Marine Protected Areas

  • Mitsutaku Makino
Chapter
Part of the Fish & Fisheries Series book series (FIFI, volume 34)

Abstract

There are two types of marine-protected areas (MPAs) in Japan: Legal MPAs (LMPAs) and Autonomous MPAs (AMPAs). The former MPAs are established directly based on the prescriptions of legislative laws and set by the government. The latter MPAs are more site specific and responsive to the local socioecological conditions, and are established based on local initiatives. Fishers play a core role in their planning and implementation processes. Four cases of Autonomous MPAs presented in this chapter show the diversity of their objectives, participants, and implementation processes. After discussing the objectives of MPAs, the advantages and weak points of AMPAs are summarized. As other initiatives for ecosystem conservation by local fishing people in Japan, concepts of Sato-umi (the seas as part of one’s homeland or community) and Uo-tsuki-rin (fish conservation forests) are briefly described.

Keywords

Coral Reef Local Fisher Walleye Pollock Okinawa Prefecture Ecosystem Conservation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Charles A, Wilson L (2009) Human dimensions of marine protected areas. ICES J Mar Sci 66(1):6–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Citizen Group Meeting for the Promotion of Nature Restoration (2005) Nature restoration activities linking forests, sato (villages), rivers, and ocean: lessons from 13 advanced cases in Japan. Chuohoki Publishers, Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  3. Convention on Biological Diversity (2000) Decisions adopted by the conference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity at its fifth meeting, UNEP/CBD/COP/5/23Google Scholar
  4. Convention on Biological Diversity (2004) Decisions adopted by the conference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity at its fifth meeting, UNEP/CBD/COP/7/5Google Scholar
  5. Convention on Biological Diversity (2006) Decisions adopted by the conference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity at its fifth meeting, UNEP/CBD/COP/8/15Google Scholar
  6. Dudley N (2008) Guidelines for applying protected area management categories. IUCN. http://data.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/PAPS-016.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2010
  7. Fisheries Agency (2007a) Guideline for actions against rocky shore calcification. National Association of Fisheries Infrastructures, Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  8. Fisheries Agency (2007b) Guideline for sea grass bed restoration activities. Marino Forum 21, Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  9. Fisheries Research Agency (2009) The grand design of fisheries and resource management in Japan. http://www.fra.affrc.go.jp/pressrelease/pr20/210331/. Accessed 30 June 2010
  10. Forestry Agency (2010) Changes in the area of conservation forests. http://www.rinya.maff.go.jp/j/tisan/tisan/con_2_2_2.html. Accessed 30 June 2010
  11. Kakuma S (2007) Diversity and multi-functions of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) in Coral Reefs. Galaxea 8(2):91–108 (In Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kakuma S (2009) Multi-functionality of MPAs in coral reef area. In: Yamao M, Shima H (eds) Multi-functionality of fisheries communities and fisheries in Japan. Hokuto-syobo, Tokyo, pp 89–110 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  13. Makino M (2010) Marine protected areas and local communities in Japan. Environ Res Q 157:55–62 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  14. Makino M, Matsuda H (2011) Fisheries diversity and ecosystem-based co-management, In: O. Rosemary, I. Pery, P. Curry, K, Cochrane (Eds.) Coping with global changes in social-ecological systems. Willey-Blackwells, London, pp 322–333Google Scholar
  15. Makino M, Matsuda H, Sakurai Y (2009) Expanding fisheries co-management to ecosystem-based management. Mar Policy 33:207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McDonald A (2009) Concepts and practices of SATOYAMA SATO-UMI sub-global assessment in Japan. Presentation at East Asian Sea Congress, Manila, Nov 24Google Scholar
  17. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/index.aspx
  18. Tanaka T (2010) A review of the barren ground phenomenon and the recovery of seaweed communities in Kagoshima, southern Japan. Bull Kagoshima Prefect Fish Technol Dev Cent 1:13–18Google Scholar
  19. Umeno S, Tanesaka E (2001) A history of the fish gathering forest dominated with the warm temperate evergreen broad-leaved tree plants; a case study in Kuroyama and Satori-Hirami sections on Kii-Oshima Island. Japan. Bull Kinki Univ Fac Agric 34:165–172 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  20. World Summit on Sustainable Development (2002) Plan of implementation of the world summit on sustainable development. http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/WSSD_POI_PD/English/WSSD_PlanImpl.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2010
  21. Yagi N, Takagi AP, Takada Y, Kurokura H (2010) Marine protected areas in Japan: institutional background and management framework. Mar Policy 34:1300–1306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yanagi T (1998) Coastal sea as a “Sato-umi”. J Jpn Soc Water Environ 21(11):1 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  23. Yanagi T (2007) Sato-umi: a new concept for coastal sea management Ron. TERRAPUB, TokyoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mitsutaku Makino
    • 1
  1. 1.National Research Institute of Fisheries ScienceFisheries Research AgencyYokohamaJapan

Personalised recommendations