Advertisement

High Strength Steels Fracture Toughness Variation by the Media

  • J. SánchezEmail author
  • J. Fullea
  • C. Andrade
Conference paper
Part of the RILEM Bookseries book series (RILEM, volume 5)

Abstract

The stress corrosion cracking process is at this moment an unknown mechanism of deterioration. It is a process that implies the joint action of the media, the presence of corrosion or a surface defect and of stress in the metal. Prestressing tendons can suffer SCC jointly with hydrogen embrittlement which dramatically changes not only the type of fracture (from ductile to brittle) but also the kinetics of the process leading to unexpected collapses. The metal should be resistant to this type of process which can be characterized by its toughness and therefore by its damage tolerance. This research shows that the Fracture Toughness change when the steel corrodes, questioning the idea that is an intrinsic characteristic of the material. The reduction in the fracture toughness of steel wires when they are in contact to aggressive media involve that the material fractures with a lower crack depth for the same stress level. That means that the material becomes less damage tolerant, which implies that it is necessary to detect defects of smaller size, as for example, small notch, pits or superficial cracks. In the paper some results of the percentage of decrease of the toughness of prestressing wires suffering corrosion are presented.

Keywords

Fracture Toughness Stress Intensity Factor High Strength Steel Stress Corrosion Stress Corrosion Crack 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Valiente A., Elices M. (1998), Eng. Fail. Anal. 5, 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Parkins R. N., Elices M., Sanchez-Galvez V., Caballero L. (1982), Corrosion Science 22, 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sanchez J., Fullea J., Andrade C., Alonso C. (2007), Corrosion Science 49, 4069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Toribio J. (2004), Materials Science and Engineering a-Structural Materials Properties Microstructure and Processing 387, 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sanchez J., Andrade C., Fullea J. (2009), Corrosion 65, 368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sanchez J. (2007), PhD Thesis. Complutense of Madrid.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Astiz M. A. (1986), International Journal of Fracture 31, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Levan A., Royer J. (1993), International Journal of Fracture 61, 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    ABAQUS (2005).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Irwin G. R. (1957), Journal of Applied Mechanics 24, 361.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sanchez J., Fullea J., Andrade C., de Andres P. L. (2010), Physical Review B 81, 132102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sanchez J., Fullea J., Andrade C., de Andres P. L. (2009) Diffusion in Materials – Dimat 2008 289-292, 203.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sanchez J., Fullea J., Andrade C., de Andres P. L. (2008) Physical Review B 78, 014113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Eduardo Torroja of Construction Science Institute (IETcc-CISDEM-UPM-CSIC)MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations