Mathematical Modelling for Coal Fired Supercritical Power Plants and Model Parameter Identification Using Genetic Algorithms

  • Omar Mohamed
  • Jihong Wang
  • Shen Guo
  • Jianlin Wei
  • Bushra Al-Duri
  • Junfu Lv
  • Qirui Gao
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 90)

Abstract

The paper presents the progress of our study of the whole process mathematical model for a supercritical coal-fired power plant. The modelling procedure is rooted from thermodynamic and engineering principles with reference to the previously published literatures. Model unknown parameters are identified using Genetic Algorithms (GAs) with 600MW supercritical power plant on-site measurement data. The identified parameters are verified with different sets of measured plant data. Although some assumptions are made in the modelling process to simplify the model structure at a certain level, the supercritical coal-fired power plant model reported in the paper can represent the main features of the real plant once-through unit operation and the simulation results show that the main variation trends of the process have good agreement with the measured dynamic responses from the power plants.

Keywords

Coal-fired power generation Genetic algorithms Mathematical modeling Supercritical boiler 

Nomenclature

ff

Fitness function for genetic algorithms

ffr

Pulverized fuel flow rate (kg/s)

h

Enthalpy per unit mass (MJ/kg)

K

Constant parameter

k

Mass flow rate gain

m

Mass (kg)

\( \dot{m} \)

Mass flow rate (kg/s)

P

Pressure of a heat exchanger (MPa)

\( \dot{Q} \)

Heat transfer rate (MJ/s)

R

Response

T

Temperature (°C)

t

Time (s)

?

Time constant (s)

U

Internal energy (MJ)

V

Volume of fluid (m3)

\( \dot{W} \)

Work rate or power (MW)

x

Generator reactance (p.u)

y

Output vector

?

Density (kg/m3)

?

Valve opening

?

Rotor angle (rad)

?

Mechanical angle (rad)

?

Speed (p.u)

?

Torque (p.u)

Subscripts

a

Accelerating

air

Air

e

Electrical

d

Direct axis

ec

Economizer

hp

High pressure turbine

hx

Heat exchanger

i

Inlet

ip

Intermediate pressure turbine

me

Mechanical

ms

Main steam

m

Measured

o

Outlet

out

Output of the turbine

q

Quadrature axis

rh

Reheater

sh

Superheater

si

Simulated

ww

Waterwall

Abbreviations

BMCR

Boiler maximum continuous rate

ECON

Economizer

GA

Genetic algorithm

HP

High pressure

HX

Heat exchanger

IP

Intermediate pressure

MS

Main steam

RH

Reheater

SC

Supercritical

SH

Superheater

WW

Waterwall

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to give our thanks to E.ON Engineering for their support and engineering advices. The authors also want to thank EPSRC (RG/G062889/1) and ERD/AWM Birmingham Science City Energy Efficiency and Demand Reduction project for the research funding support.

References

  1. 1.
    Kundur P (1981) A survey of utility experiences with power plant response during partial load rejection and system disturbances. IEEE Trans Power Apparatus Syst PAS-100(5):2471–2475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Laubli F, Fenton FH (1971) The flexibility of the supercritical boiler as a partner in power system design and operation: part I. IEEE Trans Power Apparatus Syst PAS-90(4):1719–1724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Laubli F, Fenton FH (1971) The flexibility of the supercritical boiler as a partner in power system design and operation: part II. IEEE Trans Power Apparatus Syst PAS-90(4):1725–1733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Littman B, Chen TS (1966) Simulation of bull-run supercritical generation unit. IEEE Trans Power Apparatus Syst 85:711–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Suzuki Y, Sik P, Uchida Y (1979) Simulation of once-through supercritical boiler. Simulation 33:181–193CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shinohara W, Kotischek DE (1995) A simplified model based supercritical power plant controller. In: Proceeding of the 35th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, vol 4, pp 4486–4491Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Inoue T, Taniguchi H, Ikeguchi Y (2000) A Model of Fossil Fueled Plant with Once-through Boiler for Power System Frequency Simulation Studies. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15(4):1322–1328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee KY, Hoe JS, Hoffman JA, Sung HK, Won HJ (2007) Neural network based modeling of large scale power plant. IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting No (24–28):1–8Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mohamed O, Wang J, Guo S, Al-Duri B, Wei J (2010) Modelling study of supercritical power plant and parameter identification using genetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering II, pp 973–978Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Adams J, Clark DR, Luis JR, Spanbaur JP (1965) Mathematical modelling of once-through boiler dynamics. IEEE Trans Power Apparatus Syst 84(4):146–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Salisbury JK (1950) Steam turbines & their cycles. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yu Y-N (1983) Electric power system dynamics. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ghaffari A, Chaibakhsh A (2007) A simulated model for a once through boiler by parameter adjustment based on genetic algorithms. Simul Model Pract Theory 15:1029–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Omar Mohamed
    • 1
  • Jihong Wang
    • 1
  • Shen Guo
    • 1
  • Jianlin Wei
    • 1
  • Bushra Al-Duri
    • 2
  • Junfu Lv
    • 3
  • Qirui Gao
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Electrical, Electronics, and Computer EngineeringUniversity of BirminghamEdgbaston, BirminghamUK
  2. 2.School of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of BirminghamEdgbaston, BirminghamUK
  3. 3.Department of Thermal EngineeringTsinghua UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations