Environmental Risk Factors in Connection with Hospital Laundry Effluent

Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC, volume 2)

Abstract

This chapter presents research findings on how to optimize a washing process to reduce the effluent burden of hospitals thus achieving a more sustainable laundering procedure. Water is used in large quantities in laundries and currently they are producing relatively high quantities of wastewater. Effluent control is especially important in hospitals where potentially pathogenic microorganisms are present. A program for hospital bed linen was investigated and the first steps of optimization were performed. The disinfection effect of the laundering procedure was determined using standard bioindicators Enterococcus faecium and Staphylococcus aureus. The washing quality was also determined by measuring the parameters of the RAL-GZ 992 criteria for hospital textiles and the effluent quality was determined by measuring the parameters in the waste water according to the Slovenian regulations for concentration limits of emission into water or waste water treatment plants for waste water from laundries and dry-cleaners, published in Slovenian Official Gazette in 2007 (Uredba o emisiji snovi pri odvajanju odpadne vode iz naprav za pranje in kemično čiščenje tekstilij 2007). The disinfection effect and washing quality were both attained in the optimized program. However due to higher concentrations of laundering agents the quality of the waste water was reduced after optimization of the program. Therefore the effluent waste water treatment for water reuse remained necessary.

Keywords

Chemical Oxygen Demand Waste Water Treatment Plant Bleaching Agent Peroxyacetic Acid Chemical Wear 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barrie D, Hoffman PN, Wilson JA, Kramer JM (1994) Contamination of hospital Linen by Bacillus Cereus. Epidemiol Infect 113(2):297–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borg MA, Portelli A (1999) Hospital laundry workers – an at-risk group for hepatitis A? Occup Med 49(7):448–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borneff-Lipp M, Christiansen B, Eggers HJ, Exner M, Gunerman KO, Heeg P et al (1998) Disinfection commission of the German Society for hygiene and microbiology. Chemotermische Wäschedesinfektion Hyg Med 4:127–129Google Scholar
  4. Brunton WA (1995) Infection and hospital laundry. Lancet 345(8964):1574Google Scholar
  5. Council Directive of 23 October (2000) Establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy (2000/60/EC). Off J Eur Communities L327Google Scholar
  6. Desinfektionsmittel-Liste des VAH (2009) Mhp-Verlag: Deutschen Gesellschaft für Hygiene und Mikrobiologie. http://www.dghm.org/red/komissionen/desinfekt/index.html?TextID=242. Accessed 5 May 2010
  7. Emmanuel E, Keck G, Blanchard JM, Vermande P, Perrodin Y (2004) Toxicological effects of disinfections using sodium hypochlorite on aquatic organisms and its contribution to AOX formation in hospital wastewater. Environ Int 30(7):891–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fijan S, Šostar-Turk S, Cencič A (2005) Implementing hygiene monitoring systems in hospital laundries in order to reduce microbial contamination of hospital textiles. J Hosp Infect 61(1):30–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fijan S, Koren S, Cencič A, Šostar-Turk S (2007a) Antimicrobial disinfection effect of a laundering procedure for hospital textiles against various indicator bacteria and fungi using different substrates for simulating human excrements. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 57(3):251–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fijan S, Šostar-Turk S, Neral B, Pušić T (2007b) The influence of industrial laundering of hospital textiles on the properties of cotton fabrics. Text Res J 77(4):247–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fijan S, Fijan R, Šostar-Turk S (2008) Implementing sustainable laundering procedures for textiles in a commercial laundry and thus decreasing wastewater burden. J Cleaner Prod 16(12):1258–1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garcia MT, Campos E, Marsal A, Ribosa I (2009) Biodegradability and toxicity of sulphonate-based surfactants in aerobic and anaerobic aquatic environments. Water Res 43(2):295–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gebel J, Werner HP, Kirsch-Altena A, Bansemir K (2002) Standard Methoden der DGHM zur Prüfung chemischer Desinfektionsverfahren. Mhp Verlag GmbH, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  14. Gellert GA, Waterman SH, Ewert D, Oshiro L, Giles MP, Monroe SS et al (1990) An outbreak of acute gastroenteritis caused by a small round structured virus in a geriatric convalescent facility. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 11(9):459–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gonzaga AJ, Mortimer EA, Wolinsky E (1964) Transmission of Staphylococci by fomities. JAMA 189:711–715Google Scholar
  16. Griesser R (1994) Assessment of whiteness and tint deviation of fluorescent substrates with good instrument correlation, colour research and application. Ciba-Geigy, Basle, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  17. Guidelines of the Robert-Koch Institute (1995) Guidelines for hospital hygiene and infection prevention. Robert-Koch Institute, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  18. Karahan O (2010) Inhibition of linear alkylbenzene sulphonates on the biodegradation mechanisms of activated sludge. Bioresour Technol 101(1):92–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kirby WMM, Corporon DO, Tanner DC (1956) Urinary tract infections caused by antibiotic-resistant Coliform bacteria. JAMA 162:1–4Google Scholar
  20. Kitis M (2003) Disinfection of wastewater with peracetic acid: a review. Environ Int 30(1):47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leonardo da Vinci project, number: 146 360 (2010) Training modules on the sustainability of industrial laundering processes. E-learning tool for trainees and employees in laundries. http://www.laundry-sustainability.eu/. Accessed 5 May 2010
  22. Liste der vom Robert Koch-Institut geprüften und anerkannten Desinfektionsmittel und – verfahren (Eng. List of the Robert Koch institute tested and approved disinfectants and procedures) (2007) Robert-Koch Institute, Bundesgesundheitsbl - Gesundheitsforsch – Gesund­heitsschutz. Springer Medizin Verlag 50:1335–1356. doi: 10.1007/s00103-007-0341-4Google Scholar
  23. Lynch M, Stretsky PB (2003) The meaning of green: contrasting criminological perspectives. Theor Criminol 7(2):217–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oliphant JW, Gordon DA, Meis A, Parker R (1949) Q-fever in laundry workers, presumably transmitted from contaminated clothing. Am J Hyg 47:76–81Google Scholar
  25. RAL-GZ 992 (2001) Sachegemëße Waschepflege, Gütezicherung RAL-GZ 992 (Eng. Proper linen care, quality assurance RAL-GZ 992). RAL, Deutsches Institut für Gütezicherung und Kennzeichnung e.V, Sankt AvgustinGoogle Scholar
  26. Shah PC, Krajden S, Kane J, Summerbell RC (1988) Tinea Corporis caused by Microsporum canis: report of a nosocomial outbreak. Eur J Epidemiol 4(1):33–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Šostar Turk S, Petrinić I, Simonič M (2005) Laundry wastewater treatment using coagulation and membrane filtration. Resour Conserv Recycl 44(2):185–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Standaert SM, Hutcheson RH, Schaffner WA (1994) Nosocomial transmission of salmonella gastroenteritis to laundry workers in a nursing home. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 15(1):22–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Thomas MD, Giedinghagen DH, Hoff GL (1987) An outbreak of scabies among employees in a hospital-associated commercial laundry. Infect Control 8:427–429Google Scholar
  30. Uredba o emisiji snovi pri odvajanju odpadne vode iz naprav za pranje in kemično čiščenje tekstilij (2007) (Eng. Regulation on the substance emission during the removal of wastewater from laundries and dry cleaners). Uradni list Republike Slovenije, št. 41/2007Google Scholar
  31. Wilcox MH, Jones BL (1995) Enterococci and hospital laundry. Lancet 345:1574–1575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ying GG (2006) Fate, behaviour and effects of surfactants and their degradation products in the environment. Environ Int 32(3):417–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Health ScienceUniversity of MariborMariborSlovenia
  2. 2.Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of MariborMariborSlovenia

Personalised recommendations