Assessment for Learning: Research and Policy in the (Dis)United Kingdom

Chapter
Part of the Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects book series (EDAP, volume 14)

Abstract

Developments in the United Kingdom, with respect to Assessment for Learning (AfL), need to be understood in relation to interactions between research and policy. On the one hand, AfL ideas and practices have been developed, defined, refined and disseminated by members of the educational research community, and especially by members of the UK Assessment Reform Group. On the other hand, they have been interpreted, reinterpreted and incorporated into national policy by government agencies to meet goals of educational reform. This chapter describes the policy contexts and the distinct ways in which AfL has been taken up and implemented in each of the four countries of the UK, and the extent of policy borrowing among them. Divergence between England and the other three countries is explored and attributed to differences in: understandings of ideas about “learning” and “performance”; beliefs about which practices and aspects of overall assessment policy will raise standards; and the relationships between researchers and policy-makers. Effective educational change for the benefit of learners and learning will require researchers and policy-makers to maintain a continuing dialogue in order to deepen understanding of the relationship between assessment and learning, and to tackle issues associated with “going to scale”. Researchers, especially, will need to engage in ongoing creative mediation so that AfL ideas and practices are renewed in ways congruent with defensible purposes.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author of this paper is indebted to Richard Daugherty, Carmel Gallagher and Louise Hayward who suggested improvements with respect to the accounts of policy and practice in Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland, respectively. However, any faults that remain are the author’s alone.

References

  1. Assessment Reform Group. (2002a). Assessment for Learning: 10 principles. Assessment Reform Group. http://www.assessment-reform-group.org. Accessed 22 January 2011.
  2. Assessment Reform Group. (2002b). Testing, motivation and learning. Assessment Reform Group. http://www.assessment-reform-group.org. Accessed 22 January 2011.
  3. Black, P. J. (1997). Whatever happened to TGAT? In C. Cullingford (Ed.), Assessment versus evaluation (pp. 24–50). London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  4. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Maidenhead: Open University Books.Google Scholar
  5. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, policy & practice, 5(1), 7–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clarke, S. (2001). Unlocking formative assessment. Abingdon: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
  7. Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA). (2006). Assessment for learning report. Belfast: Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment.Google Scholar
  8. DARG. (2004). Learning pathways through statutory assessment: Key stages 2 and 3. Final report. Cardiff: Welsh Assembly Government.Google Scholar
  9. Daugherty, R. (2007). Mediating academic research: The Assessment Reform Group experience. Research Papers in Education, 22(2), 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Department for Children, Education, Lifelong Learning and Skills (DCELLS). (2008). Curriculum and assessment update, Issue 4, Spring. Cardiff: DCELLS, Welsh Assembly Government.Google Scholar
  11. Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF). (2008). The Assessment for Learning strategy. London: DCSF re: 00341-2008DOM-EN. http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/publications. Accessed 22 January 2011.
  12. Department for Education and Skills (DfES). (2007a). Leading improvement using the Primary Framework: Primary National Strategy Guidance for primary headteachers and school leaders. London: DfES re: 00484-2007BKT-EN. http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/publications. Accessed 22 January 2011.
  13. Department for Education and Skills (DfES). (2007b). Assessment for Learning – 8 schools project report: Secondary National Strategy Guidance for School leaders, teachers, school improvement advisers and national policy makers. London: DfES ref: 00067-2007BKT-EN. http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/publications. Accessed 22 January 2011.
  14. Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadephia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  15. Elliott, J. (1990). Educational research in crisis. British Educational Research Journal, 16(1), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gardner, J. (Ed.). (2006). Assessment and learning. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Gardner, J., & Cowan, P. (2000). Testing the test: A study of the reliability and validity of the Northern Ireland transfer procedure test in enabling the selection of pupils for grammar school places. Belfast: School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast.Google Scholar
  18. Gardner, J., & Cowan, P. (2005). The fallibility of high stakes ‘11-plus’ testing in Northern Ireland. Assessment in Education, 12(2), 145–165.Google Scholar
  19. Gardner, J., Harlen, W., Hayward, L., & Stobart, G. (2008). Changing Assessment Practice: Process, principles and standards. ISBN 9780853899297. http://www.aria.qub.ac.uk. Accessed 22 January 2011.
  20. Hargreaves, D. (1996). Teaching as a research-based profession: Possibilities and prospects. London: Teacher Training Agency Annual Lecture.Google Scholar
  21. Hayward, L., Spencer, E., & Simpson, M. (2006). Assessment is for learning: Exploring programme success. The Aifl formative assessment project. Glasgow: University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
  22. Hillage, J., Pearson, R., Anderson, A., & Tamkin, P. (1998). Excellence in research on schools. London: Department for Education and Employment.Google Scholar
  23. James, M., McCormick, R., Black, P., Carmichael, P., Drummond, M. -J., & Fox, A., et al. (2007). Improving learning how to learn: Classrooms, schools and networks. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Klenowski, V. (2009). Assessment for learning revisited: An Asia-Pacific perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 263–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Miles, A. (2008). Today’s SATs result: Government 0 Pupils 0, Times Online. 6 August. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/alice_miles. Accessed 22 January 2011.
  26. Mullis, I., Martin, M., Kennedy, A., & Foy, P. (2007). PIRLS 2006 international report: IEA’s Progress in International Reading Literacy in Primary Schools in 40 countries. Boston: Boston College. http://timss.bc.edu/pirls2006/intl_rpt.html. Accessed 22 January 2011.
  27. Pollard, A. (2005). Taking the initiative? TLRP and educational research. Educational Review Guest Lecture, 12th October 2005, School of Education, University of Birmingham. http://www.tlrp.org. Accessed 22 January 2011.
  28. Scottish Government. (2005). AifL – Assessment is for Learning information sheet. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2005/09/20105413/54156. Accessed 22 January 2011.
  29. Senge, P., & Scharmer, O. (2001). Community action research: Learning as a community of practitioners, consultants, and researchers. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations