Art, Meaning and Occasion-Sensitivity

Chapter
Part of the Philosophical Studies Series book series (PSSP, volume 115)

Abstract

In Chapter 1, the contrast between the artistic and the aesthetic was assumed, while trying to motivate it. But could that contrast plausibly be denied? To be clear, my argument (repeated in various forms throughout this work) is that denying the contrast must involve denying the concept art (at least, on more than a sociological understanding of that concept), because the artistic/aesthetic contrast brings out the distinctiveness of the concept art. At the least, philosophical aesthetics can reject neither the concept art tout court nor the distinctiveness of artworks (compared with other objects of aesthetic interest), although it is granted on all sides that objects other than artworks can be beautiful, can reflect their authors’ ideas, can be expressive in some sense (see Lyas, 1997: 103–105), and so on. That is, at first sight no list of properties seems uniquely applicable to artworks. But this conflicts with our sense of the distinctiveness of the artwork (compared with, say, wallpaper: see Section 1.1); in particular, with our sense of the artwork as valuable (in a non-monetary fashion) in ways not available to, for instance, that wallpaper.

Keywords

Musical Work Artistic Property Artistic Feature Swan Lake Aesthetic Object 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adorno, T. (2002) Essays on Music (Selected by Richard Leppart). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Austin, J. L. (1962) Sense and Sensibilia. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  3. Austin, J. L. (1970) Philosophical Papers (Second Edition). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  4. Baker, G. (1977) “Defeasibility and Meaning” in P. Hacker & J. Raz (eds.) Law, Morality and Society. Oxford: Clarendon: 26–57.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, G. (1981) “Following Wittgenstein: Some Signposts from Philosophical Investigations §§143–242” in S. Holtzman & C. Leich (eds.) Wittgenstein: To Follow a Rule. London: Routledge: 31–71.Google Scholar
  6. Baker, G. (2004) Wittgenstein’s Method: Neglected Aspects. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Baker, G. & Hacker, P. (1980) Wittgenstein: Understanding and Meaning (An Analytical Commentary on the Philosophical Investigations, Volume 1). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Berg, A. [1924] (1965) “Why is Schoenberg’s Music so Difficult to Understand?” in reprinted in W. Reich (ed.) The Life and Work of Alban Berg. London: Thames & Hudson: 189–204.Google Scholar
  9. Best, D. (1987) Philosophy and Human Movement. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  10. Cavell, S. (1969) Must We Mean What We Say? New York, NY: Scribners.Google Scholar
  11. Cavell, S. (1981) Pursuits of Happiness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dancy, J. (2004) Ethics Without Principles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Danto, A. (1981) The Transfiguration of the Commonplace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Danto, A. (1986) The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Danto, A. (1992) Beyond the Brillo Box. New York, NY: Farrar, Strauss, Giroux.Google Scholar
  16. Danto, A. (1993) “Responses and Replies” in M. Rollins (ed.) Danto and His Critics. Oxford: Blackwell: 193–216.Google Scholar
  17. Danto, A. (1997) After the End of Art: Contemporary Art and the Pale of History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Danto, A. (1999) “Indiscernibility and Perception: A Reply to Margolis”, British Journal of Aesthetics, 39, 4: 321–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Danto, A. (2000) “Art and Meaning” in N. Carroll (ed.) Theories of Art Today. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press: 130–140.Google Scholar
  20. Empson, W. (1935) Some Versions of Pastoral. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
  21. Feyerabend, P. K. (1987) Farewell to Reason. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
  22. Fish, S. (1980) Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Goodman, N. (1968) Languages of Art. Indianapolis, NY: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
  24. Greenberg, C. (1999) Homemade Esthetics: Observations on Art and Taste. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Grice, P. (1989) Studies in the Ways of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Ground, I. (1989) Art or Bunk? Bristol: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hanfling, O. (2004) “Wittgenstein on Music and Language” in P. Lewis (ed.) Wittgenstein, Aesthetics and Philosophy. Aldershot: Ashgate: 151–162.Google Scholar
  28. Hirsch, E. D. (1966) Validity in Interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Kuhn, T. (2000) The Road Since Structure: Philosophical Essays 1970–1993. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Levinson, J. (1990) Music, Art and Music: Essays in Philosophical Aesthetics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Lyas, C. (1997) Aesthetics. London: UCL Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McFee, G. (1978) Much of Jackson Pollock is Vivid Wallpaper. New York, NY: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  33. McFee, G. (1994) “Pictorial Representation in Art”, British Journal of Aesthetics, 34, 1: 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McFee, G. (1997) “Meaning and the Art-Status of Music Alone”, British Journal of Aesthetics, 37, 1: 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McFee, G. (1998) “Truth, Arts Education and the ‘Postmodern Condition’” in D. Carr (ed.) Education, Knowledge and Truth: Beyond the Postmodern Impasse. London: Routledge: 80–95.Google Scholar
  36. McFee, G. (1999) “Wittgenstein on Art and Aspects”, Philosophical Investigations, 22, 3, July: 262–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McFee, G. (2001) “Wittgenstein, Performing Art and Action” in R. Allen & M. Turvey (eds.) Wittgenstein, Theory and the Arts. London: Routledge: 92–116.Google Scholar
  38. McFee, G. (2004c) “Wittgenstein and the Arts: Understanding and Performing” in P. Lewis (ed.) Wittgenstein, Aesthetics and Philosophy. Aldershot: Ashgate: 109–136.Google Scholar
  39. Pichler, A. (1991) Ludwig Wittgenstein, Vermischte Bermerkungen: Liste der Manuskriptquellen, Schriften des Wittgenstein Archivs, University of Bergen, Norway, Nr 1.Google Scholar
  40. Schapiro, M. (1995) Mondrian: On the Humanity of Abstract Painting. New York, NY: George Braziller.Google Scholar
  41. Sharpe, R. A. (2000) Music and Humanism: An Essay in the Aesthetics of Music. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  42. Stroud, B. (2000) Understanding Human Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Travis, C. (1989) The Uses of Sense. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  44. Travis, C. (1997) “Reply to Simmons”, Mind, 106: 119–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Travis, C. (2004a) “The Limits of Empiricism”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, CIV: 245–270.Google Scholar
  46. Travis, C. (2006) Thought’s Footing. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Travis, C. (2008) Occasion-Sensitivity: Selected Essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wittgenstein, L. (2009) Philosophical Investigations (trans. G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker, & J. Schulte) [Fourth Edition]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  49. Wollheim, R. (1980) Art and Its Objects (Second Edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Ziff, P. (1972) Understanding Understanding. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EastbourneUK

Personalised recommendations