Advertisement

Immigrant Settlement and the Life Course: An Exchange of Research Perspectives and Outlook for the Future

  • Helga de ValkEmail author
  • Michael Windzio
  • Matthias Wingens
  • Can Aybek
Chapter

Abstract

Patterns of immigrant settlement as well as the process of incorporation of children of immigrants are directly affecting the life courses of immigrants, their families as well as the majority population in the host country. From this perspective a linkage between the sociology of the life course and research on migration and integration of immigrants seems obvious. In the general introduction we started with an overview of the theoretical foundations and basic analytical concepts of the life course approach and pointed to potentially fruitful links with migration and integration research. The 11 contributions in this book empirically demonstrated the analytical potential of linking the life course perspective and research on immigrant settlement. In our conclusion the use and payoff of this connection will be discussed in more detail. Now, while the link between the life course approach and migration and integration research seems to be obvious, existing studies on family dynamics and the life course often focus on majority populations only and hardly take those with a migrant origin into account. Little is known on the background and consequences of life course transitions for migrants and their families. Our book is an attempt to overcome this limitation of previous work and to show the relevance of applying a life course approach to the study of immigrant groups. Bridging the gap between research traditions is urgently needed as Europe’s current population is already heterogeneous and expected to be even more diverse in the future. In many countries already a fifth of the population is born abroad, or has at least one parent born outside the country of residence. International migrants often experience a rapid social change when moving from their country of origin to another country of settlement. Depending on the move they may not be familiar with the culture in the country of settlement, its institutional regimes, and everyday life practices. This may bring along many uncertainties as was already very well described by Thomas and Znaniecki in their classic work “The Polish Peasant in Europe and America” (1918–1920). As they also show the migration move can have a disruptive effect on the individual migrant and the family.

Keywords

Host Country International Migrant Individual Life Host Society Generation Immigrant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alba, R. D., & Nee, V. (1997). Rethinking assimilation theory for a New Era of immigration. International Migration Review, 31(4), 826–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alba, R. D., & Nee, V. (2003). Remaking the American mainstream. Assimilation and contemporary immigration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bernhardt, E., et al. (2007). Immigration, gender, and family transitions to adulthood in Sweden. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  4. Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology, 46(1), 5–34.Google Scholar
  5. Berry, J. W. (2003). Conceptual approaches to acculturation. In K. M. Chun, P. B. Organista, & G. Marín (Eds.), Acculturation: Advances in theory, measurement and applied research (pp. 17–37). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolzman, C., et al. (2004). Older labour migrants’ well-being in Europe: The case of Switzerland. Ageing and Society, 24(3), 411–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Breton, R. (1964). Institutional completeness of ethnic communities and the personal relations of immigrants. The American Journal of Sociology, 70(2), 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burr, J. A., & Mutchler, J. E. (1999). Race and ethnic variation in norms of filial responsibility among older persons. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(3), 674–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Valk, H. A. G. (2006). Pathways into adulthood. A comparative study on family life transitions among migrant and Dutch youth. Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht/ICS dissertation series: Thela thesis.Google Scholar
  10. De Valk, H. A. G. (2010). Families of migrant origin: A life course perspective. ERC starting grant project description of work. The Hague: NIDI.Google Scholar
  11. Di Prete, T. A., & Eirich, G. M. (2006). Cumulative advantage as a mechanism for inequality. A review of theoretical and empirical developments. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 271–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elder, G. (1985). Perspectives on the life course. In G. Elder (Ed.), Life course dynamics: Transitions and trajectories, 1968–1980 (pp. 23–49). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Esser, H. (2004). Does the “New” immigration require a “New” theory of intergenerational integration. International Migration Review, 38(3), 1126–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Esser, H. (2008). Assimilation, ethnische Schichtung oder selektive Akkulturation? Neuere Theorien der Eingliederung von Migranten und das Modell der intergenerationalen Integration. In F. Kalter (Ed.), Migration und Integration (pp. 81–107). Wiesbaden: VS Verl. für Sozialwiss. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie Sonderheft, 48.Google Scholar
  15. Gordon, M. (1964). Assimilation in American life. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kagitcibasi, C. (1996). Family and human development across cultures: A view from the other side. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Kagitcibasi, C. (2005). Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context. Implications for self and family. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 403–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kley, S. (2009). Migration im Lebensverlauf. Der Einfluss von Lebensbedingungen und Lebenslaufereignissen auf den Wohnortwechsel (1st ed.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  19. Massey, D. S., & Espinosa, K. E. (1997). What’s driving Mexico-U.S. migration? A theoretical, empirical, and policy analysis. The American Journal of Sociology, 102(4), 939–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mayer, K. U. (2004). Whose lives? How history, societies and institution define and shape life courses. Research in Human Development, 1(30), 161–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Milewski, N. (2008). Fertility of immigrants and their descendants in West Germany – An event history approach. Rostock: University of Rostock, Doctoral thesis.Google Scholar
  22. Mulder, C. H. (1993). Migration dynamics: A life course approach. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Mulder, C. H., & Hooimeijer, P. (1999). Residential relocations in the life course. In L. J. G. Van Wissen & P. A. Dykstra (Eds.), Population issues: An interdisciplinary focus (pp. 159–186). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.Google Scholar
  24. Nauck, B. (2002). Families in Turkey. In R. Nave-Herz (Ed.), Family change and intergenerational relations in different cultures (pp. 11–48). Würzburg: Ergon Verlag.Google Scholar
  25. Nauck, B. (2007). Familiensystem und Kultur. In G. Trommsdorff & H.-J. Kornadt (Eds.), Theorien und Methoden der kulturvergleichenden Psychologie (pp. 407–486). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  26. Park, R. E. (1950). Race and culture. Glencoe: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  27. Portes, A., & Zhou, M. (1993). The new second generation: Segmented assimilation and its variants. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 530, 74–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reher, D. S. (1998). Family ties in Western Europe: Persistent contrasts. Population and Development Review, 24(2), 203–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Todd, E. (1985). The explanation of ideology. Family structures and social systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  30. Van Tubergen, F. (2005). The integration of immigrants in cross-national perspective. origin, destination, and community effects. Utrecht: Utrecht University, ICS dissertation series no. 112.Google Scholar
  31. Van Tubergen, F. (2006). Occupational status of immigrants in cross-national perspective: A multilevel analysis of 17 Western Societies. In G. Parsons & T. Smeeding (Eds.), Immigration and the transformation of Europe (pp. 147–171). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wagner, M. (1989). Räumliche Mobilität im Lebensverlauf. Eine empirische Untersuchung sozialer Bedingungen der Migration. Stuttgart: Enke.Google Scholar
  33. Zhou, M. (1997). Segmented assimilation: Issues, controversies, and recent research on the new second generation. International Migration Review, 31(4), 975–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helga de Valk
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michael Windzio
    • 2
  • Matthias Wingens
    • 3
  • Can Aybek
    • 4
  1. 1.Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute the Hague and Interface DemographyVrije Universiteit BrusselThe HagueThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Institute for Empirical and Applied Sociology (EMPAS)University of BremenBremenGermany
  3. 3.Bremen International Graduate School of Social Sciences (BIGSSS)University of BremenBremenGermany
  4. 4.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of SiegenSiegenGermany

Personalised recommendations