Advertisement

Comparison of Dry and Flood Turning in Terms of Dimensional Accuracy and Surface Finish of Turned Parts

  • Noor Hakim Rafai
  • Mohammad Nazrul Islam
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 90)

Abstract

This work presents experimental and analytical results of a comparison of dry and flood turning in terms of dimensional accuracy and surface finish of turned parts. Subsequently, the influence of independent input parameters on dimensional accuracy and surface finish characteristics is investigated in order to optimize their effects. Three techniques—traditional analysis, Pareto ANOVA, and the Taguchi method—are employed. Hardened alloy steel AISI 4340 has been selected as work material. The results show that for certain combinations of cutting parameters, dry turning produced better dimensional accuracy compared to that produced by flood turning. Therefore, in the future, it will be possible to develop a system through modelling the cooling process that will be capable of predicting the situations where dry turning will be beneficial. This will reduce the application frequency of cutting fluids by avoiding their unnecessary applications and, consequently, their negative impact on the environment.

Keywords

Dry turning Flood turning Dimensional accuracy Surface finish Pareto ANOVA Taguchi methods 

References

  1. 1.
    Marksberry PW, Jawahir IS (2008) A comprehensive tool-wear/tool-life model in the evaluation of NDM (near dry machining) for sustainable manufacturing. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48:878–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dhar NR, Kamruzzaman M, Ahmed M (2006) Effect of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) on too wear and surface roughness in turning AISI-4340 steel. J Mater Process Technol 172:299–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sarma DK, Dixit US (2007) A comparison of dry and air-cooled turning of grey cast iron with mixed oxide ceramic tool. J Mater Process Technol 190:160–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Varadaarajan AS, Philip PK, Ramamoorthy B (2002) Investigations on hard turning with minimal cutting fluid application (HTMF) and its comparison with dry and wet turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42:193–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harrma VS, Dogra M, Suri NM (2009) Cooling techniques for improved productivity in turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49:435–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dhar NR, Islam M, Islam S, Mithun MAH (2006) The influence of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) on cutting temperature, chip and dimensional accuracy in turning AISI-1040 steel. J Mater Process Technol 171:93–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rafai NH, Islam MN (2010) Comparison of dry and flood turning in terms of quality of turned parts, In: Lecture notes in engineering and computer science: proceedings of the world congress on engineering 2010, WCE 2010, 30 June–2 July, 2010, London, UK, pp 2044–2049Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ASME Y14.5-2009 (2009) Dimensioning and tolerancing, ASME, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ross PJ (1988) Taguchi techniques for quality engineering. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Park SH (1996) Robust design and analysis for quality engineering. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Manufacturing and Industrial EngineeringUniversiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM)Parit Raja, Batu PahatMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringCurtin University  PerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations