Social Media

  • Barney Warf
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Geography book series (BRIEFSGEOGRAPHY, volume 1)

Abstract

Today, more people are better connected to one another, and the world, than at any other time in human history. For vast segments of the world’s population, mobile phones, the internet and email, instant messaging, and various forms of digital social media have become deeply woven into the fabric of daily life.

References

  1. Abrams, J., & Hall, P. (2006). Else/where: Mapping—New cartographies of networks and territories. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, P. (1995). A reconsideration of personal boundaries in space-time. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 85, 267–285.Google Scholar
  3. Adams, P. (1996). Protest and the scale politics of telecommunications. Political Geography, 15, 419–441.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, J. (2000). Power/economic knowledge: Symbolic and spatial formations. In J. Bryson, P. Daniels, N. Henry, & J. Pollard (Eds.), Knowledge, space, economy (pp. 15–33). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Alvarez, L. (2012). Spring break gets tamer with world watching online. New York Times, March 16, 1.Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  7. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  8. Armstrong, J., & Moulitsas, M. (2006). Crashing the gate: Netroots, grassroots, and the rise of people-powered politics. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Ayres, J. (1999). From the streets to the internet: The cyber-diffusion of contention. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 566, 132–143.Google Scholar
  10. Bandy, J., & Smith, T. (Eds.). (2005). Coalitions across borders: Transnational protests and the neoliberal order. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  11. Bennett, W. (2003). Communicating local activism: Strengths and vulnerabilities of networked politics. Information, Communication and Society, 6(2), 143–168.Google Scholar
  12. Blood, R. (2001). Activism and the internet: From e-mail to new political movement. Journal of Communication Management, 5(2), 160–169.Google Scholar
  13. Bolin, G., & Westlund, O. (2009). Mobile generations: The role of mobile technology in the shaping of Swedish media generations. International Journal of Communication, 3, 108–124.Google Scholar
  14. Bosco, F. (2007). Emotions that build networks: Geographies of human rights movements in Argentina and beyond. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 98(5), 545–563.Google Scholar
  15. Bowers, C., & Stoller, M. (2005). Emergence of the progressive blogosphere: A new force in American politics. http://newpolitics.net/sites/ndn-newpol.civicactions.net/files/The-Emergence-of-the-Progressive-Blogosphere.pdf
  16. Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: From production to produsage. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  17. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Cammaerts, B. (2005). ICT-usage among transnational social movements in the networked society—to organise, to mobilise, and to debate. In R. Silverstone (Ed.), Media, technology, and everyday life in Europe: From information to communication (pp. 53–72). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  19. Campbell, S., & Park, Y. (2008). Social implications of mobile telephony: The rise of personal communication society. Sociology Compass, 2(2), 371–387.Google Scholar
  20. Carr, N. (2010). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  21. Carty, V. (2001). The internet and grassroots politics: Nike, the athletic apparel industry, and the anti-sweatshop campaign. Tamara: Journal of Critical Postmodern Organization Science, 1(2), 34–48.Google Scholar
  22. Castells, M. (1996). The information age, volume I: The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. Castells, M. (1997). The information age, volume II: The power of identity. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  24. Castells, M. (2001). The internet galaxy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Chadwick, A. (2006). Internet politics: States, citizens, and new communication technologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Clark, J., & Themundo, N. (2003). The age of protest: Internet-based ‘dot causes’ and the anti-globalization movement. In J. Clark (Ed.), Globalizing civic engagement: Civil society and transnational action (pp. 109–126). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  27. Cleaver, H. (1998). The Zapatista effect: The internet and the rise of an alternative political fabric. Journal of International Affairs, 51(2), 621–640.Google Scholar
  28. Comer, J., & Wikle, T. (2008). Worldwide diffusion of the cellular phone, 1995–2005. Professional Geographer, 60(2), 252–269.Google Scholar
  29. Corbridge, S. (1998). Development ethics: Distance, difference, plausibility. Ethics, Place and Environment, 1, 35–53.Google Scholar
  30. Cosgrove, D. (2008). Geography and vision. London: I.B. Taurus.Google Scholar
  31. Cox, K. (1998). Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: Looking for local politics. Political Geography, 17(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
  32. Cunningham, S. (2001). Popular media as public ‘spericules’ for diasporic communities. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 4, 131–147.Google Scholar
  33. Curry, M. (1997). The digital individual and the private realm. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 87, 681–699.Google Scholar
  34. Dahan, M., & Shefer, G. (2001). Ethnic groups and distance shrinking communications technologies. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 7, 85–107.Google Scholar
  35. Debatin, B., Lovejoy, J., Horn, A., & Hughes, B. (2009). Facebook and online privacy: Attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(1), 83–108.Google Scholar
  36. Deibert, R. (1997). Parchment, printing, and hypermedia. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Deibert, R. (2000). International plug ‘n play? Citizen activism the internet, and global public policy. International Studies Perspectives, 1(3), 255–272.Google Scholar
  38. Deibert, R., & Rohozinski, R. (2008). Good for liberty, bad for security? Global civil society and the securitization of the internet. In R. Deibert, J. Palfrey, R. Rohozinksi, & J. Zittrain (Eds.), Access denied: The practice and policy of global internet filtering (pp. 123–150). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  39. Dekimper, M., Parker, P., & Sarvary, M. (1998). Staged estimation of international diffusion models: An application to global cellular telephone adoption. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 57, 105–132.Google Scholar
  40. Della Porta, D., Andretta, M., Mosca, L., & Reiter, H. (2006). Globalization from below: Transnational activists and protest networks. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  41. Denning, D. (2002). Activism, hacktivism, and cyberterrorism: The internet as a tool for influencing foreign policy. In J. Arquilla & D. Ronfeldt (Eds.), Networks and netwars: The future of terror, crime, and militancy (pp. 239–288). Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
  42. Ding, L., Haynes, K., & Li, H. (2010). Modeling the spatial diffusion of mobile telephones in China. Professional Geographer, 62(2), 248–263.Google Scholar
  43. Dobson, J., & Fisher, P. (2007). The panopticon’s changing geography. Geographical Review, 97(3), 307–323.Google Scholar
  44. Dodge, M., & Kitchin, R. (2005). Code and the transduction of space. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95, 162–180.Google Scholar
  45. Dong, Y., & Li, M. (2004). Mobile communications in China. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 2(4), 395–404.Google Scholar
  46. Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168.Google Scholar
  47. Escobar, A. (1999). Gender, place and networks: A political ecology of cyberculture. In W. Harcourt (Ed.), Women@internet: Creating new cultures in cyberspace (pp. 31–54). London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  48. Ettlinger, N. (2003). Cultural economic geography and a relational and microspace approach to trusts, rationalities, networks and change in collaborative workplaces. Journal of Economic Geography, 3, 145–171.Google Scholar
  49. Farman, J. (2011). Mobile interface theory: Embodied space and locative media. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Featherstone, D. (2003). Spatialities of transnational resistance to globalization: The maps of grievance of the Inter-Continental Caravan. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 28, 404–421.Google Scholar
  51. Featherstone, D. (2005). Towards the relational construction of militant particularisms: Or why the geographies of past struggles matter. Antipode, 37, 250–271.Google Scholar
  52. Fischer, C. (1992). America calling: A social history of the telephone to 1940. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  53. Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  54. Fortunati, L. (2002). The mobile phone: Towards new categories and social relations. Information, Communication, and Society, 5(4), 513–528.Google Scholar
  55. Froehling, O. (1997). The cyberspace ‘war of ink and Internet’ in Chiapas, Mexico. Geographical Review, 87, 291–307.Google Scholar
  56. Fuller, D., & Askins, K. (2010). Public geographies II: Being organic. Progress in Human Geography, 34(5), 654–667.Google Scholar
  57. Gergen, K. (1991). The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  58. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Ginzburg, C. (1994). Killing a Chinese Mandarin: The moral implications of distance. New Left Review, 208, 107–119.Google Scholar
  60. Goffman, I. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  61. Goggin, C. (2006). Cell phone culture: Mobile technology in everyday life. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. Gopal, S. (2007). The evolving social geography of blogs. In H. Miller (Ed.), Societies and cities in the age of instant access (pp. 275–293). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  63. Gordon, E. and de Souza e Silva, A. (2011). Net locality: Why location matters in a networked world. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  64. Graham, M., & Khosravi, S. (2002). Reordering public and private in Iranian cyberspace: Identity, politics and mobilization. Identities, 9, 319–346.Google Scholar
  65. Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (1996). Telecommunications and the city: Electronic spaces, urban places. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  66. Grannovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.Google Scholar
  67. Haarstad, H., & Fløysand, A. (2007). Globalization and the power of rescaled narratives: A case of opposition to mining in Tambogrande, Peru. Political Geography, 26(3), 280–308.Google Scholar
  68. Hampton, K., Goulet, L., Rainie, L., & Purcell, K. (2011). Social networking sites and our lives: How people’s trust, personal relationships, and civic and political involvement are connected to their use of social networking sites and other technologies. Washington: Pew Research Center’s Internet and American Life Project.Google Scholar
  69. Hampton, K., & Wellman, B. (2001). Long distance community in the network society: Contact and support beyond netville. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 476–495.Google Scholar
  70. Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  71. Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, nature, and the geography of difference. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  72. Hawken, P. (2007). Blessed unrest: How the largest social movement in history is restoring grace, justice, and beauty to the world. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  73. Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social networks and internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication, and Society, 8(2), 125–147.Google Scholar
  74. Herzog, H., Dinoff, B., & Page, J. (1997). Animal rights talk: Moral debate over the internet. Qualitative Sociology, 20, 399–418.Google Scholar
  75. Hill, K. (2011). Will Facebook destroy your job search? Forbes Magazine (July 18). http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2011/0718/features-facebook-social-media-google-destroy-job-search.html
  76. Hill, K., & Hughes, J. (1998). Cyberpolitics: Citizen activism in the age of the internet. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  77. Huschle, B. (2002). Cyber-disobedience: When is hacktivism civil disobedience? International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 16(1), 69–83.Google Scholar
  78. Illia, L. (2003). Passage to cyberactivism: How dynamics of activism change. Journal of Public Affairs, 3(4), 326–337.Google Scholar
  79. International Telecommunications Union. (2010). The world in 2010. http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/material/FactsFigures2010.pdf
  80. Jackson, M. (2008). Distracted: The erosion of attention and the coming dark age. Amherst: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  81. Jameson, F. (1984). Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism. New Left Review, 146, 53–92.Google Scholar
  82. Johnston, J., & Laxer, G. (2003). Solidarity in the age of globalization: Lessons from the anti-MAI and Zapatista struggles. Theory and Society, 32(1), 39–91.Google Scholar
  83. Jones, M. (2009). Phase space: Geography, relational thinking, and beyond. Progress in Human Geography, 33(4), 487–506.Google Scholar
  84. Jones, B., Spigel, B., & Malecki, E. (2010). Blog links as pipelines to buzz elsewhere: The case of New York theater blogs. Environment and Planning B, 37, 99–111.Google Scholar
  85. Jordan, T., & Taylor, P. (2004). Hacktivism and cyberwars: Rebels with a cause? London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  86. Juris, J. (2005). The new digital media and activist networking within anti-corporate globalization movements. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 597, 189–208.Google Scholar
  87. Kahn, R., & Kellner, D. (2004). New media and internet activism: From the “Battle of Seattle” to blogging. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  88. Katz, J., & Aakhus, M. (Eds.). (2002). Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Kellerman, A. (2002). The internet on Earth: A geography of information. Hoboken: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  90. Kirkpatrick, D. (2010). The Facebook effect: The inside story of the company that is connecting the world. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  91. Knudsen, J. (1998). Rebellion in Chiapas: Insurrection by Internet and public relations. Media, Culture and Society, 20, 507–518.Google Scholar
  92. Lal, V. (1999). The politics of history on the internet: Cyber-diasporic Hinduism and the North American Hindu diaspora. Diaspora, 8, 137–172.Google Scholar
  93. Langman, L. (2005). From virtual public spheres to global justice: A critical theory of internetworked social movements. Sociological Theory, 23(1), 42–74.Google Scholar
  94. Lanier, J. (2010). You are not a gadget: A manifesto. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  95. Lawson, V. (2007). Geographies of care and responsibility. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
  96. Lenhart, A., Ling, R., Campbell, S., & Purcell, K. (2010). Teens and mobile phones. Washington: Pew Internet and American Life Project. http://pewinternet.org/~/media/Files/Reports/2010/PIP-Teens-and-Mobile-2010-with-topline.pdf
  97. Li, F., Papagiannidis, S., & Bourlakis, M. (2010). Living in ‘multiple spaces’: Extending our socioeconomic environment through virtual worlds. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(3), 425–446.Google Scholar
  98. Lin, J., Halavais, A., & Zhang, B. (2007). The blog network in America: blogs as indicators of relationships among US cities. Connections, 27(2), 15–23. http://www.insna.org/PDF/Connections/v27/20061-2-3.pdf Google Scholar
  99. Ling, R. (2004). The mobile connection: The cell phone’s impact on society. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  100. Ling, R. (2010). New tech, new ties: How mobile communication is reshaping social cohesion. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  101. Ling, R., & Campbell, S. (2009). The reconstruction of space and time through mobile communication practices. In R. Ling & S. Campbell (Eds.), The reconstruction of space and time: Mobile communication practices (pp. 1–16). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  102. Ling, R., & Donner, J. (2009). Mobile phones and mobile communication. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  103. Lipshutz, R. (1992). Reconstructing world politics: The emergence of global civil society. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 21, 398–420.Google Scholar
  104. Livingstone, S., & Brake, D. (2010). On the rapid rise of social networking sites: New findings and policy implications. Children and Society, 24(1), 75–83.Google Scholar
  105. Longan, M. (2002). Building a global sense of place: The community networking movement in the United States. Urban Geography, 23(3), 213–236.Google Scholar
  106. Mäenpäa, P. (2001). Mobile communication as a way of urban life. In J. Gronow & A. Ward (Eds.), Ordinary consumption (pp. 107–124). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  107. Marche, S. (2012). Is Facebook making us lonely? The Atlantic (May). http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/05/is-facebook-making-us-lonely/8930/
  108. Marston, S. (2000). The social construction of scale. Progress in Human Geography, 24, 219–242.Google Scholar
  109. Marston, S., Jones, J., & Woodward, K. (2005). Human geography without scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30, 416–432.Google Scholar
  110. Maskell, P., & Malmberg, A. (1999). The competitiveness of firms and regions: Ubiquitification and the importance of localized learning. European Urban and Regional Studies, 6(1), 9–25.Google Scholar
  111. Massey, D. (2005). For space. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  112. Massey, D. (2009). Responsibilities over distance. In . J. Kenway and J. Fahey (Eds.) Globalizing the research imagination, (73–85). New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  113. Mercer, C. (2004). Engineering civil society: ICT in Tanzania. Review of African Political Economy, 99, 49–64.Google Scholar
  114. Merithew, C. 2004. Women of the (cyber) world: The case of Mexican feminist NGOs Journal of Interdisciplinary Gender Studies, 8(1–2), 87–102.Google Scholar
  115. Mojab, S. (2001). The politics of cyberfeminism in the Middle East: The case of Kurdish women. Race, Gender and Class, 8(4), 42–61.Google Scholar
  116. Moore, A. (2008). Rethinking scale as a geographical category: From analysis to practice. Progress in Human Geography, 32, 203–225.Google Scholar
  117. Morozov, E. (2011). The net delusion: The dark side of internet freedom. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  118. Murdoch, J. (2006). Post-structuralist geography: A guide to relational space. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  119. Nie, N. (2001). Sociability, interpersonal relations, and the internet: Reconciling conflicting findings. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 420–435.Google Scholar
  120. O’Lear, S. (1996). Using electronic mail (e-mail) surveys for geographic research: Lessons from a survey of Russian environmentalists. Professional Geographer, 48, 209–217.Google Scholar
  121. Paasi, A. (2004). Place and region: Looking through the prism of scale. Progress in Human Geography, 28, 536–546.Google Scholar
  122. Pain, R., Grundy, S., Gill, S., Towner, E., Sparks, G., & Hughes, K. (2005). ‘So long as I take my mobile’: Mobile phones, urban life and geographies of young people’s safety. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29, 814–830.Google Scholar
  123. Palczewski, C. (2001). Cyber-movements, new social movements, and counter-publics. In R. Asen & D. Brouwer (Eds.), Counterpublics and the state (pp. 161–184). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  124. Papacharissi, Z. (2009). The virtual geographies of social networks: A comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and A Small World. New Media and Society, 11(1–2), 199–220.Google Scholar
  125. Parham, A. (2004). Diaspora, community and communications: Internet use in transnational Haiti. Global Networks, 4, 199–217.Google Scholar
  126. Pickerill, J. (2003). Cyberprotest: Environmental activism online. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  127. Pile, S. (2008). Where is the subject? Geographical imaginations and spatializing subjectivity. Subjectivity, 23, 206–218.Google Scholar
  128. Pinkerton, A., Young, S., & Dodds, K. (2011). Weapons of mass communication: The securitization of social networking sites. Political Geography, 30(3), 115–117.Google Scholar
  129. Porta, D., & Mosca, L. (2005). Global-net for global movements? A network of networks for a movement of movements. Journal of Public Policy, 25(1), 165–190.Google Scholar
  130. Postman, N. (1985). Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  131. Ritzer, G., & Jurgenson, N. (2010). Production, consumption, prosumption: The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital ‘prosumer’. Journal of Consumer Culture, 10(1), 13–26.Google Scholar
  132. Routledge, P. (2003). Convergence space: Process geographies of grassroots globalization networks. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 28, 333–349.Google Scholar
  133. Routledge, P. (2008). Acting in the network: ANT and the politics of generating associations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(2), 199–217.Google Scholar
  134. Rutherford, K. (2000). Internet activism: NGOs and the mine ban treaty. International Journal of Grey Literature, 1(3), 99–106.Google Scholar
  135. Smith, J. (2001). Globalizing resistance: The battle of Seattle and the future of social movements. Mobilization, 6, 1–19.Google Scholar
  136. Sooryamoorthy, R., Miller, B., & Shrum, W. (2011). Untangling the technology cluster: Mobile telephony, internet use and the location of social ties. New Media and Society, 13, 391–410.Google Scholar
  137. Storper, M., & Venables, A. (2004). Buzz: Face-to-face contact and the urban economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 4, 351–370.Google Scholar
  138. Stutzman, F. (2006). An evaluation of identity-sharing behavior in social network communities. Journal of the International Digital Media and Arts Association, 3(1), 10–18.Google Scholar
  139. Swan, D., & McCarthy, J. (2003). Contesting animal rights on the internet: Discourse analysis of the social construction of argument. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22, 297–320.Google Scholar
  140. Taylor, M., Kent, M., & White, W. (2001). How activist organizations are using the internet to build relationships. Public Relations Review, 27, 263–284.Google Scholar
  141. Thrift, N., & French, S. (2002). The automatic production of space. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 27, 309–335.Google Scholar
  142. Tong, S., Van Der Heide, B., Langwell, L., & Walther, J. (2008). Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(3), 531–549.Google Scholar
  143. Townsend, A. (2000). Life in the real-time city: Mobile telephones and urban metabolism. Journal of Urban Technology, 7(2), 85–104.Google Scholar
  144. Travers, A. (2003). Parallel subaltern feminist counterpublics in cyberspace. Sociological Perspectives, 46(2), 223–237.Google Scholar
  145. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  146. Ungoed, T., & Sheehan, M. (1999). Riot organisers prepare to launch cyber war on city. Sunday Times (August 15), 1.Google Scholar
  147. Van Aelst, P., & Walgrave, S. (2002). New media, new movements? The role of the internet in shaping the ‘anti-globalization’ movement. Information, Communication and Society, 5(4), 465–493.Google Scholar
  148. Van de Donk, W., Loader, B., & Nixon, P. (Eds.). (2004). Cyberprotest: New media, citizens and social movements. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  149. Van Zoonen, L. (2001). Feminist internet studies. Feminist Media Studies, 1(1), 67–72.Google Scholar
  150. Vasalou, A., Joinson, A., & Courvoisier, D. (2010). Cultural differences, experience with social networks and the nature of “true commitment” in Facebook. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(10), 719–728.Google Scholar
  151. Warf, B. (1994). Structuration theory and electronic communications. In D. Wilson & J. Huff (Eds.), Marginalized places and populations: A structurationist agenda. Greenwood: Westport, CT.Google Scholar
  152. Warf, B. (2009). Diverse spatialities of the Latin American and Caribbean internet. Journal of Latin American Geography, 8(2), 125–146.Google Scholar
  153. Wasley, A. (2007). Only connect. Index on Censorship, 36(4), 52–58.Google Scholar
  154. Waters, J. (2011). Could you pass a Facebook background check? Wall Street Journal (July 25). http://articles.marketwatch.com/2011-07-25/finance/30745971_1_employers-pictures-and-comments-party-pictures
  155. Webber, M. (1973). Urbanization and communications. In G. Gerbner, L. Gross, & W. Melody (Eds.), Communications technology and social policy (pp. 293–304). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  156. Wellman, B. (2001a). Computer networks as social networks. Science, 243, 2031–2034.Google Scholar
  157. Wellman, B. (2001b). Physical place and cyberplace: The rise of personalized networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(2), 227–252.Google Scholar
  158. Whatmore, S. (1997). Dissecting the autonomous self: Hybrid cartographics for a relational ethics. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 15, 37–53.Google Scholar
  159. Wise, P. (1997). Always already virtual: Feminist politics in cyberspace. In D. Holmes (Ed.), Virtual politics: Identity and community in cyberspace (pp. 179–196). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  160. Youngs, G. (2002). Feminizing cyberspace: Rethinking techno agency. In J. Parpart, S. Rai, & K. Staudt (Eds.), Rethinking empowerment: Gender and development in a global/local world (pp. 79–94). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  161. Zook, M., & Graham, M. (2007). The creative reconstruction of the Internet: Google and the privatization of cyberspace and digiplace. Geoforum, 38(6), 1322–1343.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barney Warf
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations