Palestine Statehood: A Rejoinder to Professor Robert Weston Ash
Professor Robert Weston Ash, in his response to my article The Palestine Declaration to the International Criminal Court: The Statehood Issue [supra in this Volume, Chap. 10—ChM], takes issue with my position that Palestine is a state.
KeywordsInternational Community International Criminal Legal Consequence Rome Statute Geneva Convention
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
- Ash R (2009) Is Palestine A “State”? A Response to Professor John Quigley’s Article, “The Palestine Declaration to The International Criminal Court: The Statehood Issue. Rutgers Law Record 36:186–201. http://www.lawrecord.com/files/36-Rutgers-L-Rec-186.pdf [also in this Volume, Chapter 11]
- Dinstein Y (2009) The International Law of Belligerent Occupation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Kempster N (1989) PLO Urged to Drop Bid to UN Unit; U.S. Warns it would Withhold Money for Health Agency, 3 May 1989. L.A. TimesGoogle Scholar
- Lewis P (1989) Arabs at UN Relax Stand on PLO, 6 December 1989. N.Y. TimesGoogle Scholar
- Quigley J (2009) The Palestine Declaration to the International Criminal Court: The Statehood Issue. Rutgers Law Record 35:1–10. http://www.lawrecord.com/files/35-rutgers-l-rec-1.pdf [also in this Volume, Chapter 10]
- Suy E (1978) The Status of Observers in International Organizations. 160 Rec. Des Cours (Hague Acad Int Law) 75:138–139Google Scholar
- Talmon S (1998) Recognition of Governments in International Law: With Particular Reference to Governments in Exile. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
© T.M.C. ASSER PRESS, The Hague, The Netherlands, and the authors 2011