A Review of Systems and Projects: Management of Legislative Resources

Chapter
Part of the Law, Governance and Technology Series book series (LGTS, volume 4)

Abstract

This chapter provides a review of the most significant initiatives in legislative documents management at international level. Standards and tools are described and compared.

Keywords

Legal Document Electronic Publication Legal Text Document URIs Draft Bill 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    AIPA. 2001, November. Definizione delle regole per l’assegnazione dei nomi uniformi ai documenti giuridici. Circolare n. AIPA/CR/35. In Italian.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    AIPA. 2002, April. Formato per la Rappresentazione Elettronica dei Provvedimenti Normativi tramite il Linguaggio di Marcatura XML. Circolare n. AIPA/CR/40 (in Italian), http://www.cnipa.gov.it/site/_contentfiles/00127500/127544_CR_40_ 2002.pdf.
  3. 3.
    Arnold-Moore, T. 1997. Automatic generation of amendment legislation. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 56–62, Melbourne, Vicoria, Australia, ACM, 1997. ISBN 0-89791-924-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arnold-Moore, T., J. Clemes, and M. Tadd. 2002. Connected to the law: Tasmanian legislation using enact. Technical report, TeraText.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Biagioli, C. 1997. Towards a legal rules functional micro-ontology. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Legal Ontologies, LEGONT’97. University of Melbourne, Law School, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boer, A., R. Hoekstra, and R. Winkels. 2002. Metalex: Legislation in xml. In Proceedings of JURIX 2002: Legal Knowledge and Information System, 1–10.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boer, A., R. Winkels, R. Hoekstra, and T. van Engers. 2003. Knowledge management for legislative drafting in an international setting. In Proceedings of JURIX 2003: Legal Knowledge and Information System, 91–100, Faculty of Law & Institute of Information and Computing Sciences Utrecht University, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boer A., R. Hoekstra, E. de Maat, E. Hupkes, F. Vitali, M. Palmirani, and B. Rátai. 2009. CEN MetaLex Workshop Agreement.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Horei Data Teikyo System, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, M. and C. H. D. T. System. http://law.e-gov.go.jp/cgi-bin/idxsearch.cgi.
  10. 10.
    Khaled, O.A., H. Chabbi, and M. Ramalho. 2004, July. ÉTUDE URN. University of Applied Sciences of Western Switzerland, EIA-FR.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lupo, C., and C. Batini. 2003. A federative approach to laws access by citizens: The “NormeinRete” system. In Proceedings of second international conference electronic government (EGOV), ed. R. Traunmuller, 413–416. Springer.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maeda, M. 2003. Workbook Hosei Shitsumu. (revised ed.). Tokyo: Gyosei.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McClure, J. 2006. Legal-RDF vocabularies, requirements & design rationale. In Proceedings of the V Legislative XML Workshop, 149–159. European Press Academic Publishing, Florence.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Megale, F., and F. Vitali. 2001. I dtd dei documenti di norme in rete. Informatica e Diritto 1: 167–231.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moats, R., and K.R. Sollins. 1997. URN syntax. Technical Report RFC 2141, Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ogawa, Y., S. Inagaki, and K. Toyama. 2007. Automatic consolidation of Japanese statutes based on formalization of amendment sentences. In Proceedings of JSAI’07, 363–376. Miyazaki, JapanGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Spinosa, P. 2001. Identification of legal documents through urns (uniform resource names). In Proceedings of the EuroWeb 2001, The Web in Public Administration.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tucker, H. 2004a, July. Lex Dania - White Paper. A System of XML Schemas for Danish Legislative Documentation.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tucker, H. 2004b, July. LexDania - Documentation. Guidelines for Writing Omni- and DocType and Application Schemas.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tucker, H. 2004c, March. LexDania - Documentation. Introduction to Concepts and Status of XML Linking. Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tucker, H. 2004d, June. LexDania - Documentation. Metadata.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tucker, H. 2004e, May. LexDania - Documentation. XML and XSL Best Practices for Writing Schemas. Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tucker, H. 2004f, April. LexDania Documentation. Universal addresses. Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vitali, F., and F. Zeni. 2007. Towards a country-independent data format: The Akoma-Ntoso experience. In Proceedings of the V Legislative XML Workshop, 67–86. European Press Academic Publishing, Florence.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ITTIG-CNR, Institute for Legal Information Theory and Techniques, National Research Council of ItalyFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations