KEGG and GenomeNet Resources for Predicting Protein Function from Omics Data Including KEGG PLANT Resource

  • Toshiaki Tokimatsu
  • Masaaki Kotera
  • Susumu Goto
  • Minoru Kanehisa
Chapter

Abstract

With the rise of experimental technologies for omics research in recent years, considerable quantitative data related to transcription, protein and metabolism are available for predicting protein functions. To predict protein functions from large omics data, reference knowledge databases and bioinformatics tools play considerable roles. KEGG (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/) database we have been establishing is an integrated database of biological systems including genomic, chemical and systemic functional information. Our group has also been developing the tools for genome or chemical analysis as GenomeNet Bioinformatics Tools (http://www.genome.jp/en/gn_tools.html). In this chapter, we introduce the KEGG database resources and the GenomeNet Bioinformatics Tools for predicting protein functions from the viewpoint of omics research, as well as some recent topics (KEGG PLANT Resource and PathPred). KEGG PLANT Resource is one of the contents in the KEGG EDRUG database, and contains links for plant secondary metabolite biosynthesis pathways, plant genomes and EST sequences, chemical information of plant natural products and the prediction tool for plant secondary metabolism pathway. PathPred is a recently developed pathway prediction tool based on the chemical structure transformation patterns of enzyme reactions found in metabolic pathways.

References

  1. 1.
    Kanehisa, M., Goto, S., Furumichi, M., et al. KEGG for representation and analysis of molecular networks involving diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res. 38: D355–D360 (2010).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dixon, R.A., Strack, D. Phytochemistry meets genome analysis, and beyond. Phytochemistry 62: 815–816 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Donson, J., Fang, Y., Espiritu-Santo, G., et al. Comprehensive gene expression analysis by transcript profiling. Plant Mol. Biol. 48: 75–97 (2002).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aharoni, A., Vorst, O. DNA microarrays for functional plant genomics. Plant Mol. Biol. 48: 99–118 (2002).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sumner, L.W., Mendes, P., Dixon, R.A. Plant metabolomics: large-scale phytochemistry in the functional genomics era. Phytochemistry 62: 817–836 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sato, S., Soga, T., Nishioka, T., et al. Simultaneous determination of the main metabolites in rice leaves using capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry and capillary electrophoresis diode array detection. Plant J 40: 151–163 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Masoudi-Nejad, A., Goto, S., Jauregui, R., et al. EGENES: transcriptome-based plant database of genes with metabolic pathway information and expressed sequence tag indices in KEGG. Plant Physiol. 144: 857–866 (2007).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot. J. Linnean Soc. 141: 399–436 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moriya, Y., Shigemizu, D., Hattori, M., et al. PathPred: an enzyme-catalyzed metabolic pathway prediction server. Nucleic Acid Res. 38: W138–W143 (2010).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hattori, M., Okuno, Y., Goto, S., et al. Development of a chemical structure comparison method for integrated analysis of chemical and genomic information in the metabolic pathways. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125: 11853–11865 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hattori, M., Tanaka, N., Kanehisa, M., et al. SIMCOMP/SUBCOMP: chemical structure search servers for network analyses. Nucleic Acid Res. 38: W652–W656 (2010).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kotera, M., Okuno, Y., Hattori, M., et al. Computational assignment of the EC numbers for genomic-scale analysis of enzymatic reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126: 16487–16498 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Oh, M., Yamada, T., Hattori, M., et al. Systematic analysis of enzyme-catalyzed reaction patterns and prediction of microbial biodegradation pathways. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 47: 1702–1712 (2007).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Okuyama, E., Hasegawa, T., Matsushita, T., et al. Analgestic Components of Saposhinikovia Root (Saposhinikovia divaricata). Chem. Pharm. Bull. 49: 154–160 (2001).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Barrett, A.J., Cantor, C.R., Liebecq, C., et al. Enzyme nomenclature. San Diego, CA: Academic (1992).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tipton, K.F., Boyce, S. History of the enzyme nomenclature system. Bioinformatics 16: 34–40 (2000).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yamanishi, Y., Hattori, M., Kotera, M., et al. E-zyme: prediction potential EC numbers from the chemical transformation pattern of substrate-product pairs. Bioinformatics 25: i79–i86 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moriya, Y., Itoh, M., Okuda, S., et al. KAAS: an automatic genome annotation and pathway reconstruction server. Nucleic Acid Res. 35: W182–W185 (2007).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Toshiaki Tokimatsu
    • 1
  • Masaaki Kotera
    • 2
  • Susumu Goto
    • 2
  • Minoru Kanehisa
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Bioinformatics Center, Institute for Chemical ResearchKyoto UniversityUjiJapan
  2. 2.Bioinformatics Center, Institute for Chemical ResearchKyoto UniversityUjiJapan
  3. 3.Human Genome Center, Institute of Medical ScienceUniversity of TokyoMinato-ku, TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations