Jurisdiction, Fair Trial and Public Policy: The Krombach and Gambazzi Cases

Chapter

Abstract

Two different events—one full of sad human implications (Krombach), the other mostly financial (Gambazzi)—gave rise to two extremely important decisions by the EU Court of Justice dealing with the public policy exception. Both judgments address the problem of the respondent’s forced non-attendance in the a quo proceeding, pointing out the evaluation criteria for the exequatur to the judge of recognition.

Keywords

National Court Criminal Procedure Advocate General Fair Trial Commercial Matter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Carella G (2009) Nominalismo e lotta al terrorismo internazionale: il caso delle extraordinary renditions. In: Venturini G, Bariatti S (eds) Individual rights and international justice. Liber Fausto Pocar, vol I. Giuffrè, Milan, pp 111–123Google Scholar
  2. Cuniberti G (2009) La reconnaissance en France des jugements par défaut anglais. À propos de l’affaire Gambazzi-Stolzenberg. Revue critique de droit international privé 4:685–714Google Scholar
  3. Pedrazzi M (2009) Irregular apprehension in international criminal law: male captus bene detentus? In: Venturini G, Bariatti S (eds) Individual rights and international justice. Liber Fausto Pocar, vol I. Giuffrè, Milan, pp 681–694Google Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. ASSER PRESS, The Hague, The Netherlands, and the authors 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Emeritus ProfessorUniversity of PaviaPaviaItaly

Personalised recommendations