What Is Interpretation of the Law for the French Judge?

Chapter
Part of the Law and Philosophy Library book series (LAPS, volume 95)

Abstract

There are in France two different and to some extent contradictory conceptions of the role of judges in interpretation. According to the first, which goes back to the Enlightenment, the function of judges is limited to a strict application of the law, i.e. statutory law. Because of a widespread belief that interpreting the law would be equivalent to rewriting them, interpretation was strictly forbidden. However, since judicial interpretation is obviously unavoidable, it had to be practiced in disguise through a complex mechanism that allowed judges to interpret without acknowledging it and thus exercise a huge, but hidden, power. In the 20th century, a second conception, which gradually gained considerable importance, recognized that judges interpret and indeed have law creating function that allows them to exercise some degree of political power. The second conception has not replaced the first. Although they are very different and contradictory in many ways, they coexist and even have the same effect: judges are not prevented from creating law, and their power is even reinforced by being concealed.

Keywords

Civil Code Judicial Review French Revolution International Rule Supreme Court 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Beccaria, C. 1764. Of Crimes and Punishments., translation, annotations, and introduction by G. R. Newman and P. Marongiu. 5th ed. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 2009.Google Scholar
  2. Eisenmann, Ch. 1933. L’Esprit des Lois et la séparation des pouvoirs, ds. Mélanges Carré de Malberg, p. 190, reprinted in Eisenmann, Ch. 2002. Essais de théorie du droit, de droit constitutionnel et d’idées politiques. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar
  3. Halpérin, J.-L. 1987. Le tribunal de cassation et les pouvoirs sous la Révolution (1790–1799). Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar
  4. Hanley, S. 1983. The ‘Lit de Justice’ of the Kings of France: Constitutional Ideology in Legend, Ritual, and Discourse. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Montesquieu charles-Louis de Secondat. 1748. Spirit of the Laws, edited by Anne M. Cohler, Basia Carolyn Miller, and Harold Samuel Stone. Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  6. Troper, M., and C. Grzegorczyk. 1997. “Precedent in France”, In Interpreting Precedents. A Comparative Study, edited by N. ds. Maccormick and R. S. Summers, 103 ff. Aldershot: Dartmouth. Google Scholar
  7. Troper, M. 2008. “Constitutional Law”, In Introduction to French Law, edited by G. ds. Berman and E. Picard, 1–34. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
  8. Troper, M. new edit. 2010. La séparation des pouvoirs et l’histoire constitutionnelle française. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre de Théorie et Analyse du Droit, Université de Paris Ouest – NanterreParisFrance

Personalised recommendations