapping. Mon Weather Rev 132:1341–1354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Manabe S, Stouffer RJ, Spellman MJ, Bryan K (1991) Transcient responses of a coupled ocean-atmosphere model to gradual changes of atmospheric CO2. Part I. Annual mean response. J Clim 4:785–818Google Scholar
  65. Marsland SJ, Haak H, Jungclaus JH, Latif M, Roeske F (2003) The max-planck-institute global ocean/sea ice model with orthogonal curvilinear coordinates. Ocean Model 5:91–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Martin G, Ringer M, Pope V, Jones A, Dearden C, Hinton T (2006) The physical properties of the atmosphere in the new Hadley Centre Global Environmental Model, HadGEM1. Part 1: Model description and global climatology. J Clim 19:147–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Maykut GA, Untersteiner N (1971) Some results from a time-dependent thermodynamic model of sea ice. J Geophys Res 76:1550–1575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. McFarlane NA, Boer GJ, Blanchet J-P, Lazare M (1992) The Canadian Climate Centre second-generation general circulation model and its equilibrium climate. J Clim 5:1013–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. McLaren AJ et al (2006) Evaluation of the sea ice simulation in a new coupled atmosphere-ocean climate model (HadGEM1). J Geophys Res 111:C12,014, doi:10.1029/2005JC003,033Google Scholar
  70. Meehl GA, Boer G, Covey C, Latif M, Stouffer R (2000) Coupled model intercomparison project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 81:313–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Meehl GA, Covey C, Delworth T, Latif M, McAvaney B, Mitchell JFB, Stouffer RJ, Taylor KE (2007) The WCRP CMIP3 multimodel dataset: A new era in climate change research. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. doi:10.1175/BAMS–88–9–1383Google Scholar
  72. Mikolajewicz U, Vizcaino M, Jungclaus J, Schurgers G (2007) Effect of ice sheet interactions in anthropogenic climate change simulations. Geophys Res Lett 34:L18706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Moritz RE, Bitz CM (2000) Climate model underestimates natural variability of Northern Hemisphere sea ice extent. Science 288:927aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Oberhuber JM (1993) Simulation of the Atlantic circulation with a coupled sea-ice-mixed layer-isopycnical general circulation model. Part I: model description. J Phys Oceanogr 23:808–829Google Scholar
  75. O’Farrell SP (1998) Investigation of the dynamic sea-ice component of a coupled atmosphere sea-ice general circulation model. J Geophys Res 103:15,751–15,782Google Scholar
  76. Oort AH (1974) Year-to-year variations in the energy balance of the arctic atmosphere. J Geophys Res 79:1253–1260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Overland JE, Turet P (1994) Variability of the atmospheric energy flux across 70 N computed from the GFDL data set. In: Johannessen OM, Muench RD, Overland JE (eds) Polar oceans and their role in shaping the global environment. Geophysics Monograph 85. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  78. Pedersen CA, Roeckner E, Lüthje M, Winther J-G (2009) A new sea ice albedo scheme including melt ponds for ECHAM5 general circulation model. J Geophys Res 114. doi:10.1029/2008JD010,440Google Scholar
  79. Pollard D, Thompson SL (1994) Sea-ice dynamics and co2 sensitivity in a global climate model. Atmos Ocean 32:449–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Proshutinsky A, Kowalik Z (2001) Preface to special section on Arctic Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (AOMIP) studies and results. J Geophys Res 112:C04S01. doi:10.1029/2006JC004,017Google Scholar
  81. Proshutinsky A et al (2001) The Arctic Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (AOMIP). EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 82(51):637–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Randall D et al (1998) Status of and outlook for large-scale modeling of atmosphere-ice-ocean interactions in the arctic. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 79:197–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Ridley JK, Huybrechts P, Gregory JM, Lowe JA (2005) Elimination of the greenland ice sheet in a high co2 climate. J Clim 18:3409–3427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Rind D, Healy R, Parkinson C, Martinson D (1995) The role of sea ice in 2XCO2 climate model sensitivity. 1. The total influence of sea ice thickness and extent. J Clim 8:449–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Rothrock DA, Yu Y, Maykut GA (1999) Thinning of the arctic sea ice cover. Geophys Res Lett 26:3469–3472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Salas-Mélia D (2002) A global coupled sea ice-ocean model. Ocean Model 4:137–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Schmidt GA, Bitz CM, Mikolajewicz U, Tremblay LB (2004) Ice-ocean boundary conditions for coupled models. Ocean Model 7:59–74. doi:10.1016/S1463–5003(03)00,030–1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sellers WD (1969) A global climate model based on the energy balance of the earth-atmosphere system. J Appl Meteorol 8:392–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Semtner AJ (1976) A model for the thermodynamic growth of sea ice in numerical investigaions of climate. J Phys Oceanogr 6:379–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Shupe MD, Intrieri JM (2004) Cloud radiative forcing of the arctic surface: the influence of cloud properties, surface albedo, and solar zenith angle. J Clim 17:616–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Slingo JM (1987) The development and verification of a cloud prediction scheme for the ECMWF model. Q J R Meteorol Soc 113:899–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Stroeve J, Holland MM, Meier W, Scambos T, Serreze M (2007) Arctic sea ice decline: faster than forecast. Geophys Res Lett 34. doi:10.1029/2007GL029,703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Sundqvist H, Berge E, Kristjánsson JE (1989) Condensation and cloud parameterization studies with a mesoscale numerical weather prediction model. Mon Weather Rev 117:1641–1657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Tao X, Walsh JE, Chapman WL (1996) An assessment of global climate model simulations of arctic air temperatures. J Clim 9:1060–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Taylor PD, Feltham DL (2003) A model of melt pond evolution on sea ice. J Geophys Res 109:C12,007. doi:10.1029/2004JC002,361Google Scholar
  96. Uppala S et al (2005) The ERA-40 re-analysis. Q J R Meteorol Soc 131:2961–3012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Vavrus SJ (1999) The response of the coupled Arctic sea ice-atmosphere system to orbital forcing and ice motion at 6 ka and 115 ka BP. J Clim 12:873–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Vavrus SJ, Harrison S (2003) The impact of sea-ice dynamics on the Arctic climate system. Clim Dyn 20:741–757Google Scholar
  99. Walsh J, Timlin M (2003) Northern Hemisphere sea ice simulations by global climate models. Polar Res 22:75–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Walsh JE, RG Crane (1992) A comparison of gcm simulations of Arctic climate. Geophys Res Lett 19:29–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Walsh JE, Kattsov VM, Chapman WL, Govorkova V, Pavlova T (2002) Comparison of arctic climate simultations by uncoupled and coupled global models. J Clim 15:1429–1446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Wang M, Overland JE, Kattsov V, Walsh JE, Zhang X, Pavlova T (2007) Intrinsic versus forced variation in coupled climate model simulations over the arctic during the twentieth century. J Clim 20:1093–1107. doi:10.1175/JCLI4043.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Washington WM, Meehl GA (1989) Climate sensitivity due to increased co2: Experiments with a coupled atmosphere and ocean general circulation model. Clim Dyn 8:211–223Google Scholar
  104. Wetherald R, Manabe S (1988) Cloud feedback processes in a general circulation model. J Atmos Sci 45:1397–1415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Winton M (2000) A reformulated three-layer sea ice model. J Atmos Ocean Technol 17:525–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Wolff J-O, Maier-Reimer E, legutke S (1997) The Hamburg ocean primitive equation model. Tech. Rep., No. 13, German Climate Computer Center (DKRZ), Hamburg, 98ppGoogle Scholar
  107. Wyser K et al (2007) An evaluation of arctic cloud and radiation processes during the SHEBA year: Simulation results from eight arctic regional climate models. Clim Dyn 22. doi:10.1007/s00,382–007–0286–1Google Scholar
  108. Yukimoto S, Noda A, Uchiyama T, Kusunoki S (2006) Climate change of the twentieth through twenty-first centuries simulated by the MRI-CGCM2.3. Pap Meteorol Geophys 56:9–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Zhang J, Rothrock D (2000) Modeling arctic sea ice with an efficient plastic solution. J Geophys Res 108:3325–3338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Zhang X, Walsh JE (2006) Toward a seasonally ice-covered Arctic Ocean: Scenarios from the IPCC AR4 model simulations. J Clim 19:1730–1747CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cecilia M. Bitz
    • 1
  • Jeff K. Ridley
    • 2
  • Marika Holland
    • 3
  • Howard Cattle
    • 4
  1. 1.Atmospheric SciencesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Hadley Centre for Climate PredictionMet OfficeExeterUK
  3. 3.National Center for Atmospheric ResearchBoulderUSA
  4. 4.National Oceanography CentreSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations