Nanotechnology and the Law of Armed Conflict

Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

Nanotechnology is a rapidly evolving field of science cutting across many disciplines including engineering, quantum physics, optics, chemistry and biology, and typically involves manipulation of matter on the atomic and molecular level in the size range of 1–100 nm (1 nm = 10−9 m) in one or more external dimensions. It enables, for example, the increased and tailored rate of energy release, manipulation of optical properties, increased electrical conductivity, and improved hardness and strength with reduced weight, which can find useful applications for advanced military equipment and weaponry. The introduction of nanotechnology into weaponry is also expected to influence the application and interpretation of the law of armed conflict, raising the question as to whether the existing rules are sufficiently clear and adequate in light of the technology’s specific characteristics, as well as with regard to the foreseeable humanitarian impact it may have. This chapter revisits the rationale underlying the law of armed conflict and examines to what extent the problems arising from the use of nanotechnology-enhanced or enabled weapons could adequately be addressed within the current legal framework governing weaponry. To that end, this chapter focuses on the three enhanced capabilities that nanotechnology introduces to weaponry: (1) penetration; (2) accuracy and manipulation in the delivery of focused force application; and (3) camouflaging.

Keywords

Nuclear Weapon Armed Conflict Defense Advance Research Project Agency Additional Protocol Advisory Opinion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Altmann J (2006) Military nanotechnology. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrew D (2003) Thermobaric munitions and their medical effects. Aust Mil Med 12(1):9–12Google Scholar
  3. Aricò AS et al (2005) Nanostructured materials for advanced energy conversion and storage devices. Nat Mater 4:366–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baxter RR (1951) So-called ‘unprivileged belligerency’: spies, guerrillas, and saboteurs. British Year B Int Law 28:323–345Google Scholar
  5. Bean JR (2004) Enhanced blast weapons and forward medical treatment. US Army Med Dep J, April–June:48–51Google Scholar
  6. Benkoski JJ et al (2012) Systems engineering at the nanoscale. In: George T et al (eds) Micro- and nanotechnology sensors, systems, and applications IV, conference No 8373, Proceedings of SPIE Defense, Security and Sensing, Baltimore, 837318Google Scholar
  7. Blake D, Imburgia JS (2010) Bloodless weapons? the need to conduct legal reviews of certain capabilities and the implications of defining them as ‘weapons’. Air Force Law Rev 66:157–203Google Scholar
  8. Boothby WH (2009) Weapons and the law of armed conflict. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Candelaria SL et al (2012) Nanostructured carbon for energy storage and conversion. Nano Energy 1:195–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cassese A (2008) The human dimension of international law: selected papers. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DARPA Defense Science Office (2013) Nano air vehicle (NAV). http://www.darpa.mil/Our_Work/DSO/Programs/Nano_Air_Vehicle_(NAV).aspx. Accessed 2 Jan 2013
  12. Davis WA (2007) Nano air vehicles: a technology forecast. Blue Horizons Paper, Center for Strategy and Technology, US Air War College. http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/cst/bh_davis.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2013
  13. Di Falco A et al (2010) Flexible metamaterials at visible wavelengths. New J Phys 12:11300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferrell WH (2003) No shirt, no shoes, no status: uniforms, distinction, and special operations in international armed conflict. Mil Law Rev 178:94–140Google Scholar
  15. Fiedeler U, Fries R (2012) Measurement and characterisation of airborne nanoparticles. Nano Trust Dossiers 25:1–6Google Scholar
  16. Fry JD (2006) Contextualized legal reviews for the methods and means of warfare: cave combat and international humanitarian law. Columbia J Transnl Law 44:453–519Google Scholar
  17. Glasstone S, Dolan PJ (1977) The effects of nuclear weapons, 3rd edn. US Government Printing Office, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  18. Green LC (2000) The contemporary law of armed conflict, 2nd edn. Manchester University Press, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  19. Henckaerts J-M, Doswald-Beck L (2005) Customary international humanitarian law. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ibrügger L (2005) The security implications of nanotechnology. Report to the NATO Parliamentary Assembly, 179 STCMT 05 EGoogle Scholar
  21. Ipsen K (2008) Combatants and non-combatants. In: Fleck D (ed) The handbook of international humanitarian law, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 79–117Google Scholar
  22. Kanel GI et al (2009) Rate of energy release in high explosives containing nano-size boron particles. Cent Eur J Energ Mater 6(1):15–30Google Scholar
  23. Kosal ME (2009) Nanotechnology for chemical and biological defense. Springer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Last HR et al (1999) Nano-to-millimeter scale integrated systems. IEEE Trans Compon Packag Technol 22(2):338–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee T-W (2009) Military technologies of the world. Praeger Security International, Rhode IslandGoogle Scholar
  26. Levitsky IA (2010) Highly sensitive and selective explosive detector based on nanoporous silicon photonic crystal infiltrated with emissive organics. IEEE Nanotechnol Mag 4(3):24–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mallison WT, Mallison SV (1977) The juridical status of irregular combatants under the international humanitarian law of armed conflict. Case West Reserv J Int Law 9:39–78Google Scholar
  28. McCormack TLH (1997) A non-liquet on nuclear weapons—the ICJ avoids the application of general principles of international humanitarian law. Int Rev Red Cross 316:76–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Medalia J (2004) Nuclear weapon initiatives: low-yield R&D, advanced concepts, earth penetrators, test readiness. CRS Report for Congress. http://www.fas.org/AFFC092D-DF38-4244-97E2-CAD5097EBA63/FinalDownload/DownloadId-665FCEEDE2DEEF06BE33B0570FFFC10A/AFFC092D-DF38-4244-97E2-CAD5097EBA63/spp/starwars/crs/RL32130.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2013
  30. Melzer N (2008) Targeted killing in international law. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miziolek AW (2002) Nanoenergetics: an emerging technology area of national importance. AMPTIAC Newsl 6(1):43–48Google Scholar
  32. Nasu H (2012) Nanotechnology and challenges to international humanitarian law: a preliminary legal assessment. Int Rev Red Cross 94:653–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nasu H, Faunce T (2010) Nanotechnology and the international law of weaponry: towards international regulation of nano-weapons. J Law Inf Sci 20:21–54Google Scholar
  34. Nelson RW (2002) Low-yield earth-penetrating nuclear weapons. Sci Glob Secur 10:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pictet J (ed) (1960) Commentary on the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War. International Committee of the Red Cross, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  36. Quéguiner JF (2006) Precautions under the law governing the conduct of hostilities. Int Rev Red Cross 88:793–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Roberts A, Guelff R (2000) Documents on the laws of war, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  38. Rudesill DS (2007) Precision war and responsibility: transformational military technology and the duty of care under the laws of war. Yale J Int Law 32:517–545Google Scholar
  39. Sandoz Y et al (eds) (1987) Commentary on the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949. Martinus Nijhoff/International Committee of the Red Cross, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  40. Scott JB (1920) The proceedings of the Hague Peace Conference: translation of the official texts. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Shi H-F et al (2011) Low density carbon nanotube forest as an index-matched and near perfect absorption coating. Appl Phys Lett 99:211103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sidel VW et al (2003) The threat of low-yield earth-penetrating nuclear weapons to civilian populations: nuclear ‘bunker busters’ and their medical consequences. International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War. http://cisac.stanford.edu/publications/threat_of_lowyield_earthpenetrating_nuclear_weapons_to_civilian_populations_the. Accessed 27 May 2013
  43. Sloan ES (2002) The revolution in military affairs. McGill-Queen’s University Press, MontrealGoogle Scholar
  44. UK Ministry of Defence (2004) The manual of the law of armed conflict. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang J, Dortmans PJ (2004) A review of selected nanotechnology topics and their potential military applications. Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Australian Government Department of Defence. http://www.dsto.defence.gov.au/publications/2610/DSTO-TN-0537.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2013

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press and the authors 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ANU College of LawAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations