Wetlands pp 205-221 | Cite as

Managing Wetlands for Multifunctional Benefits

Chapter

Abstract

Humans have sought to manage and exploit wetlands from the beginning of recorded history. From the early modifications of the marshlands of Mesopotamia to the draining of the English Fens, the management of wetlands has always reflected the major societal and economic drivers of the times. Early efforts at conservation management focussed primarily on waterbirds, but over the latter part of the twentieth Century there has been a shift of emphasis towards towards ‘wise use’ and an understanding of how ecosystem processes and functions deliver important benefits to human society. The recognition that the natural environment provides societal benefits is crucial to the future conservation of wetlands. Building on the Ecosystem Approach, the adoption of a multidisciplinary approach to the management of wetlands, which extends beyond biological and hydrological regimes into social and economic science, is considered essential if improved decision-making is to be achieved in order to deliver multifuncitonal benefits from wetland management.

Keywords

Ecosystem Service Wetland Loss Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystem Approach Before Present 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Acreman MC, Fisher J, Stratford CJ, Mould DJ, Mountford JO (2007) Hydrological science and wetland restoration: some case studies from Europe. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11:158–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Algaze G (2008) Ancient Mesopotamia at the dawn of civilization: the evolution of an urban landscape. Chicago University Press, Chicago, p 246Google Scholar
  3. Apitz SE, Elliot M, Fountain M, Galloway TS (2006) European environmental management: moving to an ecosystem approach. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2:80–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beaumont NJ, Austen MC, Atkins JP, Burdon D, Degraer S, Dentinho TP, Derous S, Holm P, Horton T, van Ierland E (2007) Identification, definition and quantification of goods and services provided by marine biodiversity: implications for the ecosystem approach. Mar Pollut Bull 54:253–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benstead P (2000) Practical wetland restoration: some recent experiences of the Royal Society for the protection of birds. Landscape Res 25:394–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bezemer KWL (1974) The international council for bird preservation. Het Vogeljaar 22:611Google Scholar
  7. Bowley A (2007) The great fen—a waterland for the future. Br Wildl 18:415–423Google Scholar
  8. Boyer T, Polasky S (2004) Valuing urban wetlands: a review of non-market valuation studies. Wetlands 24:744–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brinson MM (2011) Classification of wetlands. In: LePage BA (ed) Wetlands—integrating multidisciplinary concepts. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  10. Carp E (1980) A directory of wetlands of international importance in the western Palearctic wetlands. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) and United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Gland, Switzerland, p 506Google Scholar
  11. Carty A, Scholz M, Heal K, Gouriveau F, Mustafa A (2008) The universal design, operation and maintenance guidelines for Farm Constructed Wetlands (FCW) in temperate climates. Bioresour Technol 99:6780–6792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coast E (2002) Demography of the Marsh Arabs. In: Nicholson E, Clark P (eds) The Iraqi marshlands: a human and environmental study. Politico’s, London, pp 19–35Google Scholar
  13. Commission of the European Communities (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the council establishing a framework for the community action in the field of water policy. http://www.tematea.org/?q=node/1312&PHPSESSID=d324807c78b71c5ec5c6299c28f56d0a
  14. Convention on Biological Diversity (2010) Operational guidance for application of the ecosystem approach. http://www.cbd.int/ecosystem/operational.shtml. Accessed 18 May 2010
  15. Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, Van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:252–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crooks S, Turner RK, Pethig JS, Parry ML (2001) Managing catchment-coastal floodplains: the need for a UK water and wetlands policy. Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE) Working Paper PA 01-01, University of East Anglia, Norwich, p 21Google Scholar
  17. Dahl TE, Alford GJ (1996) History of wetlands in the conterminous United States. United States Geological Survey, Water-Supply Paper 2425:19–26Google Scholar
  18. Dale VH, Brown S, Haeuber RA, Hobbs NT, Huntly N, Naiman RJ, Riebsame WE, Turner MG, Valone TJ (2000) Ecological principles and guidelines for managing the use of land. Ecol Appl 10:639–670Google Scholar
  19. Davidson NC, Evans PR (1987) Habitat restoration and creation: its role and potential in the conservation of waders. Wader Study Group Bulletin 49, Supplement/IWRB Special Publication 7:139–145Google Scholar
  20. Denham TP, Haberle SG, Lentfer C, Fullagar R, Field J, Therin M, Porch N, Winsborough B (2003) Origins of agriculture at Kuk Swamp in the highlands of New Guinea. Science 301:189–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dickson W (1978) Some effects of the acidification of Swedish lakes. Verhandlungen Internationalen Vereinigung Theoretische Angewandte Limnologie 20:851–856Google Scholar
  22. Erickson RE (1979) Federal programs influencing wetlands. Seventh Annual Michigan Landuse Policy Conference, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, p 246Google Scholar
  23. Euliss NH Jr, Smith LM, Wilcox DA, Browne AB (2008) Linking ecosystem processes with wetland management goals: charting a course for a sustainable future. Wetlands 28:553–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Frayer WE, Monahan TJ, Bowden DC, Graybill FA (1983) Status and trends of wetlands and deepwater habitats in the conterminous United States, 1950s to 1970s. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, p 31Google Scholar
  25. Gardner RC, Davidson NC (2011) The Ramsar convention. In: LePage BA (ed) Wetlands—integrating multidisciplinary concepts. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  26. Gilbert G, Tyler GA, Dunn CJ, Smith KJ (2005) Nesting habitat selection by bitterns Botaurus stellaris in Britain and the implications for wetland management. Biol Conserv 124:547–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. de Groot RS (1992) Functions of nature: evaluation of nature in environmental planning, management and decision-making. Wolters Noordhoff BV, Groningen, p 345Google Scholar
  28. de Groot RS, Stuip MAM, Finlayson CM, Davidson N (2006) Valuing wetlands: guidance for valuing the benefits derived from wetland ecosystem services. Ramsar Technical Report No. 3/CBD Technical Series No. 27. Ramsar Convention Secretariat, Gland, p 46Google Scholar
  29. Gunderson LH, Holling CS (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, p 508Google Scholar
  30. Hahn T, Olsson P, Folke C, Johansson K (2006) Trust-building, knowledge generation and organizational innovations: the role of a bridging organization for adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape around Kristianstad, Sweden. Hum Ecol 34:573–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Haines-Young R, Potschin M (2007) The ecosystem concept and identification of ecosystem goods and services in english policy context. Review Paper to Defra, London, UK. Project code NR0107, p 21Google Scholar
  32. Hansson L-A, Broenmark C, Nilsson PA, Aabjoernsson K (2005) Conflicting demands on wetland ecosystem services: nutrient retention, biodiversity or both? Freshw Biol 50:705–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Harrington R, McInnes RJ (2009) Integrated Constructed Wetlands (ICW) for livestock wastewater management. Bioresour Technol 100:5498–5505PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harrington R, Ryder C (2002) The use of integrated constructed wetlands in the management of farmyard runoff and waste water. In: Proceeding of the National Hydrology Seminar on Water Resources Management Sustainable Supply and Demand. The Irish National Committees of the IHP (International Hydrological Programme) and ICID (International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage), Tullamore, pp 55–63Google Scholar
  35. Harrington R, Dunne EJ, Carroll P, Keohane J, Ryder C (2005) The concept, design and performance of integrated constructed wetlands for the treatment of farmyard dirty water. In: Dunne EJ, Reddy KR, Carton OT (eds) Nutrient management in agricultural watersheds: a wetlands solution. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, pp 179–188Google Scholar
  36. Harris LE (1953) Vermuyden and the fens. Cleaver Hume Press, London, p 168Google Scholar
  37. Jackson JBC, Kirby MX, Berger WH, Bjorndal KA, Botsford LW, Bourque BJ, Bradbury RH, Cooke R, Erlandson J, Estes JA, Hughes TP, Kidwell S, Lange CB, Lenihan HS, Pandolfi JM, Peterson CH, Steneck RS, Tegner MJ, Warner RR (2001) Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293:629–638PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kaplan R (2011) Acknowledging and benefitting from multiple perspectives. In: LePage BA (ed) Wetlands—integrating multidisciplinary concepts. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  39. Korsman T (1999) Temporal and spatial trends of lake acidity in northern Sweden. J Paleolimnol 22:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kusler JA (1983) Our national wetland heritage—a protection guidebook. Environmental Law Institute, Washington, p 4Google Scholar
  41. Laffoley D d’A, Maltby E, Vincent MA, Mee L, Dunn E, Gilliland P, Hamer JP, Mortimer D, Pound D (2004) The ecosystem approach. Coherent actions for marine and coastal environments. A Report to the UK Government. English Nature, Peterborough, p 65Google Scholar
  42. LePage BA (2011) Wetlands: a multidisciplinary perspective. In: LePage BA (ed) Wetlands—integrating multidisciplinary concepts. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  43. Maltby E (1986) Waterlogged wealth: why waste the world’s wet places. Earthscan, London, p 200Google Scholar
  44. Maltby E (2009a) The changing wetland paradigm. In: Maltby E, Barker T (eds) The wetlands handbook. Blackwell, West Sussex, p 800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Maltby E (2009b) Functional assessment of wetlands: towards a valuation of ecosystem services. Woodhead Publishing, Oxford, p 712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Maltby E, Hogan DV, McInnes RJ (1996) Functional analysis of european wetland ecosystems—phase I (FAEWE): the functioning of river marginal wetland ecosystems—improving the science base for the development of procedures of functional analysis. Final Report EC DG XII CT90-0084. EUR 16132. Office of the Official Publications of European Communities, Brussels, Belgium, p 448Google Scholar
  47. McInnes RJ (2007) Integrating ecosystem services within a 50-year vision for wetlands. Unpublished WWT Report to the England Wetland Vision Partnership, Slimbridge, p 34Google Scholar
  48. McInnes RJ (2008) Why wetlands matter to people. Environ Sci 17:6–9Google Scholar
  49. McInnes RJ, Maltby E, Neuber MS, Rostron CP (1998) Functional analysis: transforming expert knowledge into a practical management tool. In: McCabe AJ, Davis JA (eds) Wetlands for the future. Gleneagles Publishing, Adelaide, pp 407–429Google Scholar
  50. Middleton B (2011) Multidisciplinary approaches to climate change questions. In: LePage BA (ed) Wetlands—integrating multidisciplinary concepts. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  51. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: wetlands and water synthesis: a report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. World Resources Institute, Washington, p 68Google Scholar
  52. Minich N (2011) The role of landscape architects and wetlands. In: LePage BA (ed) Wetlands—integrating multidisciplinary concepts. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  53. Mitlin D, Thompson J (1995) Participatory approaches in urban areas: strengthening civil society or reinforcing the status quo? Environ Urban 7:231–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Morris J, Gowing DJG, Mills J, Dunderdale JAL (2000) Reconciling agricultural economic and environmental objectives: the case of recreating wetlands in the Fenland area of eastern England. Agric Ecosyst Environ 79:245–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, Polasky S, Tallis H, Cameron DR, Chan KMA, Daily GC, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Lonsdorf E, Naidoo R, Ricketts TH, Shaw MR (2009) Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ 7:4–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nyman JA (2011) Ecological functions of wetlands. In: LePage BA (ed) Wetlands—integrating multidisciplinary concepts. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  57. Office of Technology Assessment (1984) Wetlands—their use and regulation, OTA-O-206. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, p 208Google Scholar
  58. Olsson P, Folke C (2001) Local ecological knowledge and institutional dynamics for ecosystem management: a study of Lake Racken Watershed, Sweden. Ecosystems 4:85–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Olsson P, Folke C, Berkes F (2004) Adaptive co-management for building resilience in social–ecological systems. Environ Manage 34:75–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pound D (2009) The eco what approach? ECOS 30:17–27Google Scholar
  61. Richardson CJ, Hussain NA (2006) Restoring the Garden of Eden: an ecological assessment of the marshes of Iraq. BioScience 56:477–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Richardson CJ, Reiss P, Hussain NA, Alwash AJ, Pool DJ (2005) The restoration potential of the Mesopotamian marshes of Iraq. Science 307:1307–1311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Robertson MM (2004) The neoliberalization of ecosystem services: wetland mitigation banking and problems in environmental governance. Geoforum 35:361–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Salyer JC II, Gillet FG (1964) Federal refuges. In: Linduska JP (ed) Waterfowl tomorrow. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, pp 497–508Google Scholar
  65. Scholz M, Harrington R, Carroll P, Mustafa A (2007) The Integrated Constructed Wetlands (ICW) concept. Wetlands 27:337–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sergio F, Pedrini P, Marchesi L (2003) Reconciling the dichotomy between single species and ecosystem conservation: black kites (Milvus migrans) and eutrophication in pre-Alpine lakes. Biol Conserv 110:101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Shepherd G (2004) The ecosystem approach: five steps to implementation. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland, p 30Google Scholar
  68. Springate-Baginski O, Allen D, Darwall WRT (2009) An integrated wetland assessment toolkit: a guide to good practice. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland, p 144Google Scholar
  69. Thesiger W (1964) The marsh arabs. Penguin Classics, London, p 256Google Scholar
  70. Turner RK, van den Bergh JCJM, Söderqvist T, Barendregt A, van der Straaten J, Maltby E, van Ierland EC (2000) Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands: scientific integration for management and policy. Ecol Econ 35:7–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Turner RK, van den Bergh JCJM, Brouwer R (2003) Introduction. In: Turner RK, van den Bergh JCJM, Brouwer R (eds) Managing wetlands: an ecological economics approach. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  72. United States Congress Public Law (1954) Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act. US Congress PL566, August 4, 1954, 68 Stat 666Google Scholar
  73. Vira B, Adams WM (2009) Ecosystem services and conservation strategy: beware the silver bullet. Conserv Lett 2:158–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Walker B, Carpenter SR, Anderies J, Abel N, Cumming GS, Janssen M, Lebel L, Norberg J, Peterson GD, Pritchard R (2002) Resilience management in social–ecological systems: a working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Conservation Ecology 6:14 [online]. www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art14 Google Scholar
  75. Wood A, van Halsema GE (2008) Scoping agriculture-wetlands interactions towards a sustainable multiple-response strategy. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Water Report No. 33. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, p 155Google Scholar
  76. Young G (1977) Return to the marshes: life with the marsh Arabs of Iraq. Collins, London, p 224Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bioscan (UK) LtdOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations