Advertisement

Native Fire Regimes and Landscape Resilience

  • Max A. MoritzEmail author
  • Paul F. Hessburg
  • Nicholas A. Povak
Chapter
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD)

Abstract

First introduced by Holling (1973), the term “resilience” has been used widely in the ecological literature, but it is not always defined and is rarely quantified. Holling suggested that ecological resilience is the amount of disturbance that an ecosystem could withstand without changing self-organized processes and structures. His description suggests that resilience may be: (1) represented by an observable set of properties; (2) defined by measures of degree; and (3) related to system states and their (in)tolerance to reshaping, and that some properties of resilience may be quantifiable. We also see the idea of fire resilience in the literature (e.g., MacGillivray and Grime 1995; He and Mladenoff 1999; Díaz-Delgado et al. 2002; Brown et al. 2004; Pausas et al. 2004), but this term has different meanings in diverse contexts.

Keywords

Fire Regime Fire Severity Fire Spread Large Fire Fire Size 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Agee, J.K. 1993. Fire ecology of Pacific Northwest forests. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arnold, B.C. 1983. Pareto distributions. Fairland: International Co-operative Publishing House.Google Scholar
  3. Bailey, R.G. 1995. Descriptions of the ecoregions of the United States. 2nd ed. Misc. Publ. No. 1391, Map scale 1:7,500,000, U.S. Forest Service.Google Scholar
  4. Bak, P. 1996. How nature works: The science of self-organized criticality. New York: Copernicus.Google Scholar
  5. Boer, M.M., R.J. Sadler, R.A. Bradstock, A.M. Gill, and P.F. Grierson. 2008. Spatial scale invariance of southern Australian forest fires mirrors the scaling behaviour of fire-driving weather events. Landscape Ecology 23: 899–913.Google Scholar
  6. Bond, W.J., and B.W. van Wilgen. 1996. Fire and plants. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bond, W.J., F.I. Woodward, and G.F. Midgley. 2005. The global distribution of ecosystems in a world without fire. The New Phytologist 165: 525–538.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, R.T., J.K. Agee, and J.F. Franklin. 2004. Forest restoration and fire: principles in the context of place. Conservation Biology 18: 903–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burroughs, S.M., and S.F. Tebbens. 2001. Upper-truncated power laws in natural systems. Pure and Applied Geophysics 158: 741–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carlson, J.M., and J. Doyle. 1999. Highly optimized tolerance: A mechanism for power laws in designed systems. Physical Review E 60: 1412–1427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carlson, J.M., and J. Doyle. 2000. Highly optimized tolerance: robustness and design in complex systems. Physical Review Letters 84: 2529–2532.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carlson, J.M., and J. Doyle. 2002. Complexity and robustness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 99(Suppl 1): 2538–2545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark, R.M., S.J.D. Cox, and G.M. Laslett. 1999. Geophysical Journal International 136: 357–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clauset, A., C. Shalizi, and M.E.J. Newman 2009. Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data. SIAM Review 51(4): 661–703.Google Scholar
  15. D’Antonio, C.M., and P.M. Vitousek. 1992. Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23: 63–87.Google Scholar
  16. Davis, F.W., and M.A. Moritz. 2001. Mechanisms of disturbance. In Encyclopedia of biodiversity, ed. S. Levin, 153–160. New York: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Díaz-Delgado, R., F. Lloret, X. Pons, and J. Terradas. 2002. Satellite evidence of decreasing resilience in Mediterranean plant communities after recurrent wildfires. Ecology 83: 2293–2303.Google Scholar
  18. Doyle, J., and J.M. Carlson. 2000. Power laws, highly optimized tolerance, and generalized source coding. Physical Review Letters 84: 5656–5659.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Falk, D.A., C. Miller, D. McKenzie, and A.E. Black. 2007. Cross-scale analysis of fire regimes. Ecosystems 10: 809–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Finney, M.A., R.C. Seli, C.W. McHugh, A.A. Ager, B. Bahro, and J.K. Agee. 2007. Simulation of long-term landscape-level fuel treatment effects on large wildfires. International Journal of Wildland Fire 16: 712–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gill, A.M. 1975. Fire and the Australian flora: a review. Australian Forestry 38: 4–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grimm, V., and C. Wissel. 1997. Babel, or the ecological stability discussions–an inventory and analysis of terminology and a guide for avoiding confusion. Oecologia 109: 323–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gunderson, L.H., and C.S. Holling. 2002. Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hann, W.J., J.L. Jones, M.G. Karl, P.F. Hessburg, R.E. Keane, D.G. Long, J.P. Menakis, C.H. McNicoll, S.G. Leonard, R.A. Gravenmier, and B.G. Smith. 1997. An assessment of landscape dynamics of the Basin. In An assessment of ecosystem components in the interior Columbia Basin and portions of the Klamath and Great Basins. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-405, tech. eds. T.M. Quigley and S.J. Arbelbide. Portland: U.S. Forest Service.Google Scholar
  25. He, H.S., and D.J. Mladenoff. 1999. Spatially explicit and stochastic simulation of forest-landscape fire disturbance and succession. Ecology 80: 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hergarten, S. 2002. Self-organized criticality in earth systems. Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Herrera, C.M. 1992. Historical effects and sorting processes as explanation for contemporary ecological patterns: character syndromes in mediterranean woody plants. The American Naturalist 140: 421–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hessburg, P.F., B.G. Smith, and R.B. Salter. 1999a. Detecting change in forest spatial patterns from reference conditions. Ecological Applications 9: 1232–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hessburg, P.F., B.G. Smith, and R.B. Salter. 1999b. Using natural variation estimates to detect ecologically important change in forest spatial patterns: A case study of the eastern Washington Cascades. Research Paper PNW-RP-514. Portland: U.S. Forest Service.Google Scholar
  30. Hessburg, P.F., J.K. Agee, and J.F. Franklin. 2005. Dry mixed conifer forests and wildland fires of the inland Northwest: contrasting the landscape ecology of the pre-settlement and modern eras. Forest Ecology and Management 211: 117–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hessl, A.E., D. McKenzie, and R. Schellhaas. 2004. Drought and Pacific decadal oscillation linked to fire occurrence in the inland Pacific Northwest. Ecological Applications 14: 425–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Heyerdahl, E.K., L.B. Brubaker, and J.K. Agee. 2002. Annual and decadal climate forcing of historical fire regimes in the interior Pacific Northwest, USA. Holocene 12: 597–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Holling, C.S. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Holling, C.S., and L.H. Gunderson. 2002. Resilience and adaptive cycles. In Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems, eds. C.S. Holling and L.H. Gunderson, 25–62. Washington: Island Books.Google Scholar
  35. Johnson, E.A., and S.L. Gutsell. 1994. Fire frequency models, methods and interpretations. Advances in Ecological Research 25: 239–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kauffman, S.A. 1993. The origins of order: self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Krawchuk, M.A., M.A. Moritz, M.A. Parisien, J. Van Dorn, and K. Hayhoe. 2009. Global pyrogeography: the current and future distribution of wildfire. PLoS ONE 4(4), e5102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005102.
  38. Landres, P., P. Morgan, and F. Swanson. 1999. Overview of the use of natural variability in managing ecological systems. Ecological Applications 9: 1279–1288.Google Scholar
  39. Levin, S.A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73: 1943–1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. MacGillivray, C.W., and J.P. Grime. 1995. Testing predictions of the resistance and resilience of vegetation subjected to extreme events. Functional Ecology 9: 640–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Malamud, B.D., G. Morein, and D.L. Turcotte. 1998. Forest fires: an example of self-organized critical behavior. Science 281: 1840–1842.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Malamud, B.D., and D.L. Turcotte. 2006. The applicability of power law frequency statistics to floods. Journal of Hydrology 322: 168–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Malamud, B.D., J.D.A. Millington, and G.L.W. Perry. 2004. Characterizing wildfire regimes in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102: 4694–4699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Martin, R.E., and D.B. Sapsis. 1992. Fires as agents of biodiversity: pyrodiversity promotes biodiversity. In Proceedings of the symposium on biodiversity of northwestern California. Santa Rosa, ed. H.M. Herner, 28–31. Berkeley: University of California Center for Wildland Resources Report 29.Google Scholar
  45. Millar, C.I., N.L. Stephenson, and S.L. Stephens. 2007. Climate change and forests of the future: Managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecological Applications 17: 2145–2151.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Moritz, M.A. 1997. Analyzing extreme disturbance events: fire in Los Padres National Forest. Ecological Applications 7: 1252–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moritz, M.A. 1999. Controls on disturbance regime dynamics: fire in Los Padres National Forest. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
  48. Moritz, M.A. 2003. Spatio-temporal analysis of controls of shrubland fire regimes: age dependency and fire hazard. Ecology 84: 351–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Moritz, M.A., and S.L. Stephens. 2008. Fire and sustainability: considerations for California’s altered future climate. Climatic Change 87(Suppl 1): S265–S271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Moritz, M.A., J.E. Keeley, E.A. Johnson, and A.A. Schaffner. 2004. Testing a basic assumption of shrubland fire management: how important is fuel age? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2: 67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Moritz, M.A., M.E. Morais, L.A. Summerell, J.M. Carlson, and J. Doyle. 2005. Wildfires, complexity, and highly optimized tolerance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 17912–17917.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Moritz, M.A., T.J. Moody, L.J. Miles, M.M. Smith, and P. de Valpine. 2009. The fire frequency analysis branch of the pyrostatistics tree: sampling decisions and censoring in fire interval data. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 16: 271–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nash, J.C. 1990. Compact numerical methods for computers: linear algebra and function minimisation. New York: IPO Publishing.Google Scholar
  54. Newman, M.E.J. 2005. Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemporary Physics 46: 323–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nonaka, E., and T.A. Spies. 2005. Historical range of variability in landscape structure: A simulation study in Oregon, USA. Ecological Applications 15: 1727–1746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Odion, D.C., E.J. Frost, J.R. Strittholt, H. Jiang, D.A. DellaSala, and M.A. Moritz. 2004. Patterns of fire severity and forest conditions in the western Klamath Mountains, northwestern California, U.S.A. Conservation Biology 18: 927–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Odion, D.C., M.A. Moritz, and D.A. DellaSala. 2009. Alternative community states maintained by fire in the Klamath Mountains, USA. Journal of Ecology 98: 96–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Parisien, M.A., and M.A. Moritz. 2009. Environmental controls on the distribution of wildfire at multiple spatial scales. Ecological Monographs 79: 127–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pausas, J.G., R.A. Bradstock, and D.A. Keith. 2004. Plant functional traits in relation to fire in crown-fire ecosystems. Ecology 85: 1085–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pickett, S.T.A., and P.S. White. 1985. The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  61. Perera, A.H., and L.J. Buse. 2004. Emulating natural disturbance in forest management: an overview. In Emulating natural forest landscape disturbances: concepts and applications, eds. A.H. Perera, L.J. Buse, and M.G. Weber, 3–7. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Peterson, G.D. 2002. Contagious disturbance, ecological memory, and the emergence of landscape pattern. Ecosystems 5: 329–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Peterson, G.D., C.R. Allen, and C.S. Holling. 1998. Ecological resilience, biodiversity, and scale. Ecosystems 1: 6–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Polakow, D.A., and T.T. Dunne. 1999. Modelling fire-return interval T: stochasticity and censoring in the two-parameter Weibull model. Ecological Modelling 121: 79–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Polakow, D.A., and T.T. Dunne. 2001. Numerical recipes for disaster: changing hazard and the stand-origin-map. Forest Ecology and Management 147: 183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Reed, W.J., and K.S. McKelvey. 2002. Power-law behavior and parametric models for the size-distribution of forest fires. Ecological Modelling 150: 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ricotta, C., G. Avena, and M. Marchetti. 1999. The flaming sandpile: self-organized criticality and wildfires. Ecological Modelling 119: 73–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Robert, C., J.M. Carlson, and J. Doyle. 2001. Highly optimized tolerance in epidemic models incorporating local optimization and growth. Physical Review E 63: 056122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Romme, W. 1980. Fire history terminology: report of the ad hoc committee. In Proceedings of the fire history workshop. General Technical Report RM-GTR-81, eds. M.A. Stokes and J.H. Dieterich, 135–137. Fort Collins: U.S. Forest Service.Google Scholar
  70. Romme, W.H., E.H. Everham, L.E. Frelich, M.A. Moritz, and R.E. Sparks. 1998. Are large infrequent disturbances qualitatively different from small frequent disturbances? Ecosystems 1: 524–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schmidt, K.M., J.P. Menakis, C. Hardy, D.L. Bunnell, and W.J. Hann. 2002. Development of coarse-scale spatial data for wildland fire and fuel management. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-87. Fort Collins: U.S. Forest Service.Google Scholar
  72. Schoennagel, T., T.T. Veblen, W.H. Romme, J.S. Sibold, and E.R. Cook. 2005. ENSO and PDO variability affect drought-induced fire occurrence in Rocky Mountain subalpine forests. Ecological Applications 15: 2000–2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schoennagel, T., E.A. Smithwick, and M.G. Turner. 2008. Landscape heterogeneity following large fires: Insights from Yellowstone National Park, USA. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17: 742–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Solow, A.R. 2005. Power laws without complexity. Ecology Letters 8: 361–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Song, W.G., F. Weicheng, B.H. Wang, and J.J. Zhou. 2001. Self-organized criticality of forest fire in China. Ecological Modelling 145: 61–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Strauss, D., L. Bednar, and R. Mees. 1989. Do one percent of forest fires cause ninety-nine percent of the damage? Forest Science 35: 319–328.Google Scholar
  77. Swetnam, T.W., and J.L. Betancourt. 1998. Meso-scale disturbance and ecological response to decadal climatic variability in the American Southwest. Journal of Climate 11: 3128–3147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Swetnam, T.W., C.D. Allen, and J.L. Betancourt. 1999. Applied historical ecology: using the past to manage the future. Ecological Applications 9: 1189–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Turcotte, D.L. 1999. Self-organized criticality. Reports on Progress in Physics 62: 1377–1429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Turcotte, D.L., and B.D. Malamud. 2004. Landslides, forest fires, and earthquakes: examples of self-organized critical behaviour. Acta Physica 340: 580–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Turner, M.G. 1989. Landscape ecology: The effects of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20: 171–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Turner, M.G., and W.H. Romme. 1994. Landscape dynamics in crown fire ecosystems. Landscape Ecology 9: 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. White, E., B. Enquist, and J.L. Green. 2008. On estimating the exponent of power-law frequency distributions. Ecology 89: 905–912.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. White, P.S., and A. Jentsch. 2001. The Search for Generality in Studies of Disturbance and Ecosystem Dynamics. Progress in Botany 62: 399–450.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wu, J., and O.L. Loucks. 1995. From balance of nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: A paradigm shift in ecology. The Quarterly Review of Biology 70: 439–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Yee, T.W. 2006. Constrained additive ordination. Ecology 87: 203–213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Yee, T.W. 2008. The VGAM package. R News 8: 28–39.Google Scholar
  88. Zedler, P.H., C.R. Gautier, and G.S. McMaster. 1983. Vegetation change in response to extreme events: the effect of a short interval between fires in California chaparral and coastal scrub. Ecology 64: 809–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zhou, T., and J.M. Carlson. 2000. Dynamics and changing environments in highly optimized tolerance. Physical Review E 62: 3197–3204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zhou, T., J.M. Carlson, and J. Doyle. 2002. Mutation, specialization, and hypersensitivity in highly optimized tolerance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99: 2049–2054.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Max A. Moritz
    • 1
    Email author
  • Paul F. Hessburg
  • Nicholas A. Povak
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science Policy and Management, Division of Ecosystem SciencesUniversity of California BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations