Teachers’ Feedback to Pupils: “Like So Many Bottles Thrown Out to Sea”?

Chapter
Part of the Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects book series (EDAP, volume 14)

Abstract

This article draws on existing research about feedback, and also on teachers’ perceptions of feedback, in order to throw light on the roles feedback can play in supporting learning within the classroom. It addresses the “common but puzzling observation that even when teachers provide students with valid and reliable judgements about the quality of their work, improvement does not necessarily follow” (Sadler, 1989). The article draws on a survey of 88 teachers as to how feedback becomes effective. The teachers were invited to complete the sentence, “Feedback becomes effective when…. ”. The article concludes that it is the social and personal aspects of feedback that may constitute the missing piece to Sadler’s (1989) puzzle: pupils are more likely to make constructive meaning out of feedback messages when teachers recognize the influence of social and personal aspects, as well as of the content and form, of feedback.

Keywords

Learning Objective Personal Factor Successful Learning Feedback Message Effective Feedback 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Many thanks are due to Professors David Scott, Gordon Stobart and Dylan Wiliam for their extremely helpful comments on earlier drafts of this chapter.

References

  1. Allal, L., & Mottier Lopez, L. (2005). Formative assessment of learning: A review of publications in French. In J. Looney (Ed.), Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms (pp. 241–264). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  2. Askew, S., & Lodge, C. (2001). Gifts, ping-pong and loops – linking feedback to learning. In S. Askew (Ed.), Feedback for learning (pp. 1–18). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Azevedo, R., & Bernard, R. (1995). A meta-analysis of the effects of feedback in computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13(2), 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biggs, J., & Moore, P. (1993). The process of learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: principles, policy and practice, 5(1), 7–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2006). Assessment for learning in the classroom. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 9–25). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Boekaerts, M. (1993). Being concerned with well being and with learning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 149–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boekaerts, M. (2006). Self-regulation and effort investment. In K. A. Renninger & I. E. Sigel (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Child psychology in practice (Vol. 4, 6th ed., pp. 345–377). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Butler, D., & Winne, P. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281.Google Scholar
  10. Dann, R. (2002). Promoting assessment as learning: Improving the learning process. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  11. Dennison, B., & Kirk, R. (1990). Do, review, learn, apply: A simple guide to experiential learning. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Hargreaves, E., McCallum, B., & Gipps, C. (2000). Teacher feedback strategies in primary classrooms: New evidence. In S. Askew (Ed.), Feedback for learning (pp. 21–31). London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  13. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Henderlong, J., & Lepper, M. (2002). The effects of praise on children’s intrinsic motivation: A review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 128(5), 774–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kluger, A., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mason, B., & Bruning, R. (2001). Providing feedback in computer-based instruction: what the research tells us. Accessed July 22, 2010, from http://dwb4.unl.edu/dwb/Research/MB/MasonBruning.html
  17. Mory, E. (2004). Feedback research review. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 745–783). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  18. Murnane, R., & Levy, F. (1996). Teaching the new basic skills. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  19. Narciss, S., & Huth, K. (2004). How to design informative tutoring feedback for multi-media learning. In H. Niegemann, R. Brunken, & D. Leutner (Eds.), Instructional design for multimedia learning (pp. 181–195). Munster: Waxman.Google Scholar
  20. Perrenoud, P. (1998). From formative evaluation to a controlled regulation of learning. Towards a wider conceptual field. Assessment in Education: Principles Policy and Practice, 5(1), 85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pollard, A. (1990). Towards a sociology of learning in primary school. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 11, 241–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pryor, J., & Crossouard, B. (2008). A socio-cultural theorisation of formative assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 34(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pryor, J., & Torrance, H. (1998). Formative assessment in the classroom: Where psychological theory meets social practice. Social Psychology of Education, 2, 151–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sadler, D. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shute, V. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Torrance, H. (2007). Assessment as learning? How the use of explicit learning objectives, assessment criteria and feedback in post-secondary education and training can come to dominate learning. Assessment in Education, 14(3), 281–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tunstall, P., & Gipps, C. (1996a). Teacher feedback to young children in formative assessment: A typology. British Educational Research Journal, 22(4), 389–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tunstall, P., & Gipps, C. (1996b). ‘How does your teacher help you make your work better?’ Children’s understanding of formative assessment. Curriculum Journal, 7(2), 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Watkins, C. (2003). Learning: A sense-maker’s guide. London: ATL.Google Scholar
  32. Wiliam, D. (2007). Keeping learning on track: Classroom assessment and the regulation of learning. In F. K. Lester, Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1053–1098). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of EducationUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations