Does Tree Management Affect Biomass and Soil Carbon Stocks of Acacia mangium Willd. Stands in Kerala, India?

Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Advances in Agroforestry book series (ADAG, volume 8)

Abstract

Initial spacing and tree pruning are silvicultural strategies that influence tree growth and productivity, which determine the potential of tree stands to store C in the vegetation and soil. A field experiment was conducted at Thiruvazhamkunnu, Kerala, India in a 6.5 year-old Acacia mangium stand to evaluate the changes in vegetation and soil (0–15 cm) C pools as a function of four planting densities (625, 1,250, 2,500, and 5,000 stems ha−1), with and without 50% crown pruning. Both tree planting density and crown pruning significantly (p  <  0.01) influenced the C stocks of A. mangium trees. Total vegetation (aboveground  +  roots) C was highest for the 5,000 trees ha−1 (81.82 Mg ha−1) and lowest in the 625 trees ha−1 treatment (41.39 Mg ha−1). Soil C stocks also co-varied among the density regimes with the lowest values for treeless control plots. Overall, denser stands promote C storage, but very high stand densities (e.g., 5,000 stems ha−1) may adversely affect tree growth and productivity, reducing vegetation C pools. Likewise, intense pruning may depress the vegetation C pool and would release CO2 from the pruned biomass, especially if the slash are burnt or decomposed. Pruning effects are, however, dependent on stand density, implying the need for optimizing crown pruning regimes in conjunction with stand density levels. By extension, stand thinning exerts negative or positive feedbacks on biomass accretion depending on stand density, which may also influence the amount of C sequestered by the trees. Information reported in the literature confirms this. Irrigating the trees during water scarcity periods also may promote soil and vegetation C sequestration. But inorganic fertilization may have positive, negative, or neutral effects depending on site fertility, species, fertilizer doses, and the stage of stand development.

Keywords

Carbon pools Crown pruning Silvicultural practices Stand density 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Anderson JM, Ingram JSI (1989) Tropical soil biology and fertility: a handbook of methods. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 171 pGoogle Scholar
  2. Awang K, Taylor D (eds) (1993) Acacia mangium: growing and utilization. MPTS Monograph Series No. 3. Winrock International and FAO, Bangkok, 280 pGoogle Scholar
  3. Beadle C, Barry K, Hardiyanto E, Irianto R, Junarto Mohammed C, Rimbawanto A (2007) Effect of pruning Acacia mangium on growth, form and heart rot. For Ecol Manage 238:261–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dixon RK (1997) Silvicultural options to conserve and sequester carbon in forest systems: Preliminary economic assessment. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 27(Special):139–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. George SJ, Kumar BM (1998) Litter dynamics and cumulative soil fertility changes in silvopastoral systems of a humid tropical region in central Kerala. Int Tree Crops J 9:267–282Google Scholar
  6. Giardina CP, Ryan MG, Binkley D, Fownes JH (2003) Primary production and carbon allocation in relation to nutrient supply in a tropical experimental forest. Glob Change Biol 9:1438–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gupta N, Kukal SS, Bawa SS, Dhaliwal GS (2009) Soil organic carbon and aggregation under poplar based agroforestry system in relation to tree age and soil type. Agroforest Syst 76:27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gyenge JE, Fernańdez ME, Schlichter TM (2010) Effect of stand density and pruning on growth of ponderosa pines in NW Patagonia, Argentina. Agroforest Syst 78:233–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heriansyah I, Miyakuni K, Kato T, Kiyono Y, Kanazawa Y (2007) Growth characteristics and biomass accumulations of Acacia mangium under different management practices in Indonesia. J Trop For Sci 19(4):226–235Google Scholar
  10. Hunter I (2001) Above ground biomass and nutrient uptake of three tree species (Eucalyptus camaldulensis, Eucalyptus grandis and Dalbergia sissoo) as affected by irrigation and fertilizer, at 3 years of age, in southern India. For Ecol Manage 144:189–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Isaac ME, Gordon AM, Thevathasan N, Oppong SK, Quashie-Sam J (2005) Temporal changes in soil carbon and nitrogen in West African multistrata agroforestry systems: a chronosequence of pools and fluxes. Agroforest Syst 65:23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jackson ML (1958) Soil chemical analysis. Asia Publishing House, New Delhi, 498 pGoogle Scholar
  13. Jandl R, Lindner M, Vesterdal L, Bauwens B, Baritze R, Hagedorn F, Johnsong DW, Minkkinen K, Byrne KA (2007) How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration? Geoderma 137(3–4):253–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jobidon R (1993) Nitrate fertilisation stimulates emergence of red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) under forest canopy. Fert Res 36:91–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. KAU (2002) Package of practices recommendations: crops, 12th edn. Directorate of Extension, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, 278 pGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaul M, Mohren GMJ, Dadhwal VK (2010) Carbon storage and sequestration potential of selected tree species in India. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 15:489–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim C (2008) Soil carbon storage, litterfall and CO2 efflux in fertilized and unfertilized larch (Larix leptolepis) plantations. Ecol Res 23:757–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kumar BM, Deepu JK (1992) Litter production and decomposition dynamics in moist deciduous forest of the Western Ghats in Peninsular India. For Ecol Manage 50:181–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kunhamu TK, Kumar BM, Vishwanath S (2005) Tree allometry, volume and aboveground biomass yield in a seven year-old Acacia mangium Willd. stand at Thirvazhamkunnu, India. In: Tewari VP, Srivastava RL (eds) Multipurpose trees in the Tropics: Management and Improvement Strategies. Proceedings of the international symposium. Multipurpose trees in the tropics: assessment, growth and management. Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur, pp 415–421Google Scholar
  20. Kunhamu TK, Kumar BM, Viswanath S (2009) Does thinning affect litterfall, litter decomposition, and associated nutrient release in Acacia mangium stands of Kerala in peninsular India? Can J For Res 39:792–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kunhamu TK, Kumar BM, Viswanath S, Sureshkumar P (2010) Root activity of young Acacia mangium Willd trees: influence of stand density and pruning as studied by 32P soil injection technique. Agroforest Syst 78:27–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Luxmoore RJ, Tharp ML, Post WM (2008) Simulated biomass and soil carbon of loblolly pine and cottonwood plantations across a thermal gradient in southeastern United States. For Ecol Manage 254(2):291–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Majid NM, Paudyal BK (1992) Pruning trial for Acacia mangium Wild. plantation in Peninsular Malaysia. For Ecol Manage 47:285–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Malhi Y, Roberts JT, Betts RA, Killeen TJ, Li W, Nobre CA (2008) Climate change, deforestation, and the fate of the Amazon. Science 319:169–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Markewitz D (2006) Fossil fuel carbon emissions from silviculture: Impacts on net carbon sequestration in forests. For Ecol Manage 236:153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nair PKR, Kumar BM, Nair VD (2009a) Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 172:10–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nair PKR, Nair VD, Kumar BM, Haile SG (2009b) Soil carbon sequestration in tropical agroforestry systems: a feasibility appraisal. Environ Sci Policy 12(8):1099–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nair PKR, Nair VD, Kumar BM, Showalter JM (2010) Carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems. Adv Agron 108:237–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Paquette AJ, Hawryshyn A, Senikas V, Potvin C (2009) Enrichment planting in secondary forests: a promising clean development mechanism to increase terrestrial carbon sinks. Ecol Soc 14(1):31Google Scholar
  30. Saha SK, Nair PKR, Nair VD, Kumar BM (2010) Carbon storage in relation to soil size-fractions under tropical tree-based land use systems. Plant Soil 328:433–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Samek JH, Skole DL, Klinhom U, Butthep C, Navanugraha C, Uttaruk P, Laosuwan T, Dumrongsukit S, Sangkanukij P, Kulwong T (2011) Inpang community network agroforestry carbon bank in northeast Thailand. In: Kumar BM, Nair PKR (eds) Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems: opportunities and challenges. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 263–280Google Scholar
  32. Shanavas A, Kumar BM (2006) Physical and mechanical properties of three agroforestry tree species from Kerala, India. J Trop Agric 44:23–30Google Scholar
  33. Shujauddin N, Kumar BM (2003) Ailanthus triphysa at different densities and fertilizer regimes in Kerala, India: growth, yield, nutrient use efficiency and nutrient export through harvest. For Ecol Manage 180:135–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stape JL, Binkley D, Ryan MG (2008) Production and carbon allocation in a clonal Eucalyptus plantation with water and nutrient manipulations. For Ecol Manage 255(3–4):920–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Silviculture and Agroforestry, College of ForestryKerala Agricultural University, KAU P.O.ThrissurIndia

Personalised recommendations