Recent Development on Bonded Structures

  • G. Delgrange
  • J. C. Ehrström
Conference paper

Abstract

Adhesive bonding is a technology that offers significant advantages for the construction of Aluminium aircraft structures. It is used industrially on several commercial aircraft.

This assembly technique combines the stiffness of junctions allowing higher compression loads with a multiple load path configuration with very efficient load transfer between the elements, leading to high damage tolerance. Used together with new Aluminium Copper Lithium alloys (AIRWARE TM technology), weight savings over 20% on typical wing components are obtained.

An overview of tests and modelling activities performed by Alcan internally and in partnership with public laboratories to demonstrate the quantitative impact of bonding on damage tolerance and compression stability is given. These include large stiffened panels tested in compression and fatigue crack growth, tests on laminates, and the support to the development of a debond prediction model at TUDelft.

An assessment of the technology is proposed from an industrial point of view. Manufacturing issues, in particular non-destructive quality assurance of adhesive bonds and out of autoclave bonding appear to be the main priorities to address in order to widen the use of this efficient technology that could represent a major advantage for future metallic aircraft to be developed around 2020.

Keywords

Fatigue Crack Growth Fatigue Crack Propagation Damage Tolerance Weight Saving Collapse Load 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Higgins, A.: Int. J. of Adhesion and Adhesives 20, 367 (2000)Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Vlot, A.: Glare, History of The Development of a New Aircraft Material. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2001)Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Furfari, D.: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Operational Practice. In: Bos, M. (ed.) Proceedings of the 24st ICAF Symposium, vol. I, pp. 1305–1319. Springer, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Ehrström, J.-C., Muzzolini, R., Arsène, S., Van der Veen, S.: In: Dalle, C. (ed.) Proceedings of the 23rd ICAF Symposium, vol. I, pp. 79–90. DGLR Publ., Hamburg (2005)Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Schijve, J., van Lipzig, H.T.M., van Gestel, G.F.J., Hoeymakers, A.H.W.: Fatigue properties of adhesive-bonded laminated sheet material of aluminium alloys. Eng. Frac. Mech. 12(4), 561 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Morkovkine, A.V., Petoukhov, Y.V.: Techno Metall. (4) (2003) ISBN 620.191.33Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Delgrange, G.: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Operational Practice. In: Bos, M. (ed.) Proceedings of the 24st ICAF Symposium, vol. I, pp. 1305–1319. Springer, Rotterdam (2009)Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Alderliesten, R.C.: Analytical prediction model for fatigue crack propagation and delamination growth in Glare. Internatioanl Journal of Fatigue 29(4), 628 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Krueger, R.: Virtual crack closure technique: History, approach and applications. Applied Mechanics Reviews 57(2), 109 (2004)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Meneghin, I., Pacchione, M., Vermeer, P.: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Operational Practice. In: Bos, M. (ed.) Proceedings of the 24st ICAF Symposium, vol. I, pp. 1305–1319. Springer, Rotterdam (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Delgrange
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. C. Ehrström
    • 1
  1. 1.Alcan Centre de Recherche de VoreppeVoreppeFrance
  2. 2.Delft University of technologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations