Advertisement

Wetlands pp 115-128 | Cite as

Ecological Functions of Wetlands

  • John A. Nyman
Chapter

Abstract

We use the term “function” to mean processes or manifestations of processes. Wetlands probably have hundreds of functions, but only a small number are considered important to most people. Some values are based on aesthetics, such as beauty and naturalness, but many are economic, such as water quality improvement, wildlife hunting lease value, and sustainable timber production. Some of the values are considered to be negative, such as supporting mosquito populations. We classify functions as those that generally are captured by the landowner versus those that generally are external to the landowner to illuminate the fact that most of the economic value of most wetlands is external to the landowner.

Keywords

Coastal Wetland Coarse Woody Debris Wetland Plant Water Quality Improvement Forested Wetland 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bellrose FC (1980) Ducks, Geese, and Swans of North America, 3rd edn. Wildlife Management Institute. Stakepole Books, Harrrisburg, p 540Google Scholar
  2. Boesch DF, Josselyn MN, Mehta AJ, Morris JT, Nuttle WK, Simenstad CA, Swift D (1994) Scientific assessment of coastal wetland loss, restoration and management in Louisiana. J Coastal Res (Special Issue) 20:1–103Google Scholar
  3. Bolen EG, Robinson WL (2003) Wildlife ecology and management, 5th edn. Benjamin Cummings, New Jersey, p 634Google Scholar
  4. Brashares JS, Arcese P, Sam MK, Coppolillo PB, Sinclair ARE, Balmford A (2004) Bushmeat hunting, wildlife declines, and fish supply in West Africa. Science 306:1180–1183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brinson MM (2011) Classification of wetlands. In: LePage BA (ed) Wetlands—integrating multidisciplinary concepts. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  6. Brinson MM, Rheinhardt R (1996) The role of reference wetlands in functional assessment and mitigation. Ecol Appl 6:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Byrne J, Hughes K, Rickerson W, Kurgelashvili L (2007) American policy conflict in the greenhouse: divergent trends in federal, regional, state, and local green energy and climate change policy. Energy Policy 35:4555–4573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caudill J, Henderson E (2005) Banking on nature 2004: the economic benefit to local communities of National Wildlife Refuge visitation. Division of Economics, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington DC, p 435Google Scholar
  9. Chabreck RH, Nyman JA (2005) Managing coastal wetlands for wildlife. In: Braun CE (ed) Techniques for wildlife investigations and management. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, pp 839–860Google Scholar
  10. Cleary J, Roulet NT, Moore TR (2005) Greenhouse gas emissions from Canadian peat extraction, 1990–2000: a life-cycle analysis. Ambio 34:456–461PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Connelly JW, Gammonley JH, Peek JM (2005) Harvest management. In: Braun CE (ed) Techniques for wildlife investigations and management. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, pp 658–690Google Scholar
  12. Coveney MF, Stites DL, Lowe EF, Battoe LE, Conrow R (2002) Nutrient removal from eutrophic lake water by wetland filtration. Ecol Eng 19:141–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deegan LA, Peterson BJ, Potier R (1990) Stable isotopes and cellulase activity as evidence for detritus as a food source for juvenile Gulf menhaden. Estuaries 13:14–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fairbairn SE, Dinsmore JJ (2001) Local and landscape-level influences on wetland bird communities of the prairie pothole region of Iowa, USA. Wetlands 21:41–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Faulkner SP, Chambers JL, Conner WH, Keim RF, Day JW, Gardiner ES, Hughes MS, King SL, McLeod KW, Miller CA, Nyman JA, Shaffer GP (2007) Conservation and use of coastal wetland forests in Louisiana. In: Conner WH, Doyle TW, Krauss KW (eds) The ecology of tidal freshwater swamps of the southeastern United States. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 447–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Franklin HB (2007) The most important fish in the sea: menhaden and America. Island Press, Washington, p 265Google Scholar
  17. Gibbs JP (1993) Importance of small wetland for the persistence of local populations of wetland-associated animals. Wetlands 13:25–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gowdy J, O’Hara S (1995) Economic theory for environmentalists. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, p 192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hames R (2007) The ecologically noble savage debate. Annu Rev Anthropol 36:177–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ingraham MW, Foster SG (2008) The value of ecosystem services provided by the U.S. National Refuge System in the contiguous U.S. Ecol Econ 67:608–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kadlec RH, Knight RK (1996) Treatment wetlands. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 893Google Scholar
  22. Kanouse S, La Peyre MK, Nyman JA (2006) Nekton use of Ruppia maritima and non-vegetated bottom habitat types within brackish marsh ponds. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 327:61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kearney MS, Stevenson JC (1991) Island land loss and marsh vertical accretion rate evidence for historical sea level changes in Chesapeake Bay. J Coast Res 7:403–415Google Scholar
  24. Kellerman KF (1911) Nitrogen gathering plants. In: Arnold JA (ed) Yearbook of the United States Department of Agriculture 1910. Kessinger Publishing, Washington, pp 213–218Google Scholar
  25. Kemp WM, Boynton WR, Adolf JE, Boesch DF, Boicourt WC, Brush G, Cornwell JC, Fisher TR, Glibert PM, Hagy JD, Harding LW, Houde ED, Kimmel DG, Miller WD, Newell RIE, Roman MR, Smith EM, Stevenson JC (2005) Eutrophication of Chesapeake Bay: historical trends and ecological interactions. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 303:1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Laubhan MK, King SL, Fredrickson LH (2005) Managing inland wetlands for wildlife. In: Braun CE (ed) Techniques for wildlife investigations and management, 6th edn. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, pp 797–838Google Scholar
  27. Loehle C, Wigley TB, Schilling E, Tatum V, Beebe J, Vance E, van Deusen P, Weatherford P (2009) Achieving conservation goals in managed forests of the southeastern coastal plain. Environ Manag 44:1136–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry (n.d.) Recommended forestry best management practices for Louisiana. Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, p 84Google Scholar
  29. Lower Mississippi Valley Joint Venture Forest Resource Conservation Working Group (2007) Restoration, management, and monitoring of forest resources in the Mississippi alluvial valley: recommendations for enhancing wildlife habitat. In: Wilson R, Ribbeck K, King S, Twedt D (eds). Lower Mississippi Valley Joint Venture Office, Vicksburg, p 96Google Scholar
  30. Maltby E (2009) Functional assessment of wetlands: towards evaluation of ecosystem services. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2000) Wetlands, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York, p 920Google Scholar
  32. Morris JT, Kjerfve B, Dean JM (1990) Dependence of estuarine productivity on anomalies in mean sea level. Limnol Oceanogr 35:926–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. National Research Council (1992) Restoration of aquatic ecosystems: science, technology, and public policy. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences. National Academy Press, Washington, p 576Google Scholar
  34. National Research Council (1995) Wetlands: characteristics and boundaries. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences. National Academy Press, Washington, p 328Google Scholar
  35. O’Connell JL, Nyman JA (2010) Marsh terraces in coastal Louisiana increase marsh edge and densities of waterbirds. Wetlands 30:125–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Organ J, Mahoney S (2007) The future of public trust. Wildl Prof 1:18–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rabalais NN, Turner RE, Wiseman WJ Jr (2002) Gulf of Mexico hypoxia, a.k.a. “the dead zone”. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:235–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Reddy KR, Patrick WH Jr, Lindau CW (1989) Nitrification-denitrification at the plant root-sediment interface in wetlands. Limnol Oceanogr 34:1004–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Seitzinger S (1994) Linkages between organic matter mineralization and denitrification in eight riparian wetlands. Biogeochemistry 25:19–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Seitzinger SP, Harrison JA, Bohlke JK, Bouwman AF, Lowrance R, Peterson B, Tobias C, Van Drecht G (2006) Denitrification across landscapes and waterscapes: a synthesis. Ecol Appl 16:2064–2090PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith V (2003) Eutrophication of freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems a global phenomena. Environ Sci Pollut Res 10:126–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Steadman DW (1995) Prehistoric extinctions of pacific island birds—biodiversity meets zooarchaeology. Science 267:1123–1131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Steadman DW, Martin PS, MacPhee RDE, Jull AJT, McDonald HG, Woods CA, Iturralde-Vinent M, Hodgins GWL (2005) Asynchronous extinction of later quaternary sloths on continents and islands. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102:11763–11768PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stein ED, Brinson M, Rains MC, Lleindl W, Hauer FR (2010) Wetland assessment alphabet soup: how to choose (or not choose) the right assessment method. Wetl Sci Pract 26:20–24Google Scholar
  45. Stiner MC (2001) Thirty years on the “Broad Spectrum Revolution” and paleolithic demography. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98:6993–6996PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thullen JS, Sartoris JJ, Nelson SM (2005) Managing vegetation in surface-flow wastewater-treatment wetlands for optimal treatment performance. Ecol Eng 25:583–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Whigham DF, Jordan TE (2003) Isolated wetlands and water quality. Wetlands 15:541–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Renewable Natural ResourcesLouisiana State University Agricultural CenterBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations