Organic Fertilizer Use in Northeastern Thailand: An Analysis of Some Factors Affecting Farmers’ Attitudes

Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

The transition to environmentally friendly farming practices and products has recently become popular among farmers and consumers throughout the world. Organic farming using natural fertilizers has gained acceptance albeit slowly in many developing countries due to some socio-economic constraints. This study therefore investigated the opinions and attitudes of jasmine rice farmers in Surin province, northeastern Thailand towards the use of organic fertilizers in their farms. Information was collected from 100 rice farmers whose socio-economic profiles and attitudes were determined through interviews and the use of the Likert’s scale, respectively. Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) statistics was employed to correlate the two variables. Among the variables measured, age of farmers, educational attainment, and degree of extension worker contact were found to be strongly correlated with positive attitudes towards the use of organic fertilizers at the 5% level. It can be concluded that adoption of organic farming practices among the respondents is closely associated with the availability and access to information about organic fertilizers as well as farmers’ perceived maturity with age. For the promotion of organic fertilizer use, there must be a more intensive information campaign using all available possible means.

Keywords

Field Survey Manure Rice Cultivation Socio-Economic Sustainable Agriculture Surin Province 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all rice farmers in Surin province, Thailand, who participated in the interview. We also would like to express our deepest thanks and appreciation to Dr. Lawrence M. Liao, visiting professor, Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University, Japan, for his academic suggestions and special thanks as well go to the Thai Royal Government for granting the scholarship to the first author to enable him to conduct this research.

References

  1. Anon (1997) Product choices help add to worm counts. Farm Industry News, February, p 64Google Scholar
  2. Antarikanon P (2000) Bio-organic research and development, organic fertilizer and waste material from agro industry. Thailand Institute of Scientific and Technological Research (TISTR), Bangkok (in Thai)Google Scholar
  3. Cao S, Xu C, Chen L, Wang X (2009) Attitudes of farmers in China’s Northern Shaanxi province towards the land-use changes required under the Grain for Green Project, and implications for the project’s success. Land Use Policy 26:1182–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chouichom S, Yamao M (2010) Comparing opinions and attitudes of organic and non-organic farmers towards organic farming systems in northeastern Thailand. J Organic Syst 5(1):25–35Google Scholar
  5. Edwards CA, Bohlen PL (1996) Biology and ecology of earthworms. Chapman and Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. IFDC (2008) World fertilizer prices soar as food and fuel economics merge. IFDC Newsletter 19 Feb 2008. http://ifdc.org/New_Layout/News_PressReleases/index.html. Accessed 15 May 2008
  7. Kaliba RMA, Verkuijl H, Mwangi W (2000) Factors affecting adoption of improved maize seeds and use of inorganic fertilizer for maize production in the intermediate and lowland zones of Tanzania. J Agric Appl Econ 32:35–47Google Scholar
  8. Lobley M, Butler A, Reed M (2009) The contribution of organic farming to rural development: an exploration of the socio-economic linkages of organic and non-organic farms in England. Land Use Policy 2:723–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Manlay R, Filler C, Swift MJ (2007) Historical evolution of soil organic matter concepts and their relationships with the fertility and sustainability of cropping system. Agric Ecosyst Environ 199:217–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mazvimavi K, Twomlow S (2009) Socioeconomic and institutional factors influencing adoption of conservation farming by vulnerable households in Zimbabwe. J Agric Syst 101:20–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McGuiness H (1993) Living soil: sustainable alternatives to chemical fertilizers for developing countries. Consumers Policy Institute, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. National News Bureau of Thailand (2003) http://thainews.prd.go.th/en/news.php?id = 254611080011. Accessed 30 June 2009
  13. Nyamangara J, Gotosa J, Mpofu SE (2001) Cattle manure effects on structural stability and water retention capacity of granitic sandy soil in Zimbabwe. Soil Tillage Res 64:157–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. OAE (Office of Agricultural Economics) (2008) http://www.oae.go.th. Accessed 01 July 2009
  15. Odhiambo JJO, Magandini NV (2008) An assessment of the use of mineral and organic fertilizers by smallholder farmers in Vhembe district, Limpopo province, South Africa. Afr J Agric Res 3:357–362Google Scholar
  16. Ouma JO, Murithi FM, Mwangi W, Verkuijl H, Gethi M, De Groote H (2002) Adoption of maize seed and fertilizer technology in Embu District, Kenya. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Mexico CityGoogle Scholar
  17. Reft D (1990) Organic fertilizer. www.ext.vt.edu/departments/envirohort/factsheet2/fertilizer/jan89pr6.html. Accessed 23 April 2009
  18. Sartsanarakgij S (2009) Production and workshop model for high quality of organic fertilizer technology. Thailand Institute of Scientific and Technological Research (TISTR), Bangkok (in Thai)Google Scholar
  19. Siriphongsaroj K (1989) Analysis of economic factors affecting agricultural technology adoption of farmers: case study in Soybean. Thailand Institute of Scientific and Technological Research (TISTR), Bangkok (in Thai)Google Scholar
  20. SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) (2004) Statistical package for social sciences release 13.0. Prentice Hall, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  21. Teaumroong N (2005) Bio-organic fertilizer production. Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon-Ratchasima (in Thai)Google Scholar
  22. Wheeler SA (2008) What influences agricultural professionals’ views towards organic agriculture? Ecol Econ 65:145–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yamano T (2008) Dairy-banana integration and organic fertilizer use in Uganda. Discussion Paper 08-03. GRIPS Policy Information Center, TokyoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Bioresource Science, Laboratory of Food and Resource Economics, Graduate School of Biosphere ScienceHiroshima UniversityHigashi Hiroshima, HiroshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations