Institutionalization or Intergovernmental Decision-Taking in Foreign Policy: The Implementation of the Lisbon Treaty

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter analyses the evolving nature of the foreign policy of the EU as a consequence of the set up of new structures such as the office of the High Representative/Vice President and the European External Action Service. It argues that while decision-taking in CFSP and CSDP remains intergovernmental for the most part, the strengthened power of initiative granted to the new services has introduced critical changes in EU foreign policy-making. The first developments under the Lisbon Treaty hint a process of institutionalisation by practice in EU foreign policy initiative, which relates to the personalities at the top of new EU structures, the changes of procedures in the elaboration of policy papers and meeting agendas and the management of crisis situations. This process of institutionalisation by practice, as well as the reaction of EU Member States to it, is examined particularly with regard to the working relations between the new foreign policy structures and the Political and Security Committee of the EU.

Keywords

Member State Foreign Policy Foreign Minister External Relation Lisbon Treaty 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Crowe B (2008) The European External Action Service. Roadmap for Success, Chatham House Papers, www.chathamhouse.org.uk/publications/papers/download/-/id/621/file/11583_0508eas_report.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2011
  2. de Vasconcelos A (2010) After Lisbon: the states of the Union, issues. Institute for Security Studies of the European Union, Paris. www.iss.europa.eu/uploads/media/ISSues-31.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2011
  3. Grevi G (2007) The institutional framework of external action. In: Amato G, Bribosia H, De Witte B (eds) Genesis and destiny of the European constitution. Commentary on the Treaty establishing a constitution for Europe in the light of the Travaux Préparatoires and future prospects. Bruylant, Brussels, pp 773–806Google Scholar
  4. Piris J-C (2010) The Lisbon Treaty. A legal and political analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  5. Smith ME (2004) Europe’s foreign and security policy. The institutionalization of cooperation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Vanhoonacker S (2005) The institutional framework. In: Hill C, Smith ME (eds) International relations and the European Union. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 67–90Google Scholar
  7. Weiss S (2010) External Action Service. Much ado about nothing. Spotlight Europe 5. www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/cps/rde/xbcr/SID-3662273323E772BC/bst/spotlight_europe_European_External_Action_Service_KLEIN.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2011
  8. Wessels W, Bopp F (2008) The institutional architecture of CFSP after the Lisbon Treaty. Constitutional breakthrough or challenges ahead? Centre for European Policy Studies Research Paper No 10Google Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. ASSER PRESS, The Hague, The Netherlands, and the author 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.London School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUK

Personalised recommendations