Introduction: Strategies for Social and Environmental Conservation in Conservation Units
Two groups of considerations are essential for choosing strategies for conservation: linking conservation to the interests of local peoples, and linking conservation to core national and global interests. This section addresses the question of conservation strategies in conservation units by presenting several examples in specific areas that are also parts of a wider effort towards formulation of strategies for social and environmental conservation in Brazilian Amazonia. Brazil’s conservation units are grouped into two categories: “sustainable use” and “integral protection”. At present, opportunities are more evident for the former rather than the latter. However, one must be constantly aware that supposedly “sustainable” activities are not always sustainable nor are they invariably environmentally benign. There must be constant reinforcement of awareness among local people who receive payments for environmental services that it is their role as environmental guardians that is the reason for the support they receive. There has been notable progress over the last few years in rating conservation units and in organizing civil society so that they act as a force for conservation. However, these rest on a shaky foundation since political considerations may reverse this progress. Several recent instances illustrate the fragile nature of environmental advances and indicate the need for a concerted effort to elevate the environment in decision-making in Brazil.
KeywordsAmazonia Brazil Parks Protected areas Reserves
Presented as “Estratégia de Conservação Socio-Ambiental em Unidades de Conservação” in “Conferência Internacional: Conservação e Desenvolvimento na Várzea: Aprendendo com o passado, construíndo o futuro,” Programa PróVárzea, Manaus, 4–7 December 2006. The Conselho Nacional do Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq: Proc. 306031/2004–3, 474548/2006–6, 557152/2005–4, 420199/2005–5), Rede GEOMA and the Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA: PPI PRJ05.57) contributed financial support.
- Folha de São Paulo (2006) Em péssima companhia. Folha de São Paulo, 3 December 2006. http://www.mre.gov.br/portugues/noticiario/nacional/selecao_detalhe.asp?ID_RESENHA=288089.
- Gallas, D. (2006). ONG Critica Brasil por votação na ONU sobre Darfur. BBC Brasil, 7 December 2006. http://www.bbc.co.uk/portuguese/reporterbbc/story/2006/12/061207_darfur_dg.shtml.
- O Globo (2006) Anistia acusa Brasil de omissão no massacre de Darfur. O Globo [Rio de Janeiro] 12 December 2006. http://g1.globo.com/Noticias/Politica/0,,AA1384081–5601,00.html.
- Leal, L. N. (2007). Lula acusa Ibama de atrasar PAC e diz que fará cobrança dura a Marina: Presidente exige soluções para entraves ambientais e dá sinais de que quer mudanças no comando do instituto. O Estado de São Paulo, 20 April 2007. http://www.cutsp.org.br/clipping/2007/clipping%2020042007.doc.
- MacArthur, R. H., & Wilson, E. O. (1967). The theory of island biogeography (Monographs in Population Biology, Vol. 1). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- McGrath, D. G. (2000). Avoiding a tragedy of the commons: Recent developments in the management of Amazonian fisheries. In A. Hall (Ed.), Amazonia at the crossroads: the challenge of sustainable development. London: Institute of Latin American Studies (ILAS), University of London.Google Scholar
- Paraguassú, L., & Nossa, L. (2006). Alencar elogia Marina e defende sua permanência no governo. O Estado de São Paulo, 6 December 2006. http://clipping.planejamento.gov.br/Noticias.asp?NOTCod=324567.