Risk Communication at the Hungarian Guar-Gum Scandal

  • Gyula Kasza
  • Judith Szigeti
  • Szilárd Podruzsik
  • Krisztián Keszthelyi
Chapter

Abstract

Millions of people have no access to healthy and safe food due to food insecurity that may occur at household, regional or national levels. National policies, insufficient agricultural development and low levels of education may lead to food insecurity. Furthermore, food quality and food safety is a major benchmark of economic development. Food borne risks to human health can arise from biological, chemical or physical hazards. Risk analysis is a key discipline for reducing food borne diseases and food insecurity, and for strengthening food safety systems. Food safety risk analysis is used for assessing and managing risks associated with food hazards. The risk analysis process contains three elements: risk assessment, risk management and risk communication. This paper focuses on risk communication and summarizes the results and findings of the case study for official food safety communicators. The preliminary descriptive study intends to present the reaction of Hungarian consumers to a crisis that affected a wide range of society. In 2007, the guar gum scandal caused panic among consumers when dioxin-contaminated guar gum entered the food chain. This food contamination scare followed previous occasions such as production of intoxicated paprika powder, re-labelling of overdue meat packages and the Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) crisis in Hungary. To analyze risk perception and consumer behavior, a primary research was conducted with a sample size of 1,577.

Keywords

Consumer behaviour Food quality Guar gum Risk communication Risk perception 

References

  1. FAO (2005) The state of food insecurity in the world 2005, RomeGoogle Scholar
  2. Hajdu I, Lakner Z (1999) Az élelmiszeripar gazdaságtana. Mezőgazdasági Szaktudás Kiadó, BudapestGoogle Scholar
  3. Henson S (2003) The economics of food safety in developing countries. ESA Working Paper 2003/ 03–19Google Scholar
  4. Lammerding AM (1997) An overview of microbial food safety risk assessment. J Food Prot 60(11):1420–1425Google Scholar
  5. Powell D, Leiss W (1997) Mad cows and mother’s milk, the peril of poor risk communication. McGill-Queen’s University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Unklesbay N (1992) World food and you. Food Products Press, BinghamtonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V.  2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gyula Kasza
    • 1
  • Judith Szigeti
    • 2
  • Szilárd Podruzsik
    • 2
  • Krisztián Keszthelyi
    • 2
  1. 1.Hungarian Ministry of Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentBudapestHungary
  2. 2.Corvinus University of BudapestBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations