The United Kingdom: Academic Retreat or Professional Renewal?
In this chapter, we report a range of findings from the UK CAP survey that are relevant to the governance and management of HEIs and seek to interpret them within the context of UK higher education, the drivers that are influencing institutions and the changes occurring within the academic profession itself. We find that academics’ views on the governance and management of their institutions are differentiated by institution type in particular, but also by age, length of time in the profession, and gender. These distinctions bring into question the dominant discourse of change in the academy as one of loss, alienation, and retreat. Our analysis suggests that a more nuanced and differentiated approach is required if institutions and academics themselves are to achieve and sustain professional renewal. In particular, institutions seeking to differentiate themselves in the market will need to develop forms of governance and management that suit their particular mission and circumstances, rather than comply with government diktats.
KeywordsHigh Education Institution Institutional Type Academic Profession Personal Influence Senior Management Team
- Bryson, C. (2000). Whither academic workers? From leisure class to organisational pawns. Paper prepared for the sixteenth Egos Colloquium, Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration, 2–4 July.Google Scholar
- CUC (2004) Questionnaire on governance issues: Final report, February, London: Committee of University Chairs. Retrieved from http://www2.bcu.ac.uk/docs/cuc/Pubs/GovernanceQuest-Finalreport-feb04.doc. Accessed July 18, 2010.
- Deem, R., & Brehony, K. (2005). Management as ideology: The case of “new managerialism” in higher education. Oxford Review of Education, 31(2), 213–231.Google Scholar
- Deem, R., & Johnson, R.J. (2003). Risking the university? Learning to be a manager-academic in UK universities. Sociological Research Online, 8(3). Retrieved July 18, 2010 from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/8/3/contents.html
- Ferlie, E., Ashbourne, L., Fitzgerald, L., & Pettigrew, A. (1996). The new public management in action. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Fulton, O. (1996a). Mass access and the end of diversity? The academic profession in England on the eve of structural reform. In P. Altbach (Ed.), The international academic profession: Portraits from fourteen countries. Princeton: Carnegie Foundation.Google Scholar
- Fulton, O. (1996b). Which academic profession are you in? In R. Cuthbert (Ed.), Working in higher education (pp. 157–169). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Fulton, O., et al. (2002). Higher education governance in the UK: Change and continuity. In A. Amaral (Ed.), Governing higher education: Comparing national perspectives (pp. 205–229). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Halsey, A. H. (1992). Decline of donnish dominion: The British academic professions in the twentieth century. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
- Henkel, M. (2000). Academic identities and policy change in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
- HESA. (2008). Resources of higher education institutions 2006/07. Cheltenham: Higher Education Statistics Agency.Google Scholar
- King, R. (2004). The university in the global age. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
- Lambert, R. (2003). Lambert review of business-university collaboration. London: HM Treasury.Google Scholar
- Locke, W. (2004). Integrating research and teaching strategies: Implications for institutional management and leadership in the United Kingdom. Higher Education Management and Policy, 16(4), 101–120.Google Scholar
- Locke, W. (2008). The academic profession in England: Still stratified after all these years? In RIHE (Ed.), The changing academic profession in international comparative and quantitative perspectives (pp. 89–115). RIHE International Seminar Report 12. Hiroshima: Research Institute for Higher Education, Hiroshima University. ISBN 4-902808-45-5, 978-4-902808-45-2.Google Scholar
- Locke, W. (2011). The institutionalization of rankings: Managing status anxiety in an increasingly marketized environment. In J. C. Shin, R. K. Toutkoushian, & U. Teichler (Eds.), Ranking, reputation and the quality of higher education. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Locke, W., & Bennion, A. (2009). Teaching and research in English higher education: New divisions of labour and changing perspectives on core academic roles. In RIHE (Ed.), The changing academic profession over 1992–2007: International comparative and quantitative perspectives (pp. 231–252). RIHE international seminar report 13. Hiroshima: Research Institute for Higher Education, Hiroshima University.Google Scholar
- Macfarlane, B. (2006). The academic citizen. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Marginson, S. (2000). Rethinking academic work in the global era. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 22(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
- McNay, I. (2008). The crisis in higher education: The views of academic professionals on policy, leadership values and operational practices. Higher Education Review, 40(2), 3–25.Google Scholar
- Moodie, G., & Eustace, R. (1974). Power and authority in British universities. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
- Newman, M. (2009). Persecution (is) complex. Times higher education, 21 May, 32–37, http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=406565§ioncode=26.
- Schofield, A. (2009). What is an effective and high performing governing body in UK higher education. London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education and the Committee of University Chairs.Google Scholar
- Tapper, T., & Salter, B. (1992). Oxford, Cambridge and the changing idea of the university: The challenge to donnish dominion. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.Google Scholar