Corrosion Study of API 5L X60 Gas Pipelines Steels in NS4 Simulated Soil

Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC, volume 1)


External corrosion and cracking are the major threats and the principal mechanisms of buried pipelines deterioration. Indeed they reduce the structural integrity of the transmission system of gas pipelines. Investigations carried out on GZ1 site line, in Algeria, after about 30 years of exploitation under high pressure revealed that under certain conditions the not protected surfaces in contact with the ground developed many failures by corrosion and cracking: coating failure, reductions in thickness, pitting, etc. In this study the methodology was defined initially, by an expertise of the characteristic parameters of working GZ1 line which broke due to external corrosion, and then a simulation, in laboratory, of the conditions and the corrosion damage mechanisms. We were particularly interested in the corrosive electrolytic medium choice because it can simulate NS4 soil solution and the protection system by using corrosion inhibitors containing polyphosphates. Results showed that the corrosion potential is slightly moved towards the anodic values, when the pH of soil solution tends to a light acidity. This shift goes with a clear reduction of anodic and cathodic current densities and the polarization resistance Rp decreases. In the explored temperature range and simulating soil, corrosion current density increases with temperature increase. The corrosion activation energy increases with temperature according to the soil environment. Nyquist diagrams present the same general form for corrosion according to the slightly neutral pH for various immersion times in the steel/test solution interface.


Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy Steel Surface Corrosion Potential Polarization Resistance Corrosion Current Density 


  1. 1.
    C.W. Petersen, K.T. Corbett, Presented at the International pipeline technology conference, Ostend, 9–13 May 2004, pp. 3–20Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sonatrach Gas Marketing & International Development, Yearly Gas newsmagazine published by Sonatrach - Marketing Activity, Alger, Dec 2004,
  3. 3.
    A. Benmoussat, M. Hadjel, Rapport d’expertise des tubes STT, Projet de recherche CNEPRU J 1301-03-05-98, FSI, Université de Tlemcen, Algérie, 1999Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D.X. He, W. Chen, J.L. Luo, Corrosion 60, 778 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Y.S. Choi, J.-G. Kim, Corrosion 61, 293 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M.C. Li, Z. Han, H.C. Lin, C.N. Cao, Corrosion 57, 913 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    API specification 5L (SPEC 5L), Specification for Line Pipe, 14th edn. (Washington, 1992)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. Jung, A. Pineau, Résistance et ténacité des aciers pour gazoducs. Cas de l'arrêt des fissures en rupture par clivage Revue de Métallurgie-CIT/Science et génie des matériaux, (Fev.1995), pp. 227–239, An International Journal of metallurgy Published by EDP SciencesGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R.N. Parkins, W.K. Blanchard, B.S. Delanty, Corrosion 50, 394 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. Bentiss, M. Lagrenee, M. Traisnell, J.C. Hormez, Corrosion 55, 968 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R.A. King, TRRL Supplementary Report 316, TTRL Crowthone, 1977Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Corrosion Research Equip of LAEPO LaboratoryAbou Bekr Belkaid University of TlemcenTlemcenAlgeria
  2. 2.Unité de Matériaux Et Transformations (UMET) (UMR-CNRS 8207)Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Lille, ENSCLVilleneuve d’Ascq CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations