Membrane Fusions During Mammalian Fertilization

Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 713)

Abstract

Successful completion of fertilization in mammals requires three different types of membrane fusion events. Firstly, the sperm cell will need to secrete its acrosome contents (acrosome exocytosis; also known as the acrosome reaction); this allows the sperm to penetrate the extracellular matrix of the oocyte (zona pellucida) and to reach the oocyte plasma membrane, the site of fertilization. Next the sperm cell will bind and fuse with the oocyte plasma membrane (also known as the oolemma), which is a different type of fusion in which two different cells fuse together. Finally, the fertilized oocyte needs to prevent polyspermic fertilization, or fertilization by more than one sperm. To this end, the oocyte secretes the contents of cortical granules by exocytotic fusions of these vesicles with the oocyte plasma membrane over the entire oocyte cell surface (also known as the cortical reaction or cortical granule exocytosis). The secreted cortical contents modify the zona pellucida, converting it to a state that is unreceptive to sperm, constituting a block to polyspermy. In addition, there is a block at the level of the oolemma (also known as the membrane block to polyspermy).

Keywords

Zona Pellucida Acrosome Reaction Cortical Granule Perivitelline Space Sperm Surface 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Wassarman PM, Litscher ES (2008) Mammalian fertilization is dependent on multiple membrane fusion events. Methods Mol Biol 475:99–113PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Florman HM, Jungnickel MK, Sutton KA (2008) Regulating the acrosome reaction. Int J Dev Biol 52:503–510PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chiu PC, Wong BS, Chung MK et al (2008) Effects of native human zona pellucida glycoproteins 3 and 4 on acrosome reaction and zona pellucida binding of human spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 79:869–877PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buffone MG, Rodriguez-Miranda E, Storey BT et al (2009) Acrosomal exocytosis of mouse sperm progresses in a consistent direction in response to zona pellucida. J Cell Physiol 220:611–620PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gupta SK, Bansal P, Ganguly A et al (2009) Human zona pellucida glycoproteins: functional relevance during fertilization. J Reprod Immunol 83:50–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ganguly A, Bukovsky A, Sharma RK et al (2010) In humans, zona pellucida glycoprotein-1 binds to spermatozoa and induces acrosomal exocytosis. Hum Reprod 25:1643–1656PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gadella BM (2010) Interaction of sperm with the zona pellucida. Soc Reprod Fertil 67:267–287Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zanetti N, Mayorga LS (2009) Acrosomal swelling and membrane docking are required for hybrid vesicle formation during the human sperm acrosome reaction. Biol Reprod 81:396–405PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tsai PS, Garcia-Gil N, van Haeften T et al (2010) How pig sperm prepares to fertilize: stable acrosome docking to the plasma membrane. PLoS One 18:e11204Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim KS, Gerton GL (2003) Differential release of soluble and matrix components: evidence for intermediate states of secretion during spontaneous acrosomal exocytosis in mouse sperm. Dev Biol 264:141–152PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim E, Yamashita M, Kimura M et al (2008) Sperm penetration through cumulus mass and zona pellucida. Int J Dev Biol 52:677–682PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Buffone MG, Foster JA, Gerton GL (2008) The role of the acrosomal matrix in fertilization. Int J Dev Biol 52:511–522PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Suarez SS (2008) Regulation of sperm storage and movement in the mammalian oviduct. Int J Dev Biol 52:455–462PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Primakoff P, Myles DG (2007) Cell-cell membrane fusion during mammalian fertilization. FEBS Lett 581:2174–2180PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vjugina U, Evans JP (2008) New insights into the molecular basis of mammalian sperm-egg membrane interactions. Front Biosci 13:462–476PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vigil P (1989) Gamete membrane fusion in hamster spermatozoa with reacted equatorial segment. Gamete Res 23:203–213PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gardner AJ, Williams CJ, Evans JP (2007) Establishment of the mammalian membrane block to polyspermy: Evidence for calcium-dependent and -independent regulation. Reproduction 133:383–393PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McAvey BA, Wortzman GB, Williams CJ et al (2002) Involvement of calcium signaling and the actin cytoskeleton in the membrane block to polyspermy in mouse eggs. Biol Reprod 67:1342–1352PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gardner AJ, Evans JP (2006) Mammalian membrane block to polyspermy: new insights into how mammalian eggs prevent fertilisation by multiple sperm. Reprod Fertil Dev 18:53–61PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bleil JD, Wassarman PM (1983) Sperm-egg interactions in the mouse: sequence of events and induction of the acrosome reaction by a zona pellucida glycoprotein. Dev Biol 95:317–324PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schroeder AC, Schultz RM, Kopf GS et al (1990) Fetuin inhibits zona pellucida hardening and conversion of ZP2 to ZP2f during spontaneous mouse oocyte maturation in vitro in the absence of serum. Biol Reprod 43:891–897PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kalab P, Kopf GS, Schultz RM (1991) Modifications of the mouse zona pellucida during oocyte maturation and egg activation: effects of newborn calf serum and fetuin. Biol Reprod 45:783–787PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gahlay G, Gauthier L, Baibakov B et al (2010) Gamete recognition in mice depends on the cleavage status of an egg’s zona pellucida protein. Science 329:216–219PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Coy P, Gadea J, Romar R et al (2002) Effect of in vitrofertilization medium on the acrosome reaction, cortical reaction, zona pellucida hardening and in vitro development in pigs. Reproduction 124:279–288PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Coy P, Avilés M (2010) What controls polyspermy in mammals, the oviduct or the oocyte? Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 85:593–605PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Papi M, Brunelli R, Sylla L et al (2010) Mechanical properties of zona pellucida hardening. Eur Biophys J 39:987–92PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wassarman PM, Litscher ES (2009) The multifunctional zona pellucida and mammalian fertilization. J Reprod Immunol 83:45–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Canovas S, Romar R, Grullon LA et al (2009) Pre-fertilization zona pellucida hardening by different cross-linkers affects IVF in pigs and cattle and improves embryo production in pigs. Reproduction 137:803–812PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Avilés M, Gutiérrez-Adán A, Coy P (2010) Oviductal secretions: Will they be key factors for the future ARTs? Mol Hum Reprod 16:896–906Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tsai PS, Gadella BM (2009) Molecular kinetics of proteins at the surface of porcine sperm before and during fertilization. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl 66:23–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Boerke A, Dieleman SJ, Gadella BM (2007) A possible role for sperm RNA in early embryo development. Theriogenology 68:S147–S155PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cho C, Ge H, Branciforte D et al (2000) Analysis of mouse fertilin in wild-type and fertilin beta(-/-) sperm: evidence for C-terminal modification, alpha/beta dimerization, and lack of essential role of fertilin alpha in sperm-egg fusion. Dev Biol 222:289–295PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ghosh I, Datta K (2003)Sperm surface hyaluronan binding protein (HABP1) interacts with zona pellucida of water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) through its clustered mannose residues. Mol Reprod Dev 64:235–244PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rodeheffer C, Shur BD (2004) Sperm from beta1,4-galactosyltransferase I-null mice exhibit precocious capacitation. Development 131:491–501PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    van Gestel RA, Brewis IA, Ashton PR et al (2007) Multiple proteins present in purified porcine sperm apical plasma membranes interact with the zona pellucida of the oocyte. Mol Hum Reprod 13:445–454PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Montfort L, Frenette G, Sullivan R (2002) Sperm-zona pellucida interaction involves a carbonyl reductase activity in the hamster. Mol Reprod Dev 61:113–119PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shur BD, Rodeheffer C, Ensslin MA et al (2006) Identification of novel gamete receptors that mediate sperm adhesion to the egg coat. Mol Cell Endocrinol 250:137–148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Busso D, Cohen DJ, Maldera JA et al (2007) A novel function for CRISP1 in rodent fertilization: involvement in sperm-zona pellucida interaction. Biol Reprod 77:848–854PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Copland SD, Murphy AA, Shur BD (2009) The mouse gamete adhesin, SED1, is expressed on the surface of acrosome-intact human sperm. Fertil Steril 92:2014–2019PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Marín-Briggiler CI, González-Echeverría MF, Munuce MJ et al (2010) Glucose-regulated protein 78 (Grp78/BiP) is secreted by human oviduct epithelial cells and the recombinant protein modulates sperm-zona pellucida binding. Fertil Steril 93:1574–1584PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ensslin M, Calvete JJ, Thole HH et al (1995) Identification by affinity chromatography of boar sperm membrane-associated proteins bound to immobilized porcine zona pellucida. Mapping of the phosphorylethanolamine-binding region of spermadhesin AWN. Biol Chem Hoppe Seyler 376:733–738PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Caballero I, Vázquez JM, Rodríguez-Martínez H et al (2005) Influence of seminal plasma PSP-I/PSP-II spermadhesin on pig gamete interaction. Zygote 13:11–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Nixon B, MacIntyre DA, Mitchell LA et al (2006) The identification of mouse sperm-surface-associated proteins and characterization of their ability to act as decapacitation factors. Biol Reprod 74:275–287PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Manjunath P, Bergeron A, Lefebvre J et al (2007) Seminal plasma proteins: functions and interaction with protective agents during semen preservation. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl 65:217–228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Vadnais ML, Roberts KP 2010 Seminal plasma proteins inhibit in vitro- and cooling-induced capacitation in boar spermatozoa. Reprod Fertil Dev 22:893–900PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gadella BM, Tsai PS, Boerke A et al (2008) Sperm head membrane reorganisation during capacitation. Int J Dev Biol 52:473–480PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gadella BM, Visconti PE (2006) Regulation of capacitation. In: de Jonge C, Barrett C (eds) The sperm cell, production maturation fertilization regeneration. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Parrish JJ, Susko-Parrish J, Winer MA et al (1988) Capacitation of bovine sperm by heparin. Biol Reprod 38:1171–1180PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hung PH, Miller MG, Meyers SA et al (2008) Sperm mitochondrial integrity is not required for hyperactivated motility, zona binding, or acrosome reaction in the rhesus macaque. Biol Reprod 79:367–375PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kumar V, Kota V, Shivaji S (2008) Hamster sperm capacitation: role of pyruvate dehydrogenase A and dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase. Biol Reprod 79:190–199PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Eddy EM (2006) The spermatozoon. In: Knobil E, Neill JD (eds) Physiology of reproduction, (3rd edn). Elsevier, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    van Gestel RA, Brewis IA, Ashton PR et al (2005) Capacitation-dependent concentration of lipid rafts in the apical ridge head area of porcine sperm cells. Mol Hum Reprod 11:583–590PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Thaler CD, Thomas M, Ramalie JR (2006) Reorganization of mouse sperm lipid rafts by capacitation. Mol Reprod Dev 73:1541–1549PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Selvaraj V, Buttke DE, Asano A et al (2007) GM1 dynamics as a marker for membrane changes associated with the process of capacitation in murine and bovine spermatozoa. J Androl 28:588–599PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Wassarman PM (1988) Zona pellucida glycoproteins. Ann Rev Biochem 57:415–442PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Benoff S, Chu CC, Marmar JL et al (2007) Voltage-dependent calcium channels in mammalian spermatozoa revisited. Front Biosci 12:1420–1449PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ramalho-Santos J, Moreno RD, Sutovsky P et al (2000) SNAREs in mammalian sperm: possible implications for fertilization. Dev Biol 223:54–69PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    De Blas GA, Roggero CM, Tomes CN et al (2005) Dynamics of SNARE assembly and disassembly during sperm acrosomal exocytosis. PLoS Biol 3:e323PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Roggero CM, De Blas GA, Dai H et al (2007) Complexin/synaptotagmin interplay controls acrosomal exocytosis. J Biol Chem 282:26335–26343PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Zhao L, Burkin HR, Shi X et al (2007) Complexin I is required for mammalian sperm acrosomal exocytosis. Dev Biol 309:236–244PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Zhao L, Shi X, Li L, Miller DJ (2007) Dynamin 2 associates with complexins and is found in the acrosomal region of mammalian sperm. Mol Reprod Dev 74:750–757PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Lopez CI, Belmonte SA, De Blas GA et al (2007) Membrane-permeant Rab3A triggers acrosomal exocytosis in living human sperm. FASEB J 21:4121–4130PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Castillo Bennett J, Roggero CM, Mancifesta FE et al (2010) Calcineurin-mediated dephosphorylation of synaptotagmin VI is necessary for acrosomal exocytosis. J Biol Chem 285:26269–26278PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Ackermann F, Zitranski N, Heydecke D et al (2008) The Multi-PDZ domain protein MUPP1 as a lipid raft-associated scaffolding protein controlling the acrosome reaction in mammalian spermatozoa. J Cell Physiol 214:757–768PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Ackermann F, Zitranski N, Borth H et al (2009) CaMKIIalpha interacts with multi-PDZ domain protein MUPP1 in spermatozoa and prevents spontaneous acrosomal exocytosis. J Cell Sci 122:4547–4557PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Dunbar BS, Dudkiewicz AB, Bundman DS (1985) Proteolysis of specific porcine zona pellucida glycoproteins by boar acrosin. Biol Reprod 32:619–630PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Bleil JD, Greve JM, Wassarman PM (1988) Identification of a secondary sperm receptor in the mouse egg zona pellucida: role in maintenance of binding of acrosome-reacted sperm to eggs. Dev Biol 128:376–385PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Howes E, Pascall JC, Engel W, Jones R (2001) Interactions between mouse ZP2 glycoprotein and proacrosin; a mechanism for secondary binding of sperm to the zona pellucida during fertilization. J Cell Sci 114:4127–4136PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Miller DJ, Gong X, Shur BD (1993) Sperm require beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase to penetrate through the egg zona pellucida. Development 118:1279–1289PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Hao Z, Wolkowicz MJ, Shetty J et al (2002) SAMP32, a testis-specific, isoantigenic sperm acrosomal membrane-associated protein. Biol Reprod 66:735–744PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Bi M, Hickox JR, Winfrey VP et al (2003) Processing, localization and binding activity of zonadhesin suggest a function in sperm adhesion to the zona pellucida during exocytosis of the acrosome. Biochem J 375:477–488PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Shetty J, Wolkowicz MJ, Digilio LC et al (2003) SAMP14, a novel, acrosomal membrane-associated, glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored member of the Ly-6/urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor superfamily with a role in sperm-egg interaction. J Biol Chem 278:30506–30515PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Hayashi M, Yonezawa N, Katsumata T et al (2004) Activity of exoglycosidases in ejaculated spermatozoa of boar and bull. Zygote12:105–109PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Jagadish N, Rana R, Selvi R et al (2005) Characterization of a novel human sperm-associated antigen 9 (SPAG9) having structural homology with c-Jun N-terminal kinase-interacting protein. Biochem J 389:73–82PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Yu Y, Xu W, Yi YJ et al (2006) The extracellular protein coat of the inner acrosomal membrane is involved in zona pellucida binding and penetration during fertilization: characterization of its most prominent polypeptide (IAM38) Dev Bio 290:32–43Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Ziyyat A, Rubinstein E, Monier-Gavelle F et al (2006) CD9 controls the formation of clusters that contain tetraspanins and the integrin a6b1, which are involved in human and mouse gamete fusion. J Cell Sci 119:416–424PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Fujihara Y, Murakami M, Inoue N et al (2010) Sperm equatorial segment protein 1, SPESP1, is required for fully fertile sperm in the mouse. J Cell Si 123:531–1536Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Kaji K, Oda S, Shikano T et al (2000) The gamete fusion process is defective in eggs of CD9-deficient mice. Nat Genet 24:279–282PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Le Naour F, Rubinstein E, Jasmin C et al (2000) Severely reduced female fertility in CD9-deficient mice. Science 287:319–321PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Maleszewski M, Kimura Y, Yanagimachi R (1996) Sperm membrane incorporation into oolemma contributes to the oolemma block to sperm penetration: evidence based on intracytoplasmic sperm injection experiments in the mouse. Mol Reprod Dev 44:256–259PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Okabe M, Yagasaki M, Oda H et al (1988) Effect of a monoclonal anti-mouse sperm antibody (OBF13) on the interaction of mouse sperm with zona-free mouse and hamster eggs. J Reprod Immunol 13:211–219PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Inoue N, Kasahara T, Ikawa M et al (2010) Identification and disruption of sperm-specific angiotensin converting enzyme-3 (ACE3) in mouse. PLoS ONE 5: e10301PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Yáñez-Mó M, Barreiro O, Gordon-Alonso M et al (2009) Tetraspanin-enriched microdomains; a functional unit in cell plasma membranes. Trends Cell Biol 19:434–446PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Rubinstein E, Ziyyat A, Prenant M et al (2006) Reduced fertility of female mice lacking CD81. Dev Biol 290:351–358PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Tiede A, Nischan C, Schubert J et al (2000) Characterisation of the enzymatic complex for the first step in glycosylphosphatidylinositol biosynthesis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 32:339–350PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Alfieri JA, Martin AD, Takeda J et al (2003) Infertility in female mice with an oocyte-specific knockout of GPI-anchored proteins. J Cell Sci 116:2149–2155PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Ellerman DA, Pei J, Gupta S et al (2009) Izumo is part of a multiprotein family whose members form large complexes on mammalian sperm. Mol Reprod Dev 76:1188–1199PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Inoue N, Ikawa M, Isotani A et al (2005) The immunoglobulin superfamily protein Izumo is required for sperm to fuse with eggs. Nature 434:234–238PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Han C, Choi E, Park I et al (2009) Comprehensive analysis of reproductive ADAMs: Relationship of ADAM4 and ADAM6 with an ADAM complex required for fertilization in mice. Biol Reprod 80:1001–1008PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Stein KK, Go JC, Primakoff P et al (2005) Defects in secretory pathway trafficking during sperm development in Adam2 knockout mice. Biol Reprod 73:1032–1038PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Sosnik J, Miranda PV, Spiridonov NA et al (2009) Tssk6 is required for Izumo relocalization and gamete fusion in the mouse. J Cell Sci 122:2741–2749PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Lewis WH, Wright ES (1935) On the early development of the mouse egg. Carnegie Inst Contrib Embryol 25:113–143Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Odor DL, Blandau RJ (1949) The frequency of supernumerary sperm in rat ova. Anat Rec 104:1–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Austin CR (1961) The mammalian egg. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, ILGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Hunter RH (1990) Fertilization of pig eggs in vivo and in vitro. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 40:211–226PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Sengoku K, Tamate K, Horikawa M et al (1995) Plasma membrane block to polyspermy in human oocytes and preimplantation embryos. J Reprod Fertil 105:85–90PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Hunter RH, Vajta G, Hyttel P (1998) Long-term stability of the bovine block to polyspermy. J Exp Zool 280:182–188PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Wolf DE, Edidin M, Handyside AH (1981) Changes in the organization of the mouse egg plasma membrane upon fertilization and first cleavage: Indications from the lateral diffusion rates of fluorescent lipid analogues. Dev Biol 85:195–198PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Wolf DE, Ziomek CA (1983) Regionalization and lateral diffusion of membrane proteins in unfertilized and fertilized mouse eggs. J Cell Biol 96:1786–1790PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Larson SM, Lee HJ, Hung PH et al (2010) Cortical mechanics and meiosis II completion in mammalian oocytes are mediated by myosin-II and Ezrin-Radixin-Moesin (ERM) proteins. Mol Biol Cell 21:3182–3192Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Wolf DP, Nicosia SV, Hamada M (1979) Premature cortical granule loss does not prevent sperm penetration of mouse eggs. Dev Biol 71:22–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Horvath PM, Kellom T, Caulfield J et al (1993) Mechanistic studies of the plasma membrane block to polyspermy in mouse eggs. Mol Reprod Dev 34:65–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Maleszewski M, Kimura Y, Yanagimachi R (1996) Sperm membrane incorporation into oolemma contributes to the oolemma block to sperm penetration: evidence based on intracytoplasmic sperm injection experiments in the mouse. Mol Reprod Dev 44:256–259PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Wortzman-Show GB, Kurokawa M et al (2007) Calcium and sperm components in the establishment of the membrane block to polyspermy: studies of ICSI and activation with sperm factor. Mol Human Reprod 13:557–565Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Dale B, Wilding M, Coppola G, Tosti E (2010) How do spermatozoa activate oocytes? Reprod Biomed Online 21:1–3PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Hoodbhoy T, Talbot P (2001) Characterization, fate, and function of hamster cortical granule components. Mol Reprod Dev 58:223–235PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Tsai PS, van Haeften T, Gadella BM (2010) Preparation of the cortical reaction: maturation depdent migration of SNARE proteins, clathrin and complexin to the porcine oocyte’s surface blocks membrane traffic until fertilization. Biol Reprod doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.110.085647Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Gwatkin RB, Williams DT, Hartmann JF et al (1973) The zona reaction of hamster and mouse eggs: production in vitro by a trypsin-like protease from cortical granules. J Reprod Fertil 32:259–265PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Wolf DP, Hamada M (1977) Induction of zonal and egg plasma membrane blocks to sperm penetration in mouse eggs with cortical granule exudate. Biol Reprod 17:350–354PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Ducibella T (1996) The cortical reaction and development of activation competence in mammalian oocytes. Hum Reprod Update 2:29–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Hoodbhoy T, Talbot P (1994) Mammalian cortical granules: contents, fate, and function. Mol Reprod Dev 39:439–448PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Izadyar F, Hage WJ, Colenbrander B et al (1988) The promotory effect of growth hormone on the developmental competence of in vitro matured bovine oocytes is due to improved cytoplasmic maturation. Mol Reprod Dev 49:444–453Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Abbott AL, Fissore RA, Ducibella T (2001) Identification of a translocation deficiency in cortical granule secretion in preovulatory mouse oocytes. Biol Reprod 65:1640–1647PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Tae JC, Kim EY, Jeon K et al (2008) A MAPK pathway is involved in the control of cortical granule reaction and mitosis during bovine fertilization. Mol Reprod Dev 75:1300–1306PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Sun QY (2003) Cellular and molecular mechanisms leading to cortical reaction and polyspermy block in mammalian eggs. Microsc Res Tech 61:342–348PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Florman HM, Ducibella T (2006) Fertilization in mammals. In: Knobil E, Neill JD (eds) Physiology of reproduction, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Zarelli VE, Ruete MC, Roggero CM et al (2009) PTP1B dephosphorylates N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor and elicits SNARE complex disassembly during human sperm exocytosis. J Biol Chem 284:10491–10503PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Miyado K, Yamada G, Yamada S et al (2000) Requirement of CD9 on the egg plasma membrane for fertilization. Science 287:321–324PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    He ZY, Brakebusch C, Fassler R et al (2003) None of the integrins known to be present on the mouse egg or to be ADAM receptors are essential for sperm–egg binding and fusion. Dev Biol 254:226–237PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Miller BJ, Georges-Labouesse E, Primakoff P et al (2000) Normal fertilization occurs with eggs lacking the integrin alpha6beta1 and is CD9-dependent. J Cell Biol 149:1289–1295PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Baessler K, Lee Y, Sampson N (2009) Beta1 integrin is an adhesion protein for sperm binding to eggs. ACS Chem Biol 4:357–366PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Evans JP (2009) Egg integrins: back in the game of mammalian fertilization. ACS Chem Biol 4:321–323PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Vjugina U, Zhu X, Oh E et al (2009) Reduction of mouse egg surface integrin alpha9 subunit (ITGA9) reduces the egg’s ability to support sperm-egg binding and fusion. Biol Reprod 80:833–841PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Eto K, Huet C, Tarui T et al (2002) Functional classification of ADAMs based on a conserved motif for binding to integrin alpha9beta1: implications for sperm-egg binding and other cell interactions. J Biol Chem 277:17804–17810PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Inoue N, Ikawa M, Isotani A et al (2005) The immunoglobulin superfamily protein Izumo is required for sperm to fuse with eggs. Nature 434:234–238PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Bigler D, Takahashi Y, Chen MS et al (2000) Sequence-specific interaction between the disintegrin domain of mouse ADAM2 (fertilin b) and murine eggs: Role of the a6 integrin subunit. J Biol Chem 275:11576–11584PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Takahashi Y, Bigler D, Ito Y et al (2001) Sequence-specific interaction between the disintegrin domain of mouse ADAM3 and murine eggs: Role of the beta1 integrin-associated proteins CD9, CD81, and CD98. Mol Biol Cell 12:809–820PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Zhu X, Bansal NP, Evans JP (2000) Identification of key functional amino acids of the mouse fertilin beta (ADAM2) disintegrin loop for cell-cell adhesion during fertilization. J Biol Chem 275:7677–7683PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Cuasnicu PS, Conesa D, Rochwerger L (1990) Potential contraceptive use of an epididymal protein that participates in fertilization. In: Alexander NJ, Griffin D, Speiler JM, Waites GMH (eds) Gamete Interaction: Prospects for Immunocontraception. Wiley-Liss, New York, NY, pp. 143–153Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Cuasnicu, PS, Gonzalez-Echeverria MF, Piazza AD et al (1984) Antibody against epididymal glycoprotein blocks fertilizing ability in rats. J Reprod Fert 72:467–471Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    Da Ros VG, Maldera JA, Willis WD et al (2008) Impaired sperm fertilizing ability in mice lacking Cysteine-RIch Secretory Protein 1 (CRISP1). Dev Biol 320:12–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Wolkowicz MJ, Shetty J, Westbrook A (2003) Equatorial segment protein defines a discrete acrosomal subcompartment persisting throughout acrosomeal biogenesis. Biol Reprod 69:735–745PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Toshimori K, Saxena DK, Tanii I et al (1998) An MN9 antigenic molecule, equatorin, is required for successful sperm-oocyte fusion in mice. Biol Reprod 59:22–29PubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Yamatoya K, Yoshida K, Ito C et al (2009) Equatorin: identification and characterization of the epitope of the MN9 antibody in mouse. Biol Reprod 81:889–897PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Herrero MB, Mandal A, Digilio LC et al (2005) Mouse SLLP1, a sperm lysozyme-like protein involved in sperm-egg binding and fertilization. Dev Biol 284:126–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Mandal A, Klotz KL, Shetty J et al (2003) SLLP1, A unique, intra-acrosomal, non-bacteriolytic, c lysozyme-like protein of human spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 68:1525–1537PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Shetty J, Wolkowicz MJ, Digilio LC et al (2003) SAMP14, a novel, acrosomal membrane-associated, glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored member of the Ly-6/urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor superfamily with a role in sperm-egg interaction. J Biol Chem 278:30506–30515PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Correa LM, Cho C, Myles DG et al (2000) A role for a TIMP-3-sensitive Zn2+-dependent metalloprotease in mammalian gamete membrane fusion. Dev Biol 225:124–134PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Ellerman DA, Myles DG, Primakoff P (2006) A role for sperm surface protein disulfide isomerase activity in gamete fusion: evidence for the participation of ERp57. Dev Cell 10:831–837PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Mammoto A, Masumoto N, Tahara M et al (1997) Involvement of a sperm protein sensitive to sulfhydry-depleting reagents in mouse sperm-egg fusion. J Exp Zool 278:178–188PubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Wilson DW, Wilcox CA, Flynn GC (1989) A fusion protein required for vesicle-mediated transport in both mammalian cells and yeast. Nature 339:355–359PubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Fenouillet E, Barbouche R, Courageot J et al (2001) The catalytic activity of protein disulfide isomerase is involved in human immunodeficiency virus envelope-mediated membrane fusion after CD4 cell binding. J Infect Dis 183:744–752PubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Ou W, Silver J (2006) Role of protein disulfide isomerase and other thiol-reactive proteins in HIV-1 envelope protein-mediated fusion. Virology 350:406–417PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departments of Biochemistry and Cell Biology and of Farm Animal Health, Research Program: Biology of Reproductive Cells, Faculty of Veterinary MedicineUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Division of Reproductive Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular BiologyBloomberg School of Public Health, John Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations