Introduction: Strategies for Social and Environmental Conservation in Conservation Units

Chapter

Abstract

Two groups of considerations are essential for choosing strategies for conservation: linking conservation to the interests of local peoples, and linking conservation to core national and global interests. This section addresses the question of conservation strategies in conservation units by presenting several examples in specific areas that are also parts of a wider effort towards formulation of strategies for social and environmental conservation in Brazilian Amazonia. Brazil’s conservation units are grouped into two categories: “sustainable use” and “integral protection”. At present, opportunities are more evident for the former rather than the latter. However, one must be constantly aware that supposedly “sustainable” activities are not always sustainable nor are they invariably environmentally benign. There must be constant reinforcement of awareness among local people who receive payments for environmental services that it is their role as environmental guardians that is the reason for the support they receive. There has been notable progress over the last few years in rating conservation units and in organizing civil society so that they act as a force for conservation. However, these rest on a shaky foundation since political considerations may reverse this progress. Several recent instances illustrate the fragile nature of environmental advances and indicate the need for a concerted effort to elevate the environment in decision-making in Brazil.

Keywords

Amazonia Brazil Parks Protected areas Reserves 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Presented as “Estratégia de Conservação Socio-Ambiental em Unidades de Conservação” in “Conferência Internacional: Conservação e Desenvolvimento na Várzea: Aprendendo com o passado, construíndo o futuro,” Programa PróVárzea, Manaus, 4–7 December 2006. The Conselho Nacional do Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq: Proc. 306031/2004–3, 474548/2006–6, 557152/2005–4, 420199/2005–5), Rede GEOMA and the Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA: PPI PRJ05.57) contributed financial support.

References

  1. Fearnside, P. M. (1989a). Forest management in Amazonia: The need for new criteria in evaluating development options. Forest Ecology and Management, 27(1), 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fearnside, P. M. (1989b). Extractive reserves in Brazilian Amazonia: An opportunity to maintain tropical rain forest under sustainable use. BioScience, 39(6), 387–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fearnside, P. M. (1997). Environmental services as a strategy for sustainable development in rural Amazonia. Ecological Economics, 20(1), 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fearnside, P. M. (2003). Conservation policy in Brazilian Amazonia: Understanding the dilemmas. World Development, 31(5), 757–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fearnside, P. M., & Graça, P. M. L. A. (2006). BR-319: Brazil’s Manaus-Porto Velho Highway and the potential impact of linking the arc of deforestation to central Amazonia. Environmental Management, 38(5), 705–716.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Folha de São Paulo (2006) Em péssima companhia. Folha de São Paulo, 3 December 2006. http://www.mre.gov.br/portugues/noticiario/nacional/selecao_detalhe.asp?ID_RESENHA=288089.
  7. Gallas, D. (2006). ONG Critica Brasil por votação na ONU sobre Darfur. BBC Brasil, 7 December 2006. http://www.bbc.co.uk/portuguese/reporterbbc/story/2006/12/061207_darfur_dg.shtml.
  8. O Globo (2006) Anistia acusa Brasil de omissão no massacre de Darfur. O Globo [Rio de Janeiro] 12 December 2006. http://g1.globo.com/Noticias/Politica/0,,AA1384081–5601,00.html.
  9. Leal, L. N. (2007). Lula acusa Ibama de atrasar PAC e diz que fará cobrança dura a Marina: Presidente exige soluções para entraves ambientais e dá sinais de que quer mudanças no comando do instituto. O Estado de São Paulo, 20 April 2007. http://www.cutsp.org.br/clipping/2007/clipping%2020042007.doc.
  10. MacArthur, R. H., & Wilson, E. O. (1967). The theory of island biogeography (Monographs in Population Biology, Vol. 1). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. McGrath, D. G. (2000). Avoiding a tragedy of the commons: Recent developments in the management of Amazonian fisheries. In A. Hall (Ed.), Amazonia at the crossroads: the challenge of sustainable development. London: Institute of Latin American Studies (ILAS), University of London.Google Scholar
  12. Paraguassú, L., & Nossa, L. (2006). Alencar elogia Marina e defende sua permanência no ­governo. O Estado de São Paulo, 6 December 2006. http://clipping.planejamento.gov.br/Noticias.asp?NOTCod=324567.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da AmazôniaManausBrazil

Personalised recommendations