Vegetation Phenology in Global Change Studies
Global change, encompassing natural and anthropogenic changes to the Earth system at sub-annual to geologic time scales, has strong interactions with vegetation phenology. In this chapter we will refer to global change as alterations to the Earth system that are certainly or probably influenced by human activity, primarily since the industrial revolution. This form of global change includes irrefutable anthropogenic alterations to terrestrial land cover and alterations to the global climate that are probably anthropogenically influenced. Within this context we discuss three aspects of vegetation phenology: the influence of vegetation phenology on general circulation models (GCMs); a wavelet analysis of phenological patterns and associated evidence of likely phenological responses to direct human-induced land cover alteration; and third, serious challenges regarding the use of phenological data and concepts in global change research.
KeywordsGlobal Change Growing season length Land-atmosphere interactions Wavelets AVHRR
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bonan, G. B., A Land Surface Model (LSM version 1.0) for ecological, hydrological, and atmospheric studies: Technical description user’s guide, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, 150 pp., 1996.Google Scholar
- Bonan, G. B., S. Levis, L. Kergoat, and K W. Oleson, Landscapes as patches of plant functional types: an integrating concept for climate and ecosystem models, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, In press, 2002a.Google Scholar
- Bonan, G. B., S. Levis, S. Sitch, M. Vertenstein, and K. W. Oleson, A dynamic global vegetation model for use with climate models: concepts and description of simulated vegetation dynamics, Global Change Biol., Submitted, 2002b.Google Scholar
- Coops, N., Improvement in predicting stand growth of Pinus radiata (D. Don) across landscapes using NOAA AVHRR and Landsat MSS imagery combined with a forest growth process model (3-PGs), Photogram. Eng. Remote Sens., 65, 1149–1156, 1999.Google Scholar
- Cramer, W., A. Bondeau, F. I. Woodward, I. C. Prentice, R. A. Betts, V. Brovkin, P. M. Cox, V. Fisher, J. A. Foley, A. D. Friend, C. Kucharik, M. R. Lomas, N. Ramankutty, S. Sitch, B. Smith, A. White, and C. Young-Molling, Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO2 and climate change: results from six dynamic global vegetation models, Global Change Biol., 7, 357–373, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Csillag, F., and S. Kabos, Wavelets, boundaries, and the spatial analysis of landscape patterns, Écoscience, 9, 177–190, 2002.Google Scholar
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Working Group I, Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.Google Scholar
- Mallat, S., A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing, Academic Press, New York, 577 pp., 1999.Google Scholar
- Miller, D. A., and R. A. White, A conterminous United States multilayer soil characteristics dataset for regional climate and hydrology modeling (on line), Earth Interactions, paper 1, 1998.Google Scholar
- Nemani, R. R., M. A. White, P. E. Thornton, K. Nishida, S. Reddy, J. Jenkins, and S. Running, Recent trends in hydrologic balance have enhanced the terrestrial carbon sink in the United States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, art. no. 1468, 2002.Google Scholar
- White, M. A., M. D. Schwartz, and S. W. Running, Young students, satellites aid understanding of climate-biosphere link, EOS Trans. AGU, 81, 1,5, 1999.Google Scholar