Connected at Infinity II pp 38-57

Part of the Texts and Readings in Mathematics book series (volume 67)

Frobenius Splittings

  • Wilberd van der Kallen
Chapter

Abstract

Frobenius splittings were introduced by V. B. Mehta and A. Ramanathan in [6] and refined further by S. Ramanan and Ramanathan in [9]. Frobenius splittings have proven to be a amazingly effective when they apply. Proofs involving Frobenius splittings tend to be very efficient. Other methods usually require a much more detailed knowledge of the object under study. For instance, while showing that the intersection of one union of Schubert varieties with another union of Schubert varieties is reduced, one does not need to know where that intersection is situated, let alone what it looks like exactly.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    M. Brion and S. Kumar, Frobenius Splitting Methods in Geometry and Representation Theory, Birkhäuser Boston 2005.MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    D. Eisenbud, Commutative algebra. With a view toward algebraic geometry. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 150. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995.MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    R. Hartshorne, Algebraic Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 52, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1977.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    V. Lakshmibai, V.B. Mehta and A.J. Parameswaran, Frobenius splittings and blowups, J. Algebra, 208 (1998), 101–128.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    O. Mathieu, Tilting modules and their applications. Analysis on homogeneous spaces and representation theory of Lie groups, Okayama-Kyoto (1997), 145–212, Adv. Stud. Pure Math., 26, Math. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, 2000.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    V. B. Mehta and A. Ramanathan, Probenius splitting and cohomology vanishing for Schubert varieties, Annals of Math. 122 (1985), 27–40.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    V.B. Mehta and V. Srinivas, Normality of Schubert varieties, American Journal of Math. 109 (1987), 987–989.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    J. Oesterlé, Dégénerescence de la suite spectrale de Hodge vers De Rham, Exposé 673, Séminaire Bourbaki, Astérisque 152–153 (1987), 67–83.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    S. Ramanan and A. Ramanathan, Projective normality of flag varieties and Schubert varieties. Invent. Math. 79 (1985), no. 2, 217–224.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    R.G. Swan, On seminormality. J. Algebra 67 (1980), no. 1, 210–229.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Wilberd van der Kallen, Lectures on Probenius splittings and B-modules. Notes by S.P. Inamdar, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay, and Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Hindustan Book Agency 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wilberd van der Kallen
    • 1
  1. 1.Mathematisch InstituutUniversiteit UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations