Fossils with Little Relief: Using Lasers to Conserve, Image, and Analyze the Ediacara Biota

  • Jonathan B. Antcliffe
  • Martin D. Brasier
Part of the Topics in Geobiology book series (TGBI, volume 36)


Fifty years have now passed since the discovery of Charnia masoni and Charniodiscus concentricus in Charnwood Forest, UK. But what is Charnia? And how was it related to the great explosion of animal fossils at the base of the Cambrian that it immediately predates? Recent studies focussing on the growth dynamics and morphology of the group have been greatly aided by the use of innovative photographic and laser scanning techniques that allow the fossils to be analyzed to new levels of detail. Laser methods allow us to build a virtual map of each major fossil type that can then be viewed and rotated in three dimensions. Laser scanning can be undertaken up to a maximum precision of 1/20 mm. Lasers can be applied in the laboratory to collected specimens, or casts, or alternatively directly in the field to in situ specimens when working within fossil conservation areas. Taking laser scans of fossils is completely non-invasive, even unlike casting, the chemicals involved in which can damage delicate fossil surfaces. It is now being seen as a major new tool to aid in the preservation of critical fossil data. Where specimens remain in situ in the field, laser scans can be used to monitor the degradation of the fossils. Laser-based conservation of key fossil sites and specimens in England and Newfoundland is now being planned. We have applied this technique to critical fossil cites in Charnwood Forest and to key Ediacaran fossils from the UK, Newfoundland, Australia, and Russia, including Ivesheadia, Fractofusus, Charnia, Charniodiscus, Bradgatia, and Dickinsonia. Further, we shall review the ever expanding application of laser scanning techniques to a variety of paleontological problems exemplified by several diverse case studies, from dinosaur biomechanics to hexapod taxonomy. Laser scanning is increasingly been seen as a game changing technique in paleontology, that can not only conserve fossils and help with their analysis but also to widen access to highly restricted and critically important fossils.


Ediacara Biota Lasers Macrofossils High resolution scanning Precambrian 


  1. Antcliffe JB, Brasier MD (2008) Charnia at 50: developmental models for Ediacaran fronds. Palaeontology 51:11–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barthel KW (1978) Solnhofen. Ein Blick in die Erdgeschichte. Ott, ThunGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates KT, Rarity F, Manning PL, Hodgetts D, Vila B, Oms O, Galobart A, Gawthorpe RL (2008) High-resolution LiDAR and photogrammetric survey of the Fumanya dinosaur tracksites (Catalonia): implications for the conservation and interpretation of geological heritage sites. J Geol Soc Lond 165:115–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bates KT, Manning PL, Hodgetts D, Sellers WI (2009) Estimating mass properties of dinosaurs using laser imaging and 3D computer modelling. PLoSONE 4:e4532. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004532 Google Scholar
  5. Béthoux O, Mcbride J, Maul C (2004) Surface laser scanning on fossil insects. Palaeontology 47:13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boynton HE, Ford TD (1995) Ediacaran fossils from the Precambrian (Charnian Supergroup) of Charnwood Forest, Leicestershire, England. Mercian Geol 13:165–182Google Scholar
  7. Brasier MD, Antcliffe JB (2008) Dickinsonia from Ediacara: a new look at morphology and body construction. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 270:311–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brasier MD, Antcliffe JB (2009) Evolutionary relationships within the Avalonian Ediacara biota: new insights from laser analysis. J Geol Soc Lond 166:363–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brasier MD, Antcliffe JB, Callow RHT (2010) Taphonomy in the Ediacaran interval. In: Allison PA, Bottjer D (eds) Taphonomy: bias and process through time. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  10. Breithaupt BH, Matthews NA, Noble TA (2004) An integrated approach to three-dimensional data collection of dinosaur tracksites in the Rocky Mountain West. Ichnos 11:11–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Callow RHT, Brasier MD (2009) A solution to Darwin’s Dilemma of 1859: exceptional preservation in Salter’s material from the Ediacaran Longmyndian Supergroup, England. J Geol Soc 166:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fedonkin MA, Ivantsov AYu, Lenov MV, Lipps JH, Serezhnikova EA, Malyutin EI, Khan YV (2009) Paleo-piracy endangers Vendian (Ediacaran) fossils in the White Sea – Arkhangelsk region of Russia. In: Lipps JH, Granier BRC (eds) PaleoParks – The protection and conservation of fossil sites worldwide. Carnets de Géologie/Notebooks on Geology, Brest, Book 2009/03, pp 103–111Google Scholar
  13. Ford TE (1958) Precambrian fossils from Charnwood Forest. Proc Yorks Geol Soc 31:211–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gehling JG (1991) The case for the Ediacaran fossil roots to the metazoan tree. Geol Soc Ind Mem 20:181–224Google Scholar
  15. Gehling JG (1999) Microbial mats in terminal Proterozoic siliciclastics: Ediacaran death masks. Palaios 14:40–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glaessner MF (1958) New fossils from the base of the Cambrian in South Australia. Trans R Soc S Aust 81:185–188Google Scholar
  17. Glaessner MF (1966) Precambrian palaeontology. Earth Sci Rev 1:29–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Glaessner MF (1984) The dawn of animal life: a biohistorical study. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 256 ppGoogle Scholar
  19. Glaessner MF, Daily B (1959) The geology and late Precambrian fauna of the Ediacara fossil reserve. Rec S Aust Mus 13:369–410, Plates XLII – XLVIIGoogle Scholar
  20. Glaessner MF, Wade M (1966) The late Precambrian fossils from Ediacara, South Australia. Palaeontology 9:599–628Google Scholar
  21. Grazhdankin D (2003) Structure and depositional environment of the Vendian Complex in the Southeastern White Sea area. Stratigr Geol Correl 11:313–331Google Scholar
  22. Grazhdankin D (2004) Patterns of distribution in the Ediacaran biotas: facies versus biogeography and evolution. Paleobiology 30:203–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grazhdankin D, Seilacher A (2002) Underground Vendobionta from Namibia. Palaeontology 45:57–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grazhdankin D, Seilacher A (2005) A re-examination of the Nama-type Vendian organism Rangea schneiderhoehni. Geol Mag 142:571–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hagadorn J, Bottjer DJ (1997) Wrinkle structures: microbially-mediated sedimentary structures common in subtidal silicilastic settings at the Proterozoic-Phanerozoic transition. Geology 25:1047–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hammer Ø, Bengtson S, Malzbender T, Gelb D (2002) Imaging fossils using reflectance ­transformation and interactive manipulation of virtual light sources. Palaeontol Electron 5.
  27. Hou XG, Aldrdige RJ, Bergstrom J, Siveter DJ, Siveter DJ, Feng XH (2004) The Cambrian fossils of Chengjiang, China, The flowering of early animal life. Blackwell Science, Oxford, 256 pGoogle Scholar
  28. Jenkins RJF (1985) The enigmatic Ediacaran (late Precambrian) genus Rangea and related forms. Palaeobiology 11:336–355Google Scholar
  29. Jenkins RJF (1992) Functional and ecological aspects of Ediacaran assemblages. In: Lipps JH, Signor PW (eds) Origin and early evolution of the Metazoa. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y. pp 131–176Google Scholar
  30. Kuepp H (1977) Ultrafazies und Genese der Solnhofener Plattenkalke (Oberer Malm, Südliche Frankenalb). Abh Naturhist Ges Nürnberg 37:128Google Scholar
  31. Liu AG, Mcilroy D, Antcliffe JB, Brasier MD (2010) Effaced preservation in the Ediacara biota and its implications for the early macrofossil record. Palaeontology. Article published online: 22 DEC 2010. DOI:  10.1111/j.1475-4983.2010.01024.x
  32. Narbonne GM (2004) Modular construction in the Ediacara biota. Science 305:1141–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Narbonne GM (2005) The Ediacara biota: Neoproterozoic origin of animals and their ecosystems. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 33:421–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Narbonne GM, Saylor BZ, Grotzinger JP (1997) The youngest Ediacaran fossils from Southern Africa. J Paleontol 71:953–967Google Scholar
  35. Pflug HD (1970) Zur Fauna der Nama-Schichten in Sudwest-Afrika I, II. Palaeontogr. Abt. A, 134 (4–6), 226–262; 135 (3–6), 198–230. [in German]Google Scholar
  36. Pflug HD (1972) The Phanerozoic-cryptozoic boundary and the origin of Metazoa. In: 24th International Geological Congress, Montreal. Section 1: Precambrian geology, pp 58–67Google Scholar
  37. Rayfield EJ, Norman DB, Horner CC, Horner JR, Smith PM, Thomason JJ, Upchurch P (2000) Cranial design and function in a large theropod dinosaur. Nature 409:1033–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rayfield EJ, Norman DB, Upchurch P (2002) Prey attack by a large theropod dinosaur. Nature 416:388–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Seilacher A (1984) Late Precambrian and Early Cambrian Metazoa: preservational or real extinctions? In: Holland HD, Trendal AF (eds) Patterns of change in earth evolution. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 159–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Seilacher A (1985) Discussion of Precambrian Metazoa. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 311:47–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Seilacher A (1989) Vendozoa: organismic construction in the Proterozoic biosphere. Lethaia 22:229–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Seilacher A (1992) Vendobionta and Psammocorallia: lost constructions of Precambrian evolution. J Geol Soc Lond 149:607–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Viohl G (1990) Taphonomy of Fossil-Lagerstätten. Solnhofen Lithographic Limestones. In: Briggs DEG, Crowther PR (eds) Palaeobiology: a synthesis. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 285–289Google Scholar
  44. Vonnegut K (2005) A man without a country. Seven Stories, New York, 192ppGoogle Scholar
  45. Wade M (1968) Preservation of soft bodied animals in Precambrian sandstones at Ediacara, South Australia. Lethaia 1:238–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wade M (1972) Hydrozoa and Scyphozoa and other medusoids from the Precambrian Ediacara fauna, South Australia. Palaeontology 15:197–225Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Netherlands 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Earth SciencesUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  2. 2.Department of Earth SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations