Abstract

This chapter allows the designer to obtain insight into the basic operation principles of the different inductive converter topologies. It also provides a comparison of a selection of these topologies. Thus, allowing the determination of the fundamental and intrinsic advantages and drawbacks of the different converter topologies, with the aim towards monolithic integration. These advantages and drawbacks may well differ from converter topologies that are not intended for monolithic integration, as the on-chip area requirement and available devices are much more restricted. The primary classes of non-galvanically separated step-down, step-up and step-up/down inductive converter topologies are discussed. These topologies are categorized according to their non-inverting voltage conversion range in the respective Sects. 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3. The converters of each of the three categories are compared in terms of their circuit topology, their basic operation and their area requirement. The derived classes of DC-DC converter topologies, such as galvanically separated converters and resonant converters, are addressed in Sect. 3.4. Topology variations on the primary classes of converter topologies, incorporating multi-phase converters and Single-Inductor Multiple Output (SIMO) converters, are discussed in Sect. 3.5. Finally, the chapter is concluded in Sect. 3.6.

Keywords

Power Conversion Efficiency Boost Converter Buck Converter Spice Simulation Switching Loss 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. [Abe07]
    S. Abedinpour, B. Bakkaloglu, S. Kiaei, A Multistage Interleaved Synchronous Buck Converter with Integrated Output Filter in 0.18 μm SiGe Process. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 22(6), 2164–2175 (2007). doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2007.909288 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [Bio06]
    T. Biondi, A. Scuderi, E. Ragonese, G. Palmisano, Analysis and Modeling of Layout Scaling in Silicon Integrated Stacked Transformers. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 54(5), 2203–2210 (2006). doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2006.872788 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [Del09]
    O. Deleage, J.C. Crebier, M. Brunet, Y. Lembeye, H.T. Manh, Design and Realization of Highly Integrated Isolated DC/DC Micro-Converter, in IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, vol. 1, 2009, pp. 3690–3697 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [Eir08]
    G. Eirea, S.R. Sanders, Phase Current Unbalance Estimation in Multiphase Buck Converters. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 23(1), 137–143 (2008). doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2007.911840 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [Eri04]
    R.W. Erickson, D. Maksimović, Fundamentals of Power Electronics, 2nd edn. (Kluwer Academic, New York, 2004). First edition: 2001 Google Scholar
  6. [Gue10]
    R. Guevremont, FAIMS: High-Field Asymmetric Waveform Ion Mobility Spectrometry (2010), http://www.faims.com/index.htm. Separation of ions at atmospheric pressure and room temperature
  7. [Kwo09]
    D. Kwon, G.A. Rinćon-Mora, Single-Inductor-Multiple-Output Switching DC-DC Converters. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II 59(8), 614–618 (2009) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [Lee00]
    P.W. Lee, Y.S. Lee, D.K.W. Cheng, X.C. Liu, Steady-State Analysis of an Interleaved Boost Converter with Coupled Inductors. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 47(4), 787–795 (2000). doi: 10.1109/41.857959 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [Ma03]
    D. Ma, W.H. Ki, C.Y. Tsui, P.K.T. Mok, Single-Inductor Multiple-Output Switching Converters with Time-Multiplexing Control in Discontinuous Conduction Mode. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 38(1), 89–100 (2003) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [Mak91]
    D. Maksimovic, S. Cuk, Switching Converters with Wide DC Conversion Range. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 6(1), 151–157 (1991) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [Mas77]
    R.P. Massey, E.C. Snyder, High-Voltage Single-Ended DC-DC Converter, in IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 1977, pp. 156–159 Google Scholar
  12. [Mey92]
    T.A. Meynard, H. Foch, Multi-Level Conversion: High Voltage Choppers and Voltage-Source Inverters, in IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, vol. 1, 1992, pp. 397–403 Google Scholar
  13. [Nam09]
    A. Nami, A.A. Boora, F. Zare, A. Gosh, F. Blaabjerg, A Novel Configuration for Voltage Sharing in DC-DC Converters, in International Conference on Renewable Energies and Power Quality, 2009 Google Scholar
  14. [Sav03]
    A. Savio, A. Richelli, L. Colalongo, Z.M. Kowacs-Vajna, A Fully-Integrated Self-Tuned Transformer Based Step-Up Converter, in IEEE Proceedings of the International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, vol. 1, 2003, pp. 357–360 Google Scholar
  15. [Sev79]
    R. Severns, A New Current-Fed Converter Topology, in IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 1979, pp. 277–283 Google Scholar
  16. [Vil08]
    G. Villar, E. Alacron, Monolithic Integration of a 3-Level DCM-Operated Low-Floating-Capacitor Buck Converter for DC-DC Step-Down Conversion in Standard CMOS, in IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 2008, pp. 4229–4235 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [Wen09b]
    M. Wens, M. Steyaert, An 800 mW Fully-Integrated 130 nm CMOS DC-DC Step-Down Multi-Phase Converter, with On-Chip Spiral Inductors and Capacitors, in IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, vol. 1, 2009, pp. 3706–3709 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [Wib08]
    J. Wibben, R. Harjani, A High-Efficiency DC-DC Converter Using 2 nH Integrated Inductors. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 43(4), 844–854 (2008) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ESAT-MICAS, Dept. ElektrotechniekK.U. LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.ESAT-MICAS, Dept. ElektrotechniekK.U. LeuvenHeverleeBelgium

Personalised recommendations