Advertisement

The Contemporary Law of Blockade and the Gaza Freedom Flotilla

  • Andrew SangerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law book series (YIHL, volume 13)

Abstract

In the early hours of 31 May 2010, Israel intercepted six vessels on the high seas carrying humanitarian aid to Gaza, prompting a highly contentious debate over the legality of the interception and the blockade on Gaza. This paper examines the blockade and interception from the perspective of international law, and in doing so, it explores three pivotal sets of questions: (1) can Israel invoke a prima facie right to blockade Gaza? What is the legal basis for this right? What effect, if any, does the characterisation of the Israeli-Hamas conflict have? (2) If Israel does have a prima facie right to blockade Gaza, is the blockade legally constituted and maintained? What factors must be taken into consideration? Finally (3) can Israel lawfully intercept vessels on the high seas without permission of the flag-state? In what circumstances, and under what conditions, can Israel undertake such an operation? Did Israel act lawfully when it intercepted the Gaza Freedom Flotilla vessels?

Keywords

Maritime warfare Blockades Interception Non-State actors Gaza Israeli-Hamas conflict Characterising conflicts Starvation as a method of warfare 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abi-Saab G (1979) Wars of national liberation in the Geneva Conventions and Protocols. Recueil des Cours 165:353–446Google Scholar
  2. Aldrich GH (1991) Prospects for united states ratification of additional protocol I to the 1949 Geneva conventions. AJIL 85:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aronson G (2005) Issues arising from the implementation of Israel’s disengagement from the Gaza Strip. J Palestine Stud 34:49–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartels R (2009) Timelines, borderlines and conflicts: the historical evolution of the legal divide between international and non-international armed conflicts. IRRC 873:35–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bashi S, Mann K (2007) Disengaged occupiers: the legal status of Gaza, Tel Aviv, Gisha: Legal Center for Freedom of Movement. Available at http://www.gisha.org/UserFiles/File/Report%20for%20the%20website.pdf
  6. Bell AC (1937) A history of the blockade of Germany and of the countries associated with her in the Great War, Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria, and Turkey, 1914–1918. H.M. Stationery Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Bell A, Shefi D (2010) The mythical post-2005 Israeli occupation of the Gaza Strip. Israel Affairs 16:268–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benvenisti E (2009) The law on the unilateral termination of occupation. In: Giegerich T, Heinz U (eds) A wiser century? Judicial dispute settlement, disarmament and the laws of war 100 years after the second Hague peace conference. Walther Schücking Institute, Berlin, Duncker & HumblotGoogle Scholar
  9. Black I (2010) Flotilla interception looks like a disastrous own goal for Israel, The Guardian. Available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/may/31/flotilla-interception-arab-turkish-analysis/ (Accessed 1 June 2010)
  10. Bothe (1988) Commentary on the 1977 Geneva protocol I. In: Ronzitti N (ed), The law of naval warfare: a collection of agreements and documents with commentaries. Nijhoff, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  11. Bruderlein C (2004) Legal aspects of Israel’s disengagement plan under international humanitarian law. Available at http://www.ihlresearch.org/opt/pdfs/briefing3466.pdf
  12. Buckingham DE (1994) A recipe for change: towards an integrated approach to food under international law. Pace Int Law Rev 6:285–321Google Scholar
  13. Cassese A (1984) The Geneva protocols of 1977 on the humanitarian law of armed conflict and customary international law. UCLA Pacific Basin Law J 3:55–118Google Scholar
  14. Commission on the responsibilities of the authors of the war on the enforcement of penalties (1920) AJIL 14:95–154Google Scholar
  15. Crawford JR (2007) The creation of states in international law, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cullen A (2010) The Concept of non-international armed conflict in international humanitarian law. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Darcy S, Reynolds J (2010) ‘Otherwise occupied’: the status of the Gaza Strip from the perspective of international humanitarian law. JCSL 15:211–243Google Scholar
  18. Dinstein Y (2009) The international law of belligerent occupation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dörmann K (2003) Elements of war crimes under the Rome statute of the international criminal court: sources and commentary. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Doswald-Beck L (ed) (1995) San Remo manual on international law applicable to armed conflicts at sea. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Draft Convention on Rights and Duties of Neutral States in Naval and Aerial War (1939) AJIL Supplement 33:167–817Google Scholar
  22. Draper GIAD (1979) Wars of national liberation and war criminality. In: Howard M (ed) Restraints in war. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  23. Falk FA (1964) International law of internal law. In: Rosenau JN (ed) International aspects of civil strife. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJGoogle Scholar
  24. Final Protocol of the London Naval Conference (1909) 3 AJIL Supplement 3Google Scholar
  25. Fraunces MG (1992) The international law of blockade: new guiding principles in contemporary state practice. Yale LJ 101:893–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Frenkel S (2010) Israeli document: Gaza blockade isn’t about security’. McClatchy Newspapers. Available athttp://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/06/09/95621/israeli-document-gaza-blockade.html#ixzz0qSOTiCqD Accessed 9 June 2010
  27. Greenberg (2008a) Gaza closure defined: collective punishment. Available at http://gisha.org/UserFiles/File/publications/GazaClosureDefinedEng.pdf Accessed 23 Sept 2008
  28. Greenberg H (2008b) Israel considering reducing the passage of goods to the Strip, Ynet. Available in Hebrew at http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-3600973,00.html Accessed 23 Sept 2008
  29. Guardian the, Gaza on brink of implosion as aid cut-off starts to bite (2006). Available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/apr/16/israel Accessed 16 April 2006
  30. Haaretz (2010) Lieberman: Israel shouldn’t lift Gaza siege until Hamas lets Red Cross see Shalit. Available at http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/lieberman-israel-shouldn-t-lift-gaza-siege-until-hamas-lets-red-cross-see-shalit-1.295342 Accessed 10 June 2010
  31. Halifax EFLW Lord (1938) Leag Nations Off J p 330Google Scholar
  32. Hass A (2010) Israel releases papers detailing formula of Gaza blockade, Haaretz. Available at http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/israel-releases-papers-detailing-formula-of-gaza-blockade-1.321154 Accessed 26 Oct 2010
  33. Heintschel von Heinegg W (2006a) The current state of the law of naval warfare: a fresh look at the San Remo Manual. In: Helm AM (ed) International law studies—The law of war in the 21st century: weaponry and the use of force, Vol 82Google Scholar
  34. Heintschel von Heinegg W (2006b) Naval blockade and international law. In: Elleman BA, Paine SCM (eds) Naval blockades and seapower: strategies and counter-strategies, 1805–2005. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Heintschel von Heinegg W (2008) Blockade: the law of armed conflict at sea. In: Fleck D (ed) The handbook of international humanitarian law, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  36. Heller KJ (2010) The civil war and the blockade on Gaza (a response to Posner, Opinio Juris. Available at http://opiniojuris.org/2010/06/04/eric-posners-incomplete-editorial-on-the-blockade-of-gaza/ Accessed 4 June 2010
  37. Henckaerts J (2005) Study on customary international law: a contribution to the understanding and respect for the rule of law in armed conflict. IRRC 857:175–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Henckaerts J, Doswell-Beck L (eds) (2005) Customary international humanitarian law. vols. I, II. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  39. Jones TD (1983) The international law of maritime blockade—a measure of naval economic interdiction. Howard Law J 26:759Google Scholar
  40. Kaliser MS (2007) A modern day exodus: international human rights law and international humanitarian law implications of Israel’s withdrawal from the Gaza Strip. Indiana I Comp LR 17:187–229Google Scholar
  41. Lauterpacht H (1947) Recognition in international law. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  42. Lauterpacht H (ed) (1952) Oppenheim’s international law, vol II, 7th edn. Longmans, Green and Co, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. Lootsteen YM (2000) The concept of belligerency in international law. Mil LR 166:109–141Google Scholar
  44. Macalister-Smith P (1991) The protection of the civilian population and the prohibition of starvation as a method of conflict: draft texts relating to international humanitarian assistance. Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  45. Malanczuk P (2002) Akehurst’s modern introduction to international law, 7th rev edn. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Mallison SV, Mallison WT (1976) A survey of the international law of naval blockade. US Naval Institute Proceedings 102:45Google Scholar
  47. Manual of the Law of Armed Conflict (2004) UK Ministry of Defence. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  48. Mari M (2005) The Israeli disengagement from the Gaza Strip: an end of the occupation? YIHL 8:356–368Google Scholar
  49. Mastorodimos K (2010) The character of the conflict in Gaza: another argument towards abolishing the distinction between international and non-international armed conflicts. Int Commun Law Rev pp 437–469Google Scholar
  50. Milanovic M (2010) What exactly internationalizes an internal armed conflict? Eur J Int Law: Talk!. Available at http://www.ejiltalk.org/what-exactly-internationalizes-an-internal-armed-conflict/Accessed 7 May 2010
  51. Moir L (2008) The law of international armed conflict. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  52. Myers DP (1910) The legal basis of the rules of blockade in the declaration of London. AJIL 4:571–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Oglesby RR (1971) Internal war and the search for normative order. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp 100–114Google Scholar
  54. Owen D (1898) Maritime warfare and merchant-shopping: a summary of the rights of capture at sea. Stevens and Sons Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  55. Pictet J (ed) (1958) Commentary: fourth Geneva convention relative to the protection of civilian persons in time of war. International Committee of the Red Cross, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  56. Rauch E (1984) The protocol additional to the geneva conventions for the protection of victims of international armed conflicts and the United Nations convention on the law of the sea: repercussions on the law of naval warfare. Duncker & Humblot, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  57. Reuters (2011) WikiLeaks: Israel aimed to keep Gaza economy on brink of collapse, Haaretz. Available at http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/wikileaks-israel-aimed-to-keep-gaza-economy-on-brink-of-collapse-1.335354. Accessed 5 Jan 2011
  58. Rosenblad E (1973) Starvation as a method of warfare—conditions for regulation by convention. International Lawyer 7:252–270Google Scholar
  59. Sandoz C, Swinarski C, Zimmerman B (eds) (1987) Commentary on the additional protocols of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva conventions of 12 August 1949, Geneva, ICRC and Dordrecht, Martinus NijhoffGoogle Scholar
  60. Scobbie I (2004–2005) An intimate disengagement: Israel’s withdrawal from Gaza, the law of occupation and of self-determination. Yearbook of Islamic and Middle Eastern Law 11, pp 3–31, reprinted in Kattan V (ed) (2008) The Palestine question in international law, London, British Institute of International and Comparative Law, pp 637–665Google Scholar
  61. Shani Y (2005) Faraway, so close: the legal status of Gaza after Israel’s disengagement. YIHL 8:369–383Google Scholar
  62. Shany Y (2010) Know Your Rights! The Flotilla report and international law governing naval blockades. Eur J Int Law: Talk! Available at http://www.ejiltalk.org/know-your-rights-the-flotilla-report-and-international-law-governing-naval-blockades/ Accessed 12 October 2010
  63. Therry R (ed) (1830) The speeches of the Right Hon. George Canning, vol. V. J. Ridgway, LondonGoogle Scholar
  64. Triffterer O (2008) Commentary on the Rome statute of the international criminal court: observers’ Notes, Article by Article, 2nd edn. Beck, MunchenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Stichting T.M.C. Asser Instituut, The Hague, and the authors 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CambridgeLondonUK

Personalised recommendations