The River-Refuge Hypothesis and Other Contributions of Márcio Ayres to Conservation Science

Chapter

Abstract

For more than a century, biogeographers have sought to explain the large number of species found in Amazonian forests. The role of rivers as barriers to dispersal was recognized early on and this was the first evolutionary hypothesis to explain Amazonian diversity. Most of the recent debate on speciation in the Amazon has focused on the role of Pleistocene refugia. The methods of refuge biogeography helped shape early conservation priorities in Amazonia, although actual plans did not directly depend on the conceptual strengths or weaknesses of refugia biogeography. These approaches viewed people mostly as threats, though not always explicitly. Based on his work on primate distribution, Márcio Ayres formulated a synthetic speciation theory, the river-refuge hypothesis. The river-refuge model successfully resolved some of the historical and technical challenges of the earlier hypotheses. His work in várzea conservation, informed by this conceptual breakthrough, recognized that the maintenance of processes is at least as important as species numbers in prioritizing action. The work of Márcio Ayres broadened the scope of conservation in Amazonia by moving beyond the model of people-as-threats, and this was as great a conceptual contribution to conservation as anyone could make.

Keywords

Refugia River-refuge Speciation Connectivity Conservation of dynamics 

References

  1. Ayres, J. M. (1986a). The conservation status of the white uakari. Primate Conservation, 7, 22–26.Google Scholar
  2. Ayres, J. M. (1986b). Uakaris and Amazonian flooded forest. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  3. Ayres, J. M., & Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1992). River boundaries and species range size in Amazonian primates. The American Naturalist, 140, 531–537.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayres, J. M., & Johns, A. D. (1987). Conservation of white uacaries in Amazonian várzea. Oryx, 6, 74–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bates, H. W. (1863). The naturalist on the river Amazon. London: Murray.Google Scholar
  6. Burgess, N. D., Hales, J. D. A., Ricketts, T. H., & Dinerstein, E. (2006). Factoring species, non-species values and threats into biodiversity prioritisation across the ecoregions of Africa and its islands. Biological Conservation, 127, 383–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Capparella, A. P. (1988). Genetic variation in neotropical birds: Implication for the speciation process. In H. Ouellet (Ed.), Acta XIX Congressus Internationalis Ornithologici. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
  8. Capparella, A. P. (1991). Neotropical avian diversity and riverine barriers. In B. D. Bell (Ed.), Proceedings 20th international ornithological congress. Wellington, New Zealand: Congressional Trust Board.Google Scholar
  9. Croizat, L. (1981). Biogeography: Past, present, and future. In G. Nelson & D. E. Rosen (Eds.), Vicariance biogeography: A critique. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Darlington, P. J., Jr. (1957). Zoogeography: The geographical distribution of animals. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Endler, J. A. (1982). Problems in distinguishing historical from ecological factors in biogeography. American Zoologist, 22, 441–452.Google Scholar
  12. Fjeldså, J. (1994). Geographical patterns for relict and young species of birds in Africa and South America and implications for conservation priorities. Biodiversity and Conservation, 3, 207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haffer, J. (1969). Speciation in Amazonian forest birds. Science, 165, 131–137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haffer, J. (1993). Time’s cycle and time’s arrow in the history of Amazonia. Biogeographica, 69, 15–45.Google Scholar
  15. Haffer, J. (1997). Alternative models of speciation in Amazonia: an overview. Biodiversity and Conservation, 6, 451–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hayes, F. E., & Sewlal, J. A. N. (2004). The Amazon river as a dispersal barrier to passerine birds: Effects of river width, habitat and taxonomy. Journal of Biogeography, 31, 1809–1818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hershkovitz, P. (1977). Living new world Monkeys (Platyrrhini). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Junk, W. J., Bayley, P. B., & Sparks, R. E. (1989). The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 106, 110–127.Google Scholar
  19. Laurance, W. F., Lovejoy, T. E., Vasconcelos, H. L., Bruna, E. M., Didham, R. K., Stouffer, P. C., et al. (2002). Ecosystem decay of Amazonian forest fragments: A 22-year investigation. Conservation Biology, 16, 605–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Laurance, W. F., Vasconcelos, H. L., & Lovejoy, T. E. (2000). Forest loss and fragmentation in the Amazon: Implications for wildlife conservation. Oryx, 34, 39–45.Google Scholar
  21. Laurance, W. F., Oliveira, A. A., Laurance, S. G., Condit, R., Nascimento, H. E. M., Sanchez-Thorin, A. C., et al. (2004). Pervasive alteration of tree communities in undisturbed Amazonian forests. Nature, 428, 171–175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lovejoy, T. E. (1982). Designing refugia for tomorrow. In G. T. Prance (Ed.), Biological diversification in the tropics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lovejoy, T. E. (1983). The science of Amazon conservation. The Environmentalist, 3, 57–61.Google Scholar
  24. Martins, E. S., Ayres, J. M., & Ribeiro de Valle, M. B. (1988). On the status of Ateles belzebuth marginatus with notes on other primates of the Iriri river basin. Primate Conservation, 9, 87–91.Google Scholar
  25. Morrone, J. J., & Crisci, J. V. (1995). Historical biogeography: Introduction to methods. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 26, 373–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nelson, B. W., Ferreira, C. A. C., da Silva, M. F., & Kawasaki, M. L. (1990). Endemism centres, refugia and botanical collection density in Brazilian Amazonia. Nature, 345, 714–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Neumann, R. P. (1996). Dukes, earls, and ersatz Edens: Aristocratic nature preservationists in colonial Africa. Environment and Planning D: Society & Space, 14, 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Neumann, R. P. (1997). Primitive ideas: Protected area buffer zones and the politics of land in Africa. Development and Change, 28, 559–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nores, M. (1999). An alternative hypothesis for the origin of Amazonian bird diversity. Journal of Biogeography, 26, 475–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nores, M. (2004). The implications of tertiary and quaternary sea level rise events for avian ­distribution patterns in the lowlands of northern South America. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 13, 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oren, D. C. (1982). Testing the refuge model for South America: A hypothesis to evaluate discrepancies in refuges number across taxa. In G. T. Prance (Ed.), Biological diversification in the tropics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Patton, J. L., Da Silva, M. N. F., & Malcolm, J. R. (1994). Gene genealogy and differentiation among arboreal spiny rats (Rodentia: Echimyidae) of the Amazon basin: A test of the riverine barrier hypothesis. Evolution, 48, 1314–1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Peres, C. A. (2001). Paving the way to the future of Amazonia. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 16, 217–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peres, C. A. (2005). Why we need megareserves in Amazonia. Conservation Biology, 19, 728–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Peres, C. A., & Terborgh, J. W. (1995). Amazonian nature reserves: An analysis of the defensibility status of existing conservation units and design criteria for the future. Conservation Biology, 9, 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pitman, N. C. A., & Jorgensen, P. M. (2002). Estimating the size of the world’s threatened flora. Science, 298, 989.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Prance, G. T. (1982). Biological diversification in the tropics. In G. T. Prance (Ed.), Biological diversification in the tropics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Ribas, C. C., Gaban-Lima, R., Miyaki, C. Y., & Cracraft, J. (2005). Historical biogeography and diversification within the neotropical parrot genus Pionopsitta (Aves: Psittacidae). Journal of Biogeography, 32, 1409–1427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vanzolini, P. E., & Williams, E. E. (1970). South American anoles: The geographic differentiation and evolution of the Anolis chrysolepis species group (Sauria, Iguanidae). Arquivo Zoologico do Sao Paulo, 19, 1–298.Google Scholar
  40. Wallace, A. R. (1853). A narrative of travels on the Amazon and Rio Negro, with an account of the native tribes, and observations on the climate, geology, and natural history of the Amazon valley. London: Reeve & Co.Google Scholar
  41. Wallace, A. R. (1876). The geographical distribution of animals; with a study of the relations of living and extinct faunas as elucidating the past changes of the earth’s surface. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
  42. Wallace, A. R. (1881). Island life; or, the phenomena and causes of insular faunas and floras, including a revision and attempted solution of the problem of geological climates. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
  43. Wallace, R. B., Painter, R. L. E., Taber, A. B., & Ayres, J. M. (1996). Notes on a distributional river boundary and southern range extension for two species of Amazonian primates. Neotropical Primates, 4, 149–151.Google Scholar
  44. Wetterberg, G. B., Prance, G. T., & Lovejoy, T. E. (1981). Conservation progress in Amazonia: A structural review. Parks, 6, 5–10.Google Scholar
  45. Whinnett, A., Zimmermann, M., Willmott, K. R., Herrera, N., Mallarino, R., Simpson, F., et al. (2005). Strikingly variable divergence times inferred across an Amazonian butterfly ‘suture zone’. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 272, 2525–2533.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Williams, P. H., Margules, C. R., & Hilbert, D. W. (2002). Data requirements and data sources for biodiversity priority area selection. Journal of Biosciences, 27, 327–338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miguel A. Pinedo-Vasquez
    • 1
  • Liliana M. Dávalos
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Environmental Research and ConservationColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and EvolutionState University of New York at Stony BrookStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations